John Fetterman

Became law (5)

• 

  Susan Collins (R-ME)· Sep 30

  Cosponsored

  Kay Hagan Tick Reauthorization Act

  S. 2398 Health

  A Republican bill with 15 Democratic cosponsors.

  Became law

  This bill is designed to reauthorize specific programs related to vector-borne diseases. The legislation amends the Public Health Service Act to update the timeline for several provisions.

  Yes· 2 of 11

  • Scored +3

    Does this make the country readier for the next outbreak?

    The bill enhances support for health departments and regional centers that address vector-borne diseases, improving pandemic preparedness related to those diseases.

  • Scored +2

    Would children be better off under this?

    Preventing and treating vector-borne diseases has a small positive impact on children's health.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Steve Daines (R-MT)· May 11

  Cosponsored

  A bill to require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the time period during which licensees are required to commence construction of certain hydropower projects.

  S. 1020 Energy

  A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The House voted 394–14 on Apr 21.

  This bill directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the timeframe for starting construction on certain hydropower projects.

  Yes· 2 of 6

  • Scored +5

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    The bill benefits energy company owners by providing more time to commence construction and a mechanism to reinstate expired licenses.

  • Scored +3

    Is this likely to create jobs?

    The extension of construction timelines provides more time for hydropower projects to proceed, which may eventually create construction and operational jobs.

  The opposite

  • Scored -2

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    By extending construction timelines for older hydropower projects, the bill may delay the transition to newer environmental standards or mitigate the impact of older infrastructure.

• 

  John Cornyn (R-TX)· Apr 13

  Cosponsored

  Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025

  S. 1884 Law

  A Republican bill with 11 Democratic cosponsors.

  Became law

  This Act seeks to clarify and improve the existing 2016 Act. It aims to ensure that claims to recover Nazi-looted art are resolved on their actual merits rather than being dismissed due to various legal technicalities.

  Yes

  • Scored +7

    Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?

    The bill enhances legal recourse for victims by precluding time-based and discretionary defenses.

  No question was scored the opposite.

And 2 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (6)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  Gary Peters (D-MI)· Sep 29

  Cosponsored

  GLRI Act of 2026

  S. 528 Environmental Protection

  A Democratic bill with 3 Republican cosponsors.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Oct 5

  Its main purpose is to reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. Specifically, the legislation updates the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.

  Yes· 2 of 5

  • Scored +8

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The bill provides $500,000,000 annually for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative to protect water quality and ecosystems.

  • Scored +5

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    The Great Lakes are vital to the culture and resources of many Native American tribes.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)· Jun 11

  Cosponsored

  First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act

  S. 567 Armed Forces and National Security

  A Democratic bill with 25 Republican cosponsors.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Jun 15

  This bill orders the creation and presentation of a single Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment to honor their service during the Revolutionary War.

  Yes· 2 of 4

  • Scored +3

    Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?

    The bill honors the historical military service and sacrifice of veterans from the Revolutionary War.

  • Scored +3

    Would Black Americans be better off under this?

    The legislation explicitly recognizes and honors the significant contributions of soldiers of African heritage who served in the First Rhode Island Regiment during the Revolutionary War.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Deb Fischer (R-NE)· Jun 8

  Cosponsored

  North Platte Canteen Congressional Gold Medal Act

  S. 645 Armed Forces and National Security

  A Republican bill with 27 Democratic cosponsors.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Jun 9

  This Act authorizes the awarding of a Congressional Gold Medal to the individuals and communities who volunteered or donated to the North Platte Canteen in Nebraska during World War II.

  Yes· 2 of 4

  • Scored +5

    Would people in rural areas be better off under this?

    The bill honors a significant community-driven volunteer effort located in North Platte, Nebraska.

  • Scored +5

    Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?

    The bill honors the historical context of serving and supporting United States troops during World War II.

  No question was scored the opposite.

And 3 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 3 no, 218 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber
• Would business owners be better off under this? 71 no, 69 yes. 1 of these passed a chamber
• Would middle-income households be better off under this? 2 no, 117 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber
• Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? 0 no, 108 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber

What else they would change

• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 0 no, 158 yes. 1 of these passed a chamber
• Does this give the federal government more power? 5 no, 120 yes. 1 of these passed a chamber
• Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? 0 no, 118 yes. 1 of these passed a chamber
• Does this make health care easier to get in general? 0 no, 95 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber