Andrew S. Clyde

Became law (2)

• 

  Andrew Clyde (R-GA)· May 9

  Their bill

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program for Appliance Standards: Certification Requirements, Labeling Requirements, and Enforcement Provisions for Certain Consumer Products and Commercial Equipment".

  H.J.Res. 42 Energy

  A Republican resolution with 6 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The Senate voted 52–46 on Apr 30.

  This joint resolution states that Congress disapproves of a specific rule submitted by the Department of Energy.

  The opposite· 2 of 9

  • Scored -3

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    Disapproving the rule weakens environmental protections by potentially allowing less energy-efficient appliances.

  • Scored -3

    Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?

    The disapproval of energy conservation standards could lead to appliances that use more energy, increasing carbon emissions.

  No question was scored yes.

• 

  Stephanie Bice (R-OK)· May 9

  Cosponsored

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".

  H.J.Res. 24 Energy

  A Republican resolution with 10 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The Senate voted 53–42 on Apr 3.

  This joint resolution aims to overturn a specific rule from the Department of Energy. The rule in question involves energy conservation standards for walk-in coolers and walk-in freezers.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +5

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    The reversal of energy standards reduces compliance costs and equipment prices for businesses in the food service and refrigeration sectors.

  • Scored +5

    Would farmers be better off under this?

    Farmers utilizing walk-in coolers and freezers may benefit from reduced equipment costs and easier compliance.

  The opposite· 2 of 3

  • Scored -5

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The resolution reduces environmental protections by striking down Department of Energy energy conservation standards.

  • Scored -5

    Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?

    By overturning the energy standards, the resolution likely increases carbon emissions by allowing less efficient equipment to remain in use.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (14)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  Andrew Clyde (R-GA)· Nov 19

  Their bill

  Common-Sense Law Enforcement and Accountability Now in DC Act of 2025

  H.R. 5107 Crime and Law Enforcement

  A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  The House voted 233–190 on Nov 20.

  233–190

  Now: arrived in the other chamber; nothing has happened to it there yet · Nov 20

  Its main purpose is to repeal the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 that was passed by the District of Columbia Council.

  Yes

  • Scored +6

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    Federal intervention overrides local D.C. Council legislation regarding policing standards.

  The opposite· 2 of 4

  • Scored -7

    Does this change how police departments operate?

    The bill repeals the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022, rolling back police accountability measures.

  • Scored -5

    Would Black Americans be better off under this?

    Repealing police accountability and reform measures disproportionately impacts the Black community in Washington, D.C.

• 

  Barry Loudermilk (R-GA)· Jul 16

  Cosponsored

  To name the Department of Veterans Affairs multispecialty clinic in Marietta, Georgia, as the "Colonel Michael H. Boyce Department of Veterans Affairs Multispecialty Clinic".

  H.R. 5362 Armed Forces and National Security

  A Republican bill with 5 Democratic cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  418 – 0

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Veterans' Affairs · Jul 21

  This bill proposes to officially name the Department of Veterans Affairs multispecialty clinic located in Marietta, Georgia, after Colonel Michael H. Boyce. The clinic is situated at 1263 Cobb Parkway NW.

  Yes· 2 of 4

  • Scored +1

    Would people over 65 be better off under this?

    The bill honors a veteran's legacy through a clinical facility that serves the veteran community.

  • Scored +1

    Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?

    The bill honors the service of Colonel Mike Boyce by naming a VA clinic after him.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Riley Moore (R-WV)· Jul 14

  Cosponsored

  Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act

  H.R. 1181 Finance and Financial Sector

  A Republican bill with 132 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  221 – 201

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Jul 15

  This bill prohibits payment card networks and covered entities from using specific merchant category codes to distinguish firearms retailers from other types of retailers.

  Yes· 2 of 4

  • Scored +6

    Does this protect the right to own guns?

    The bill protects the privacy of firearms transactions which supports the ability to conduct lawful gun commerce.

  • Scored +5

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Firearms retailers are protected from being uniquely identified by their merchant category codes.

  The opposite

  • Scored -7

    Does this leave more decisions to the states?

    The bill preempts state and local laws that regulate the assignment or use of merchant category codes for firearms retailers.

And 11 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 62 no, 15 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber
• Would business owners be better off under this? 9 no, 45 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber
• Would women be better off under this? 29 no, 12 yes. 1 of these passed a chamber
• Would immigrants be better off under this? 35 no, 2 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber

What else they would change

• Does this give the federal government more power? 31 no, 42 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber (3 yes, 2 no)
• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 15 no, 44 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (2 yes, 2 no)
• Does this leave more decisions to the states? 22 no, 26 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 2 no)
• Does this make it easier to run a small business? 5 no, 35 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber