CONGRESS FOR VOTERS

Alan Armstrong

Republican · U.S. Senator for Oklahoma

2 sponsored · 39 cosponsored

Age 64 · In office since 2026

Contact their office: (202) 224-4721 · 330 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 · Official website

Overview Votes (121) Sponsored (2) Cosponsored (39)

In the 119th Congress (2025–2026)

What they got done

Most bills never get a vote. These are the ones they wrote or backed that got somewhere.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (3)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

  • Alan Armstrong (R-OK)

    Their bill

    Dennis John Benigno Traumatic Brain Injury Program Reauthorization Act of 2026

    S. 5600 Health

    A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors.

    Passed the Senate

    By voice vote, no names recorded

    Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Oct 5

    This bill reauthorizes and updates federal programs related to traumatic brain injury surveillance, registries, and state grant programs through the year 2031.

    Yes· 2 of 17

    • Scored +5

      Would people with disabilities be better off under this?

      The bill reauthorizes and expands protection, advocacy services, and grant programs dedicated to individuals with traumatic brain injuries.

    • Scored +5

      Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

      The legislation requires public reports to Congress and online access to aggregated data regarding traumatic brain injury high-risk populations.

    No question was scored the opposite.

  • Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV)

    Cosponsored

    Tribal Access to Electronic Evidence Act

    S. 1574 Native Americans

    A Democratic bill with 3 Republican cosponsors.

    Passed the Senate

    With no one objecting, no names recorded

    Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Oct 5

    This bill amends the Stored Communications Act to include Tribal courts as courts of competent jurisdiction.

    Yes· 2 of 5

    • Scored +8

      Would Native Americans be better off under this?

      Significantly empowers Tribal courts and governments by granting them the authority to access electronic evidence.

    • Scored +3

      Would people in rural areas be better off under this?

      Positive impact for those living in Tribal jurisdictions who benefit from enhanced local law enforcement capabilities.

    The opposite

    • Scored -3

      Does this give people more control over their personal data?

      Allows for the disclosure of stored electronic communications and records by Tribal authorities, potentially reducing privacy.

    • Scored -3

      Does this protect people from being watched or searched?

      Enables Tribal authorities to access electronic records and potentially delay notification to the individual.

  • Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV)

    Cosponsored

    Tribal Warrant Fairness Act

    S. 3041 Native Americans

    A Democratic bill with 6 Republican cosponsors.

    Passed the Senate

    By voice vote, no names recorded

    Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Jun 15

    This bill allows the U.S. Marshals Service to help with certain Tribal criminal matters. Specifically, the U.S. Marshals Service can assist with Tribal fugitive matters when an Indian Tribe asks them to.

    Yes· 2 of 4

    • Scored +7

      Would Native Americans be better off under this?

      The bill directly benefits Native Americans and indigenous communities by providing federal U.S. Marshals Service support for tribal criminal and fugitive matters upon request.

    • Scored +6

      Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?

      The bill enhances tribal sovereignty and law enforcement cooperation by authorizing the U.S. Marshals Service to assist with tribal criminal and fugitive matters.

    No question was scored the opposite.

Still waiting, of the 2 bills they wrote: 1 is in committee. Committee is where most bills end, whoever writes them — silence there, not a vote, is the usual way a bill dies.

What their bills would do

Every bill is scored against plain yes-or-no questions. These count their bills — the ones they wrote and the ones they cosponsored — by how each question was answered: yes, or the opposite. Open one to see those bills, where each stands, and why it was scored that way. Scores are made by AI ().

Who their bills would affect

What else they would change

How they voted lately

Their latest votes that decided something, and what each measure would do.

  • U.S. Senate · Sep 29, 2026

    Protect College Sports Act of 2026

    S. 4668

    The vote on whether to pass the bill This is the real decision in this chamber. Passing here sends the bill to the other chamber, which must pass it too before it can go to the President.

    Their vote Yea

    Passed

    7722

    This bill sets national rules for student athlete name, image, and likeness rights. It creates protections for academic progress, medical coverage, and health and safety standards.

    • Scored +9

      Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?

      Significantly expands earning potential through NIL rights and provides medical and academic protections for college athletes.

    • Scored -5

      Does this leave more decisions to the states?

      Prevents states from enforcing their own NIL compensation and transfer laws that conflict with the federal framework.

  • U.S. Senate · Sep 29, 2026

    To increase the limitation on funding for post-eligibility insurance and catastrophic injury for student athletes.

    S.Amdt. 6805

    A vote on a proposed change to the bill A vote on one change, not on the bill. A bill can collect dozens of these, and losing one does not stop it.

    Their vote Nay

    Failed

    4950

    What the Amendment Does Mr. Booker, along with Mr. Blumenthal, submitted this amendment to change how a specific fund or program is paid for in the bill.

Every vote they cast, and how often they missed one →

On the President’s nominees

The President chooses federal judges, cabinet secretaries, ambassadors and military officers, and the Senate decides whether each one gets the job. Most are confirmed by voice vote, which records no one’s position. In the 119th Congress (2025–2026) the Senate put 224 confirmations to a recorded vote, and confirmed every one.

Their votes to confirm, of the 37 recorded votes held while they served

  • Yes: 37
  • No: None
  • Missed: None

Those votes covered 158 nominees, because the Senate sometimes confirms many in a single vote.

How busy they have been

How many bills they have put their name to over time — volume, not results: most bills never get a vote.

Legislative activity over time