Cynthia M. Lummis

Became law (7)

• 

  Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)· Sep 25

  Their bill

  A bill to redesignate the National Historic Trails Interpretive Center in Casper, Wyoming, as the "Barbara L. Cubin National Historic Trails Interpretive Center".

  S. 790 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor.

  Became law

  This bill simply renames a specific building located in Casper, Wyoming. It changes the name of the National Historic Trails Interpretive Center to the Barbara L. Cubin National Historic Trails Interpretive Center.

• 

  Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)· Dec 26

  Their bill

  Congressional Award Program Reauthorization Act

  S. 284 Congress

  A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The House voted 370–22 on Dec 15.

  Its primary purpose is to reauthorize the Congressional Award Act. The bill extends the termination date of the program from October 1, 2023, to October 1, 2028.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +3

    Would children be better off under this?

    The extension of the Congressional Award Program ensures continued recognition and opportunities for young people.

  • Scored +3

    Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?

    Extending the program provides several more years of opportunity for young adults to earn prestigious recognition.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Bill Hagerty (R-TN)· Jul 18

  Cosponsored

  GENIUS Act

  S. 1582 Finance and Financial Sector

  A Republican bill with 5 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The House voted 308–122 on Jul 17.

  This bill establishes a regulatory framework for the issuance and operation of payment stablecoins in the United States.

  Yes· 2 of 4

  • Scored +7

    Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?

    The bill mandates transparent redemption policies and fees, increasing consumer protection in the stablecoin market.

  • Scored +7

    Does this give people more control over their personal data?

    The bill includes consumer data protection measures, limiting the use of nonpublic personal information for targeted advertising, sales to third parties, or sharing with non-affiliates without consent, enhancing data privacy.

  No question was scored the opposite.

And 4 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Passed one chamber (11)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President. One of these was stopped after it passed.

• 

  Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)· Sep 30

  Their bill

  Wyoming Education Trust Modernization Act

  S. 2273 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Oct 5

  This bill amends the Act of July 10, 1890. The legislation modifies certain provisions related to the disposal of public land in the State of Wyoming for educational purposes.

  Yes· 2 of 5

  • Scored +1

    Would children be better off under this?

    Updating the trust language supports long-term educational funding structures.

  • Scored +1

    Would students be better off under this?

    The bill helps maintain the long-term financial clarity of education-related land trusts.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)· Aug 7

  Their bill

  Common Cents Act

  S. 1525 Finance and Financial Sector

  A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Aug 10

  This bill directs the Secretary of the Treasury to cease the production of one-cent coins for general circulation.

  Yes· 2 of 6

  • Scored +5

    Would workers who earn tips be better off under this?

    The bill requires employers to round cash payments to employees up to the nearest five cents.

  • Scored +1

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    The bill reduces production and handling costs for small denominations.

  The opposite· 2 of 4

  • Scored -1

    Would people over 65 be better off under this?

    The bill notes that older consumers may be negatively impacted by changes to the penny and new rounding practices.

  • Scored -1

    Would households on low incomes be better off under this?

    The bill identifies potential adverse impacts of rounding and penny supply disruptions on low-income communities.

• 

  Mark Kelly (D-AZ)· Sep 30

  Cosponsored

  MORE American Fuel Act of 2026

  S. 5249 Energy

  A Democratic bill with 2 Republican cosponsors.

  Passed the Senate

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  Now: kept ready for the floor instead of being sent to a committee · Oct 5

  This bill amends the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to align the licensing of uranium enrichment facilities with other fuel cycle facilities.

  Yes· 2 of 6

  • Scored +3

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    The bill provides significant regulatory relief and speed to energy industry applicants via pre-license construction.

  • Scored +2

    Is this likely to grow the economy?

    The bill aims to expand American fuel capacity, which can contribute to long-term economic and energy security growth.

  The opposite· 2 of 3

  • Scored -2

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The bill's emphasis on pre-license construction and streamlined hearings may reduce the rigor of environmental oversight during the initial stages.

  • Scored -1

    Does this leave more decisions to the states?

    By streamlining the federal licensing process, the bill reduces some of the local/state-level control over the construction phase.

And 8 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would business owners be better off under this? 23 no, 135 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber (4 yes, 1 no)
• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 55 no, 82 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber (2 yes, 3 no)
• Would people in rural areas be better off under this? 2 no, 112 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber
• Would middle-income households be better off under this? 12 no, 48 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber (2 yes, 1 no)

What else they would change

• Does this give the federal government more power? 53 no, 87 yes. 8 of these passed a chamber (4 yes, 4 no)
• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 11 no, 124 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (3 yes, 1 no)
• Does this make it easier to run a small business? 9 no, 92 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber (4 yes, 1 no)
• Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? 49 no, 34 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (2 yes, 2 no)