Bernie Moreno

Became law (5)

• 

  John Cornyn (R-TX)· Apr 13

  Cosponsored

  Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025

  S. 1884 Law

  A Republican bill with 11 Democratic cosponsors.

  Became law

  This Act seeks to clarify and improve the existing 2016 Act. It aims to ensure that claims to recover Nazi-looted art are resolved on their actual merits rather than being dismissed due to various legal technicalities.

  Yes

  • Scored +7

    Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?

    The bill enhances legal recourse for victims by precluding time-based and discretionary defenses.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Bill Hagerty (R-TN)· Jul 18

  Cosponsored

  GENIUS Act

  S. 1582 Finance and Financial Sector

  A Republican bill with 5 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The House voted 308–122 on Jul 17.

  This bill establishes a regulatory framework for the issuance and operation of payment stablecoins in the United States.

  Yes· 2 of 4

  • Scored +7

    Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?

    The bill mandates transparent redemption policies and fees, increasing consumer protection in the stablecoin market.

  • Scored +7

    Does this give people more control over their personal data?

    The bill includes consumer data protection measures, limiting the use of nonpublic personal information for targeted advertising, sales to third parties, or sharing with non-affiliates without consent, enhancing data privacy.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  John Kennedy (R-LA)· Jun 20

  Cosponsored

  A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency of the Department of the Treasury relating to the review of applications under the Bank Merger Act.

  S.J.Res. 13 Finance and Financial Sector

  A Republican resolution with 5 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The House voted 220–207 on May 20.

  This joint resolution expresses congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

  Yes

  • Scored +1

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Disapproving merger rules may reduce regulatory hurdles for banking institutions and their business clients.

  The opposite

  • Scored -1

    Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?

    Disapproving bank merger rules may reduce oversight intended to protect consumers during bank consolidations.

  • Scored -1

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The resolution limits the regulatory authority of a federal agency, potentially reducing federal oversight of financial institutions.

And 2 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (11)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  Jon Husted (R-OH)· Nov 10

  Cosponsored

  A bill to amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, and for other purposes.

  S. 2434 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Nov 12

  This bill amends the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992. Its purpose is to adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +3

    Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?

    The bill expands the land area of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park.

  • Scored +1

    Would people in cities be better off under this?

    The land addition occurs within the city of Dayton, Ohio.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Gary Peters (D-MI)· Sep 29

  Cosponsored

  GLRI Act of 2026

  S. 528 Environmental Protection

  A Democratic bill with 3 Republican cosponsors.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Oct 5

  Its main purpose is to reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. Specifically, the legislation updates the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.

  Yes· 2 of 5

  • Scored +8

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The bill provides $500,000,000 annually for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative to protect water quality and ecosystems.

  • Scored +5

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    The Great Lakes are vital to the culture and resources of many Native American tribes.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  David McCormick (R-PA)· Sep 28

  Cosponsored

  Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2026

  S. 4395 Finance and Financial Sector

  A Republican bill with 20 Democratic cosponsors.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Oct 5

  This bill extends the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 by seven years. The new termination date for the program is changed from 2027 to 2034.

  Yes· 2 of 5

  • Scored +3

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Business owners benefit from the extended availability and affordability of terrorism risk insurance coverage.

  • Scored +3

    Is this likely to grow the economy?

    Extending the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program provides stability and confidence for commercial real estate and business investments.

  No question was scored the opposite.

And 8 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 51 no, 50 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (3 yes, 1 no)
• Would business owners be better off under this? 25 no, 70 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber
• Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? 40 no, 11 yes. 1 of these passed a chamber
• Would middle-income households be better off under this? 7 no, 42 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (3 yes, 1 no)

What else they would change

• Does this give the federal government more power? 29 no, 82 yes. 6 of these passed a chamber (3 yes, 3 no)
• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 11 no, 66 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber (4 yes, 1 no)
• Does this make it easier to run a small business? 9 no, 47 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber
• Does this leave more decisions to the states? 25 no, 29 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber