Steve Daines (R-MT)
America the Beautiful Act
A Republican bill with 34 Democratic cosponsors · See all 70 cosponsors
Last activity — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 439.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "America the Beautiful Act," aims to amend title 54 of the United States Code regarding the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund. It reauthorizes the fund and adjusts deposit amounts and timelines. The legislation modifies how funds are used, prioritizing specific deferred maintenance projects and defining what constitutes deferred maintenance. It also establishes new methods for soliciting public donations and handling the disposal of certain assets. Additionally, the bill introduces a surcharge for nonresident visitors to National Park System units and grants the Secretary of the Interior authority to license intellectual property.
Yes· 3 of 22
- Scored +8
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
Provides significant funding and tools to reduce the deferred maintenance backlog of federal lands.
- Scored +6
Does this repair or build roads and bridges?
Specifically funds deferred maintenance for transportation projects including roads, bridges, and tunnels.
- Scored +5
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
Allows Indian Tribes to enter into noncompetitive contracts for priority restoration projects.
The opposite
- Scored -4
Would immigrants be better off under this?
Imposes a new surcharge on nonresident visitors who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Project Prioritization: The bill directs the Secretary and the Secretary of Agriculture to prioritize projects that receive donations of at least 15 percent of total costs, which could encourage more funding for specific needs (Section 2, subsection (b)).
-
Expanded Use of Funds: Funds can now be used on land administered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, expanding the scope of eligible lands (Section 2, subsection (b)).
-
Streamlined Project Completion: The bill includes provisions to expedite environmental reviews through categorical exclusions, which may help complete deferred maintenance projects more quickly (Section 2, subsection (j)).
-
Increased Maintenance Efficiency: The bill requires agencies to submit a plan to increase preventative annual and cyclic maintenance to prevent the addition of new assets to deferred maintenance lists (Section 2, subsection (f)).
-
Targeted Maintenance Focus: Funds are prioritized for projects addressing imminent threats to public health or safety, as well as those preventing further deterioration of assets (Section 2, subsection (g)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
New Fees for Visitors: Nonresident visitors (those who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents) will be subject to a new entrance fee surcharge at National Park System units (Section 3).
-
Restrictions on Fund Use: The bill explicitly prohibits using fund amounts for the acquisition of land, for employee bonuses, or to decommission roads on National Forest System or Bureau of Land Management land (Section 2, subsection (f)).
-
Specific Asset Disposal: The Secretary and the Secretary of Agriculture are authorized to provide for the disposal of constructed assets that no longer serve the public interest or advance the mission of their unit (Section 2, subsection (f) and subsection (p)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Allows Indian Tribes to enter into noncompetitive contracts for priority restoration projects. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Brings infrastructure investment and jobs to rural areas surrounding federal lands. Would business owners be better off under this? — Creates opportunities for contractors and concessioners in the restoration sector. Would union members be better off under this? — Increases demand for construction and maintenance labor. Would children be better off under this? — Improved public lands provide better recreational and educational opportunities for children. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Maintains public access to recreational federal lands. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Maintains public access to low-cost recreational federal lands. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Improved public lands provide better recreational opportunities. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Maintains public access to recreational federal lands. Would retired people be better off under this? — Improves assets and accessibility of national parks. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Improved public lands provide better recreational opportunities. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Improves the quality of national parks often visited by urban populations. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Improved public lands provide better recreational opportunities. Would immigrants be better off under this? — Imposes a new surcharge on nonresident visitors who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — Provides significant funding and tools to reduce the deferred maintenance backlog of federal lands. Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — Specifically funds deferred maintenance for transportation projects including roads, bridges, and tunnels. Does this invest in rural communities? — Investments in public lands often benefit rural gateway communities through job creation and tourism. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Focuses on restoring and preserving federal lands and natural resources.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — Funding for deferred maintenance projects typically leads to increased construction and service jobs. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Investment in public infrastructure and land assets can stimulate local economies in gateway communities. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — Prioritizes preventive maintenance to avoid higher future replacement costs. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Increased contracting opportunities for restoration projects can benefit small businesses.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Requires annual reports to Congress and establishes standardized metrics for tracking maintenance.
- 8/7/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/15/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/18/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/17/2026
- Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Lee with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 439.
- 6/4/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/12/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 4/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/5/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/12/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/22/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/21/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/16/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/8/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/31/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/29/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/14/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 7/9/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/26/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/23/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 5/1/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
- Alan Armstrong
Republican · Oklahoma
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Joni ErnstRepublican · Iowa
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
John HoevenRepublican · North Dakota
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
Josh HawleyRepublican · Missouri
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Mitch McConnellRepublican · Kentucky
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Lisa MurkowskiRepublican · Alaska
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Markwayne MullinRepublican · Oklahoma
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Tim ScottRepublican · South Carolina
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Eric SchmittRepublican · Missouri
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana