Roger Wicker (R-MS)
No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025
A Republican bill with 50 Republican cosponsors · See all 50 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025" seeks to prohibit the use of federal funds for abortions. It prohibits federal funds from being used for abortions or for health benefits plans that include abortion coverage. The bill also limits health care services provided by federal facilities or employees. It establishes exceptions for abortions resulting from rape or incest, and those needed to preserve the life of the mother. Additionally, the act modifies the Affordable Care Act regarding premium credits and cost-sharing reductions. Finally, it revises notice requirements for disclosing abortion coverage and related surcharges.
Yes
- Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill increases transparency by requiring health plans to disclose abortion coverage and specific surcharges.
- Scored +2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill reduces federal spending by prohibiting the use of federal funds for abortions and certain health plans.
- Scored +2
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill expands federal authority by prohibiting the use of federal funds for abortion-related healthcare across various programs.
The opposite· 3 of 19
- Scored -7
Would women be better off under this?
The bill limits access to abortion services and reduces federal subsidies for health plans that include abortion coverage.
- Scored -7
Does this make abortion easier to get?
The bill restricts access to abortion services through federal facilities, employees, and the loss of federal subsidies for related health plans.
- Scored -5
Does this strengthen the Affordable Care Act?
The bill reduces support for the ACA by eliminating premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions for plans that include abortion coverage.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Exceptions for Medical Emergencies and Crime: The bill ensures that funding limitations do not apply to abortions performed to prevent a physical disorder, injury, or illness that places a woman in danger of death, nor to abortions resulting from rape or incest (Section 308).
-
Coverage for Medical Complications: The act allows for the treatment of infections, injuries, diseases, or disorders that result from or are exacerbated by an abortion (Section 307).
-
Transparency in Health Plan Coverage: The bill requires that the extent of abortion coverage in a qualified health plan be disclosed during enrollment and prominently displayed in marketing, advertising, or summary documents (Section 202(a)).
-
Clarity on Premium Costs: For qualified health plans that include abortion services, the bill requires the specific surcharge attributable to those services to be identified and disclosed separately (Section 202(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Federal Subsidies for Specific Health Plans: The bill prohibits the use of federal funds for health benefits coverage that includes abortion, which means individuals with such plans would not be eligible for refundable premium tax credits or cost-sharing reductions under the Affordable Care Act (Section 201(a)(1) and Section 302).
-
Restriction of Benefits for Small Employers: Under the new rules, the small employer health insurance expense credit would not apply to qualified health plans that include coverage for abortions (Section 201(a)(2)).
-
Limitations on Federal Health Services: Individuals receiving health care from facilities owned or operated by the Federal Government, or from individuals employed by the Federal Government, would be prohibited from receiving abortion services (Section 303).
-
Restrictions on Multi-State Plans: The bill mandates that multi-state qualified health plans offered on an Exchange cannot provide coverage for which the expenditure of federal funds is prohibited by this act (Section 201(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The bill limits access to abortion services and reduces federal subsidies for health plans that include abortion coverage. Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill removes the small employer health insurance expense credit for businesses providing plans with abortion coverage. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill reduces the availability of federal subsidies for health insurance plans that include abortion coverage, impacting low-income access. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — The bill reduces premium tax credits for middle-aged individuals opting for health plans that include abortion coverage. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill reduces premium tax credits for middle-income households whose health plans include abortion coverage. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill may increase costs for young adults who rely on ACA subsidies and wish to have abortion coverage in their health plans. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill may disproportionately impact low-income minority groups by reducing health insurance subsidies. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The bill may disproportionately impact low-income minority groups by reducing health insurance subsidies. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill may disproportionately impact low-income minority groups by reducing health insurance subsidies. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The bill may reduce access to comprehensive health coverage that often includes diverse reproductive needs. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill may disproportionately impact low-income minority groups by reducing health insurance subsidies.
- Healthcare
- Does this make abortion easier to get? — The bill restricts access to abortion services through federal facilities, employees, and the loss of federal subsidies for related health plans. Does this strengthen the Affordable Care Act? — The bill reduces support for the ACA by eliminating premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions for plans that include abortion coverage. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill restricts access to specific healthcare services and subsidies provided under the Affordable Care Act. Does this put more money into Medicaid, the health coverage for people on low incomes? — The bill restricts the use of federal funds and matching funds for certain health plans, impacting Medicaid administration. Does this lower what people pay for private health insurance? — The bill may increase costs for individuals seeking coverage that includes abortion due to the loss of federal subsidies.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill reduces federal spending by prohibiting the use of federal funds for abortions and certain health plans. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill disqualifies small employers from the health insurance expense credit if their plans include abortion coverage. Does this cut taxes for middle-income families? — The bill reduces premium tax credits for middle-income families who select health plans containing abortion coverage.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill increases transparency by requiring health plans to disclose abortion coverage and specific surcharges. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands federal authority by prohibiting the use of federal funds for abortion-related healthcare across various programs.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill may negatively impact poverty reduction by reducing federal subsidies available for certain health insurance plans.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/22/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 45 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas
John CurtisRepublican · Utah
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Joni ErnstRepublican · Iowa
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
Chuck GrassleyRepublican · Iowa
- Darline Graham
Republican · South Carolina
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
John HoevenRepublican · North Dakota
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
Josh HawleyRepublican · Missouri
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
Ron JohnsonRepublican · Wisconsin
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Mitch McConnellRepublican · Kentucky
Jerry MoranRepublican · Kansas
Markwayne MullinRepublican · Oklahoma
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Ashley MoodyRepublican · Florida
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Tim ScottRepublican · South Carolina
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Eric SchmittRepublican · Missouri
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
John ThuneRepublican · South Dakota
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana