Thomas Tillis (R-NC)

DETERRENT Act

S. 1296 · Senate bill Education

A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 24 cosponsors

Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The DETERRENT Act seeks to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase transparency regarding foreign financial ties to colleges and universities. It strengthens disclosure requirements for gifts and contracts received from foreign sources. The bill prohibits institutions of higher education from entering into contracts with specific foreign countries or entities of concern, subject to a strict waiver process. Additionally, it requires institutions to implement policies and databases to track financial disclosures from faculty and staff. The Act also establishes strict enforcement mechanisms, including significant fines and civil actions for non-compliance.

Yes

  • Scored +7

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill mandates a public, searchable database for foreign gifts and contracts, greatly increasing institutional transparency.

  • Scored +5

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The bill significantly increases federal oversight and enforcement authority over higher education institutions regarding foreign ties.

The opposite

  • Scored -2

    Does this make college cost less?

    The administrative burdens and potential loss of federal funding may negatively impact college affordability and institutional stability.

  • Scored -1

    Does this put more money into scientific research?

    Strict disclosure and contract prohibitions could restrict the flow of foreign funds vital for research.

  • Scored -1

    Would students be better off under this?

    The restrictions on foreign funding and increased compliance costs could indirectly impact student opportunities and institutional resources.