Harriet M. Hageman

Became law (4)

• 

  Harriet Hageman (R-WY)· Dec 11

  Their bill

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment.

  H.J.Res. 130 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The Senate voted 51–43 on Nov 20.

  This joint resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to officially disapprove of a specific rule.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +5

    Would people in rural areas be better off under this?

    Overturning the Buffalo Field Office resource management plan affects local land use decisions that directly impact rural stakeholders.

  • Scored +5

    Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?

    The legislation exercises congressional disapproval to void a specific Bureau of Land Management resource management plan.

  The opposite

  • Scored -5

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The joint resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to block and invalidate a federal agency rule, asserting legislative oversight over executive branch rulemaking.

• 

  Mike Kennedy (R-UT)· Oct 20

  Cosponsored

  License to Drill Act

  H.R. 7831 Energy

  A Republican bill with 3 Republican cosponsors.

  Became law

  This bill amends the Mineral Leasing Act to extend the time period for the Secretary of the Interior to collect a fee for each new application for a permit to drill.

  Yes· 2 of 8

  • Scored +3

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    The bill benefits energy industry business owners by ensuring streamlined permit processing.

  • Scored +2

    Is this likely to create jobs?

    Extending drilling permit fee collection may support continued oil and gas industry activity and employment.

  The opposite· 2 of 4

  • Scored -3

    Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?

    The bill is designed to support rather than reduce fossil fuel production.

  • Scored -2

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    Expanded drilling activity may negatively impact lands of historical and cultural importance to Native communities.

• 

  Barry Moore (R-AL)· Sep 11

  Cosponsored

  Stop Secret Spending Act of 2025

  H.R. 2069 Government Operations and Politics

  A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors.

  Became law

  This bill updates previous laws to make sure that other transaction agreements are reported to USAspending.gov.

  Yes

  • Scored +8

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill significantly increases government transparency by requiring the public reporting of other transaction agreements.

  • Scored +5

    Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?

    The bill enhances fiscal oversight by increasing the transparency of federal transaction agreements.

  No question was scored the opposite.

And 1 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (25)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  Harriet Hageman (R-WY)· Mar 3

  Their bill

  To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for federally recognized Indian Tribes.

  H.R. 5910 Native Americans

  A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors.

  Passed the House

  By voice vote, no names recorded

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Indian Affairs · Mar 4

  This bill seeks to authorize the leasing of land held in trust for federally recognized Indian Tribes. It specifically amends the Act of August 9, 1955.

  Yes· 2 of 10

  • Scored +6

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    This bill provides significant economic and land management advantages to federally recognized Indian Tribes.

  • Scored +5

    Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?

    Expanding leasing authority empowers federally recognized tribes to manage and utilize their land assets more effectively.

  The opposite

  • Scored -2

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The bill expands federal authority to manage leasing terms for tribal land.

• 

  Harriet Hageman (R-WY)· May 13

  Their bill

  EARA

  H.R. 677 Government Operations and Politics

  A Republican bill with no cosponsors.

  Passed the House

  By voice vote, no names recorded

  This bill creates a process to speed up the review of certain Department of the Interior decisions. Parties can notify the Board of Land Appeals that they want an expedited review.

  Yes· 2 of 13

  • Scored +5

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Significant benefit for business owners facing costly delays in land-use approvals.

  • Scored +5

    Would farmers be better off under this?

    Highly beneficial for agricultural operators dealing with DOI land appeals.

  The opposite

  • Scored -2

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    Expediting reviews may reduce the time available for thorough environmental impact considerations.

• 

  Harriet Hageman (R-WY)· May 13

  Their bill

  To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.

  H.R. 1001 Water Resources Development

  A Republican bill with 2 Republican cosponsors.

  Passed the House

  By voice vote, no names recorded

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · May 14

  This Act directs the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Energy to enter into a memorandum of understanding.

  Yes· 2 of 5

  • Scored +3

    Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?

    It establishes a plan for managing the impacts of a record of decision on the Glen Canyon Dam and its surrounding resources.

  • Scored +3

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The bill addresses impacts on endangered species and manages infrastructure related to the Colorado River.

  No question was scored the opposite.

And 22 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would business owners be better off under this? 24 no, 81 yes. 11 of these passed a chamber (9 yes, 2 no)
• Would people in rural areas be better off under this? 7 no, 71 yes. 11 of these passed a chamber (10 yes, 1 no)
• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 39 no, 35 yes. 6 of these passed a chamber (5 yes, 1 no)
• Would children be better off under this? 11 no, 28 yes. 6 of these passed a chamber (5 yes, 1 no)

What else they would change

• Does this give the federal government more power? 38 no, 78 yes. 14 of these passed a chamber (10 yes, 4 no)
• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 14 no, 85 yes. 11 of these passed a chamber (9 yes, 2 no)
• Does this make it easier to run a small business? 8 no, 58 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber (4 yes, 1 no)
• Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? 44 no, 17 yes. 8 of these passed a chamber (2 yes, 6 no)