Todd Young (R-IN)
A resolution recognizing the 80th anniversary of the amphibious landing on the Japanese island of Iwo Jima during World War II and the raisings of the flag of the United States on Mount Suribachi.
A Republican resolution with 15 Democratic cosponsors · See all 38 cosponsors
Last activity — Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1037; text: 2/4/2025 CR S597-598)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This Senate resolution recognizes the 80th anniversary of the amphibious landing on the Japanese island of Iwo Jima during World War II. It commemorates the historic raising of the United States flag on Mount Suribachi. The resolution honors the various service members who fought in the Battle of Iwo Jima and remembers those who died on the battlefield. Additionally, it recognizes the Allied victory that helped lead to the defeat of the Empire of Japan. Finally, the resolution celebrates the shared values and friendship between the United States and Japan.
Yes
- Scored +5
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?
The resolution reaffirms the strong and resilient alliance and bonds of friendship between the United States and Japan.
- Scored +5
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The resolution specifically honors the service members who fought at Iwo Jima and encourages the nation to recognize their sacrifice through programs and ceremonies.
- Scored +3
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
The resolution honors the service and sacrifice of those who fought at Iwo Jima and encourages commemorative programs to honor them.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Recognition of Veterans: The resolution honors the Marines, Sailors, Soldiers, Army Air Crew, and Coast Guardsmen who fought on Iwo Jima, as well as the service members who died on the battlefield. (Resolution Clauses 3 and 4)
-
Strengthening International Relations: The text reaffirms the bonds of friendship and shared values between the United States and Japan, highlighting a resilient alliance and the power of reconciliation. (Resolution Clause 7)
-
Community Engagement: The resolution encourages the people of the United States to honor veterans through appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities. (Resolution Clause 8)
-
Inspiration for Current Service Members: The document honors those serving today by connecting them to the proud traditions of those who served previously. (Resolution Clause 9)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no provisions in the provided text that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The resolution reaffirms the strong and resilient alliance and bonds of friendship between the United States and Japan. Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The resolution honors the service and sacrifice of those who fought at Iwo Jima and encourages commemorative programs to honor them.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The resolution specifically honors the service members who fought at Iwo Jima and encourages the nation to recognize their sacrifice through programs and ceremonies.
- 2/19/2025
- Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1037; text: 2/4/2025 CR S597-598)
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- 2/18/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 2/13/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 2/12/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 2/4/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
- 20 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Joni ErnstRepublican · Iowa
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HoevenRepublican · North Dakota
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Jerry MoranRepublican · Kansas
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Eric SchmittRepublican · Missouri
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts