John Kennedy (R-LA)
Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act of 2025
A Republican bill with 40 Republican cosponsors · See all 40 cosponsors
Last activity — Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-35.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the ``Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act of 2025'', seeks to amend title 38 of the United States Code. It aims to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from sharing certain information with the Department of Justice. Specifically, it targets the transmission of personally identifiable information for use by the national instant criminal background check system. This prohibition applies when the information is shared solely because the Secretary determined to pay benefits to a fiduciary for a beneficiary. Under this act, such information could not be shared without a judicial order or finding.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +9
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
Directly protects the firearm rights and privacy of veterans receiving fiduciary benefits.
- Scored +8
Does this protect the right to own guns?
The bill prevents the loss of firearm access for veterans solely due to the appointment of a fiduciary without judicial oversight.
- Scored +7
Would gun owners be better off under this?
Prevents automatic disqualification from firearm ownership for certain veterans.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this put more limits on buying or owning guns?
The bill restricts the flow of information used by the NICS background check system.
- Scored -2
Does this give the federal government more power?
Limits the administrative power of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
- Scored -2
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?
Reduces the amount of data transmitted by the VA to the DOJ.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Personally Identifiable Information: The bill prevents the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from transmitting a beneficiary's personally identifiable information to the Department of Justice for use in the national instant criminal background check system based solely on a fiduciary benefit determination (Section 2(a)).
-
Requirement of Judicial Oversight: This provision ensures that information cannot be shared for these specific purposes without a finding or order from a judge, magistrate, or other judicial authority of competent jurisdiction that the beneficiary is a danger to themselves or others (Section 2(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Directly protects the firearm rights and privacy of veterans receiving fiduciary benefits. Would gun owners be better off under this? — Prevents automatic disqualification from firearm ownership for certain veterans. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Protects those who need fiduciaries for benefit management from automatic loss of gun rights. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Protects senior veterans who may require fiduciaries for benefit management.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Requires a judge or magistrate to determine if a beneficiary is a danger before their info is sent to NICS. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — Ensures a judicial finding is required before sharing sensitive beneficiary data for firearm background checks. Does this give the federal government more power? — Limits the administrative power of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — Restricts the transfer of personally identifiable information between government agencies.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this protect the right to own guns? — The bill prevents the loss of firearm access for veterans solely due to the appointment of a fiduciary without judicial oversight. Does this put more limits on buying or owning guns? — The bill restricts the flow of information used by the NICS background check system.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — Protects the legal rights and privacy of veterans receiving fiduciary benefits. Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country? — Reduces the amount of data transmitted by the VA to the DOJ.
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/6/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/5/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/28/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/11/2025
- Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-35.
- 2/6/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
- 15 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
- Darline Graham
Republican · South Carolina
John HoevenRepublican · North Dakota
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Jerry MoranRepublican · Kansas
Lisa MurkowskiRepublican · Alaska
Markwayne MullinRepublican · Oklahoma
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Rand PaulRepublican · Kentucky
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana