A Republican bill with 96 Republican cosponsors · See all 96 cosponsors
Last activity — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 8.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill provides individuals who were subjected as children to certain medical interventions, or their parents and legal guardians, with a private right of action to sue health care professionals, hospitals, and clinics in federal district court. It defines covered interventions as specific items and services, including puberty blockers, sex hormones, and surgical procedures, used to intentionally delay, halt, or disrupt natural puberty or change an individual's body to no longer correspond to their sex. The legislation sets rules for damages, including compensatory, non-economic, and punitive damages, and establishes strict liability for interventions occurring after the date of enactment. It outlines specific exclusions for certain procedures, such as treatments for verifiable disorders of sexual development or traumatic bodily injuries. Finally, the bill establishes a statute of limitations allowing actions to be brought within 25 years from the individual's eighteenth birthday or within 4 years from when the cost of detransition treatment is incurred, whichever is later.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +5
Does this give the federal government more power?
Creates a federal private right of action in district courts for medical disputes.
- Scored +4
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
Provides a legal mechanism for parents and children to seek damages for medical interventions they deem harmful.
- Scored +2
Would children be better off under this?
Provides a pathway for children to sue for damages if they feel harmed by medical transitions.
The opposite· 3 of 9
- Scored -9
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
Severely penalizes the provision of medical gender-affirming care for minors.
- Scored -8
Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people?
Creates severe legal penalties for providing gender-affirming medical care to minors.
- Scored -5
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
Restricts medical transitions for children based on biological sex definitions.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Remedies for Damaged Individuals: Individuals subjected to covered interventions as children and their parents or legal guardians are granted the ability to bring a civil action for damages against participating health care professionals, hospitals, and clinics under Section 3(a). This allows affected individuals to seek accountability and financial recovery.
-
Availability of Comprehensive Damages: Section 3(b) allows available damages to include compensatory damages for economic costs associated with undoing or correcting the intervention, non-economic damages for emotional distress and pain and suffering, and punitive damages if malicious, intentional, fraudulent, or reckless behavior is proven by clear and convincing evidence.
-
Protection for Necessary Medical Procedures: Section 2(2)(B) excludes appropriate and medically necessary procedures to treat verifiable disorders of sexual development, treatments for infections or injuries caused by prior interventions, and interventions for diagnosed and verifiable conditions like traumatic injuries, congenital structural anomalies, or acute illnesses from the definition of covered interventions. This ensures that unrelated necessary medical care is not penalized.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Burdens and Strict Liability for Providers: Section 3(c) imposes strict liability for damages on any health care professional, hospital, or clinic whose participation in a covered intervention on a child occurs after the date of enactment and is proven by clear and convincing evidence. This places a heavy legal and financial burden on medical providers.
-
Extended Vulnerability to Lawsuits: Section 5 establishes a statute of limitations allowing an action to be brought within 25 years from the date of the eighteenth birthday of the individual subjected to the intervention, or within 4 years from the time the cost of a detransition treatment is incurred, whichever is later. This exposes medical professionals and facilities to the threat of litigation for decades.
-
Retroactive Liability: Section 3(a) dictates that the cause of action is available regardless of whether the alleged covered intervention occurred before, on, or after the date of enactment of the Act. This retroactive application may create legal instability and unexpected liability for past medical practices that complied with prior standards of care.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — Creates severe legal penalties for providing gender-affirming medical care to minors. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — Restricts medical transitions for children based on biological sex definitions.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — Provides a pathway for children to sue for damages if they feel harmed by medical transitions. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Allows young adults who were transitioned as children to seek financial recovery. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Severely penalizes the provision of medical gender-affirming care for minors. Would business owners be better off under this? — Increases litigation risk and liability for healthcare business owners.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Strict liability may deter providers from offering gender-affirming care for minors. Does this lower what people pay for private health insurance? — Increased liability for providers may lead to higher malpractice insurance premiums.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Provides a legal mechanism for parents and children to seek damages for medical interventions they deem harmful. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Increases legal liability and financial risk for small clinics and medical practices.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Creates a federal private right of action in district courts for medical disputes. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Imposes a federal standard of liability that may override state-level medical protections. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Implements strict liability and places a heavy burden of proof on medical providers.
- 11/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 8.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 7/14/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 7/9/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/18/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/22/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/16/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/14/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/9/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/2/2026
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- 3/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2026
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 3/19/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/18/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 3/16/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 3/12/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/9/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 3/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/4/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 3/3/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 3/2/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 2/25/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 2/24/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 2/23/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Robert AderholtRepublican · Alabama
Mark AlfordRepublican · Missouri
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
Eric BurlisonRepublican · Missouri
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Michael BaumgartnerRepublican · Washington
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Kat CammackRepublican · Florida
John CarterRepublican · Texas
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Andrew ClydeRepublican · Georgia
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Juan CiscomaniRepublican · Arizona
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Scott DesJarlaisRepublican · Tennessee
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Pat FallonRepublican · Texas
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Scott FranklinRepublican · Florida
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Brad FinstadRepublican · Minnesota
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Julie FedorchakRepublican · North Dakota
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
H. GriffithRepublican · Virginia
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Erin HouchinRepublican · Indiana
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
David JoyceRepublican · Ohio
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Brian JackRepublican · Georgia
Trent KellyRepublican · Mississippi
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Mike KennedyRepublican · Utah
Nancy MaceRepublican · South Carolina
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah
Cory MillsRepublican · Florida
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Mark MessmerRepublican · Indiana
Riley MooreRepublican · West Virginia
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Jimmy PatronisRepublican · Florida
David RouzerRepublican · North Carolina
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
Michael SimpsonRepublican · Idaho
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
Austin ScottRepublican · Georgia
Jason SmithRepublican · Missouri
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Dale StrongRepublican · Alabama
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio
Matt Van EppsRepublican · Tennessee
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina
Daniel WebsterRepublican · Florida
Ann WagnerRepublican · Missouri
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin