Dan Sullivan

Became law (10)

• 

  Dan Sullivan (R-AK)· Jun 12

  Their bill

  ARTIST Act

  S. 254 Native Americans

  A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The House voted 404–14 on Jun 3.

  This bill aims to amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972.

  Yes· 2 of 11

  • Scored +7

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    The bill specifically protects the cultural practices and economic livelihoods of Alaska Natives.

  • Scored +5

    Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?

    The bill protects the cultural traditions and economic livelihoods of Alaska Native populations.

  The opposite

  • Scored -3

    Does this leave more decisions to the states?

    The bill explicitly prohibits States from banning or restricting the trade of these specific items.

  • Scored -2

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The bill creates exemptions for taking marine mammals, which may impact species protection if not strictly regulated.

• 

  Dan Sullivan (R-AK)· Dec 26

  Their bill

  Save Our Seas 2.0 Amendments Act

  S. 216 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor.

  Became law

  This bill seeks to update the administration of the Marine Debris Foundation and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Marine Debris Program.

  Yes· 2 of 4

  • Scored +6

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    The bill expands the Foundation's purposes to include Indian Tribes and mandates outreach best practices.

  • Scored +5

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The bill enhances the administration of marine debris programs to protect ocean environments.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Dan Sullivan (R-AK)· Dec 5

  Their bill

  A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska Integrated Activity Plan Record of Decision".

  S.J.Res. 80 Energy

  A Republican resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The House voted 216–209 on Nov 19.

  This joint resolution provides for congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management.

  Yes

  • Scored +5

    Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?

    The resolution halts the activity plan for petroleum production in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska.

  The opposite· 2 of 4

  • Scored -3

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    The disapproval negatively impacts businesses relying on the petroleum activities outlined in the rule.

  • Scored -2

    Would people in rural areas be better off under this?

    The restriction on petroleum activity may reduce economic opportunities for rural Alaska communities.

And 7 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (19)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  Dan Sullivan (R-AK)· Mar 22

  Their bill

  Fighting Foreign Illegal Seafood Harvests Act of 2025

  S. 688 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with 4 Democratic cosponsors.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Mar 24

  This bill aims to combat illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing at its global sources.

  Yes· 2 of 9

  • Scored +6

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The bill promotes the sustainability of fish stocks and combats illegal harvesting.

  • Scored +4

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The act requires the creation and publication of an IUU vessel list.

  The opposite

  • Scored -5

    Would immigrants be better off under this?

    The bill imposes strict visa sanctions and ineligibility for certain foreign persons.

  • Scored -1

    Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?

    The bill includes processes for challenging vessel placement on the IUU list, but imposes strict visa sanctions.

• 

  Dan Sullivan (R-AK)· Dec 9

  Their bill

  ADS for Mental Health Services Act

  S. 414 Health

  A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Dec 10

  This Act requires covered digital advertising platforms to report on their public service advertisements.

  Yes· 2 of 8

  • Scored +3

    Does this make mental health care easier to get?

    The bill promotes transparency and awareness for local, regional, and free mental and behavioral health care resources.

  • Scored +2

    Does this put more rules on large technology companies?

    The bill imposes new reporting obligations on large digital advertising platforms.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Dan Sullivan (R-AK)· Nov 19

  Their bill

  Save Our Seas 2.0 Marine Debris Infrastructure Programs Reauthorization Act

  S. 3022 Environmental Protection

  A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Nov 20

  This Act amends the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act to reauthorize specific Environmental Protection Agency programs. The bill changes the expiration date for these programs from 2025 to 2030.

  Yes

  • Scored +5

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    Reauthorizes EPA programs to combat plastic waste in marine environments.

  No question was scored the opposite.

And 16 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would business owners be better off under this? 23 no, 98 yes. 9 of these passed a chamber (7 yes, 2 no)
• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 16 no, 97 yes. 9 of these passed a chamber (8 yes, 1 no)
• Would people in rural areas be better off under this? 2 no, 105 yes. 12 of these passed a chamber (11 yes, 1 no)
• Would Native Americans be better off under this? 6 no, 72 yes. 9 of these passed a chamber (8 yes, 1 no)

What else they would change

• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 4 no, 93 yes. 13 of these passed a chamber
• Does this give the federal government more power? 24 no, 65 yes. 11 of these passed a chamber (9 yes, 2 no)
• Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? 31 no, 48 yes. 13 of these passed a chamber (10 yes, 3 no)
• Does this make it easier to run a small business? 7 no, 68 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber