A Republican bill with 33 Democratic cosponsors · See all 59 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Alzheimer's Screening and Prevention Act or the ASAP Act. It amends title XVIII of the Social Security Act. The main goal is to provide Medicare coverage for blood-based dementia screening tests. These tests are meant for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. The coverage is set to begin on or after January 1, 2028.
Yes· 3 of 23
- Scored +9
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Directly benefits seniors by providing Medicare coverage for critical dementia screening.
- Scored +9
Would retired people be better off under this?
Directly improves healthcare coverage for the primary population of retirees via Medicare.
- Scored +7
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
Provides Medicare beneficiaries access to advanced blood-based dementia screening tests.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
Expanding Medicare coverage for new screening tests likely increases federal spending.
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill increases government expenditures by adding a new covered benefit to Medicare.
- Scored -1
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?
Adding new mandates to Medicare spending without funding offsets slightly reduces fiscal restraint.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Medicare coverage for early detection: Section 2(a) adds coverage under Medicare for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias early detection screening tests. This is a positive step because it helps individuals get screened for pre-symptomatic and early stages of dementia using blood tests and other specified methods starting January 1, 2028.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts found: The provided text does not contain any sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would retired people be better off under this? — Directly improves healthcare coverage for the primary population of retirees via Medicare. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Directly benefits seniors by providing Medicare coverage for critical dementia screening. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Reduces the financial barrier to expensive diagnostic tests for low-income Medicare recipients. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Reduces out-of-pocket costs for dementia screening for middle-class Medicare recipients. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Increases access to diagnostics for a population that often faces healthcare disparities. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Increases access to diagnostics for a population that often faces healthcare disparities. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Increases access to diagnostics for a population that often faces healthcare disparities. Would men be better off under this? — Provides critical early detection screening for dementia. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Increases access to diagnostics for a population that often faces healthcare disparities. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Benefits those with cognitive disabilities through earlier diagnosis and intervention. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Many veterans are Medicare eligible and would benefit from this screening. Would white Americans be better off under this? — Increases access to diagnostics for the general senior population. Would women be better off under this? — Women are disproportionately affected by Alzheimer's and benefit from improved screening. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Increases available health diagnostic options via Medicare. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Provides health benefit improvements, though they may already afford such tests. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Increases available health diagnostic options via Medicare. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Allows for pre-symptomatic screening in middle age to plan for future health. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Increases available health diagnostic options via Medicare.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Provides Medicare beneficiaries access to advanced blood-based dementia screening tests. Does this put more money into Medicare, the health coverage for people over 65? — The bill expands the scope of Medicare coverage to include dementia screening tests. Does this make mental health care easier to get? — Early detection of dementia is a critical component of cognitive and mental health care. Does this put more money into medical research? — Increased clinical adoption of these tests likely drives further research and development in diagnostics.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill increases government expenditures by adding a new covered benefit to Medicare. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Expanding Medicare coverage for new screening tests likely increases federal spending. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — Adding new mandates to Medicare spending without funding offsets slightly reduces fiscal restraint.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Expands federal Medicare mandates and Secretary of HHS authority over approved tests.
- 11/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/24/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/7/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/3/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/2/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 6/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/4/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/12/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- Alan Armstrong
Republican · Oklahoma
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
John HoevenRepublican · North Dakota
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Jerry MoranRepublican · Kansas
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Lisa MurkowskiRepublican · Alaska
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana