Roger Wicker (R-MS)
A resolution recognizing the 250th birthday of the United States Navy.
A Republican resolution with 15 Democratic cosponsors · See all 27 cosponsors
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7101; text: CR S7097)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes the 250th birthday of the United States Navy. It highlights the history of the Navy starting from the Continental Congress in 1775. The text notes the Navy's role in protecting trade, maintaining freedom of navigation, and providing humanitarian aid. It also acknowledges the Navy's current size of ships, aircraft, and personnel. Finally, the Senate expresses appreciation for the service of Navy members and reaffirms its commitment to the institution.
Yes
- Scored +3
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The resolution explicitly honors the service and sacrifices of Navy veterans.
- Scored +2
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
The resolution recognizes the sacrifices made by veterans of the Navy.
- Scored +1
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?
The resolution notes the Navy's role in fostering peace and stability globally.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Recognition of service: The resolution expresses appreciation to the men and women of the Navy, both past and present, for their service and defense of the country. (Section 2)
-
Acknowledgment of sacrifices: The text recognizes the sacrifices made by Navy families, veterans, and civilians who have supported the fleet. (Whereas clause)
-
Economic and workforce support: The resolution notes that communities across the United States provide critical industrial and workforce support to sustain the fleet. (Whereas clause)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts identified: The provided text is a ceremonial resolution intended to recognize a historical milestone and express appreciation; it does not contain provisions that impose burdens or negative consequences on individuals or groups.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The resolution explicitly honors the service and sacrifices of Navy veterans.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The resolution recognizes the sacrifices made by veterans of the Navy. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The resolution notes the Navy's role in fostering peace and stability globally.
- 10/9/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7101; text: CR S7097)
- 27 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island