Kevin Cramer

Became law (5)

• 

  John Thune (R-SD)· May 4

  Cosponsored

  Tribal Trust Land Homeownership Act of 2025

  S. 723 Native Americans

  A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The House voted 384–40 on Mar 4.

  This bill sets strict deadlines for the Bureau of Indian Affairs to review and process mortgages and related documents on Indian land.

  Yes· 2 of 13

  • Scored +7

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    The bill directly addresses barriers to homeownership and economic growth for Indian Tribes and their members.

  • Scored +5

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill mandates public notice of delays and annual reporting to Congress to ensure transparency.

  The opposite

  • Scored -2

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The bill imposes new, strict administrative and reporting requirements on the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

• 

  Jerry Moran (R-KS)· Nov 25

  Cosponsored

  Veterans’ Compensation Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 2025

  S. 2392 Armed Forces and National Security

  A Republican bill with 14 Democratic cosponsors.

  Became law

  This Act aims to increase compensation rates for various groups.

  Yes· 2 of 6

  • Scored +7

    Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?

    The bill directly increases rates for wartime disability compensation and clothing allowances for veterans.

  • Scored +7

    Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?

    The bill mandates an increase in disability compensation, clothing allowances, and dependency compensation for veterans and their families.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  John Curtis (R-UT)· Jun 20

  Cosponsored

  A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Review of Final Rule Reclassification of Major Sources as Area Sources Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act".

  S.J.Res. 31 Environmental Protection

  A Republican resolution with 5 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The House voted 216–212 on May 22.

  This joint resolution seeks to provide congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +1

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Business owners benefit from the prevention of the EPA rule's enforcement and its associated compliance costs.

  • Scored +1

    Does this make it easier to run a small business?

    The resolution reduces the regulatory burden on businesses by ensuring the EPA's reclassification rule has no force or effect.

  The opposite· 2 of 3

  • Scored -3

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The resolution undermines environmental protections by nullifying an EPA rule regarding the classification of major pollution sources under the Clean Air Act.

  • Scored -2

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The resolution uses congressional authority to strip the EPA of the power to implement the specific rule in question.

And 2 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (8)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  John Hoeven (R-ND)· Oct 29

  Cosponsored

  Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library Act

  S. 675 Arts, Culture, Religion

  A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor.

  Passed the Senate

  Since then: a House committee approved it and sent it to the floor

  Now: in the queue for a floor vote, with no date set · Oct 29

  This bill allows the Secretary of the Interior to provide up to $50,000,000 in grants to the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library Foundation.

  Yes

  • Scored +3

    Would students be better off under this?

    The bill funds educational services and historical preservation which can benefit students.

  • Scored +2

    Would people in rural areas be better off under this?

    The establishment of a library in Medora, North Dakota, provides economic and cultural development for rural areas.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  David McCormick (R-PA)· Sep 28

  Cosponsored

  Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2026

  S. 4395 Finance and Financial Sector

  A Republican bill with 20 Democratic cosponsors.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Oct 5

  This bill extends the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 by seven years. The new termination date for the program is changed from 2027 to 2034.

  Yes· 2 of 5

  • Scored +3

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Business owners benefit from the extended availability and affordability of terrorism risk insurance coverage.

  • Scored +3

    Is this likely to grow the economy?

    Extending the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program provides stability and confidence for commercial real estate and business investments.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Maggie Hassan (D-NH)· Aug 5

  Cosponsored

  Northern Border Security Enhancement and Review Act

  S. 850 Immigration

  A Democratic bill with 3 Republican cosponsors.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Aug 10

  This Act amends the Northern Border Security Review Act. It requires updates to the northern border threat analysis every three years.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +3

    Does this tighten control of the border?

    The bill enhances border security through more frequent threat analysis and strategic updates.

  • Scored +2

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill increases transparency through required classified briefings to congressional committees.

  No question was scored the opposite.

And 5 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 38 no, 109 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber (2 yes, 1 no)
• Would business owners be better off under this? 20 no, 111 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber
• Would people in rural areas be better off under this? 0 no, 94 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber
• Would children be better off under this? 9 no, 73 yes.

What else they would change

• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 7 no, 92 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber
• Does this give the federal government more power? 28 no, 70 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 3 no)
• Does this make it easier to run a small business? 8 no, 77 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber
• Is this likely to grow the economy? 2 no, 77 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber