CONGRESS FOR VOTERS

Mike Lee (R-UT)

A resolution condemning the assassination of Charlie Kirk and honoring his life and legacy.

S.Res. 391 · Senate resolution Crime and Law Enforcement

A Republican resolution with 2 Democratic cosponsors · See all 54 cosponsors

Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6637; text: CR S6652)

Adopted

The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.

Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Officially Recorded
  3. Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.

What this bill would do

This resolution condemns the assassination of Charlie Kirk, which happened on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University. It honors his life, legacy, and his role as a devoted husband, father, and Christian. The text notes that he founded Turning Point USA in 2012, which grew into a fast-growing campus organization. It also mentions that he engaged college students in open debates to encourage civil discourse. Finally, the Senate formally extends its condolences to his family and honors his commitment to constitutional principles of discussion and debate.

Yes

  • Scored +2

    Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life?

    The resolution honors civil discourse and debate, indirectly supporting principles of free expression.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.