Blake D. Moore

Became law (4)

• 

  Blake Moore (R-UT)· Dec 26

  Their bill

  MAPWaters Act of 2025

  H.R. 187 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The House voted 413–0 on Jan 22.

  This bill requires Federal land and water management agencies to standardize and digitize data regarding public outdoor recreational use of Federal waterways.

  Yes· 2 of 17

  • Scored +7

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    Requires digitization and public online availability of previously fragmented waterway access and restriction data.

  • Scored +5

    Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?

    Standardizes and digitizes recreational data across multiple federal land management agencies.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Pete Stauber (R-MN)· Dec 12

  Cosponsored

  Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act

  H.R. 452 Sports and Recreation

  A Republican bill with 107 Democratic cosponsors.

  Became law

  This Act authorizes the award of 3 Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team. The medals recognize the team's victory over the Soviet Union during the 1980 Winter Olympics.

  Yes

  • Scored +1

    Is this likely to grow the economy?

    The sale of duplicate bronze medals provides a small influx of revenue to the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Steve Scalise (R-LA)· Jul 24

  Cosponsored

  Rescissions Act of 2025

  H.R. 4 Economics and Public Finance

  A Republican bill with 5 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The Senate voted 51–48 on Jul 17.

  The Rescissions Act of 2025 cancels various budget authorizations as proposed by the President on June 3, 2025.

  The opposite· 2 of 15

  • Scored -5

    Does this make birth control easier to get?

    The bill rescinds $500,000,000 from Global Health Programs and explicitly notes that protections do not apply to family planning and reproductive health programs.

  • Scored -3

    Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster?

    Rescinding funds from International Disaster Assistance could negatively impact disaster relief efforts.

  No question was scored yes.

And 1 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Passed Congress — the President's turn (2)

Both chambers passed it. The President signs it into law or vetoes it, and a veto stands unless two-thirds of each chamber vote to pass it anyway. Everything Congress has sent the President →

• 

  Blake Moore (R-UT)· Nov 10

  Their bill

  To expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.

  H.R. 4930 Foreign Trade and International Finance

  A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors.

  Passed both chambers

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  This bill updates the Tariff Act of 1930 to change how information is shared regarding suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.

  Yes· 2 of 4

  • Scored +6

    Does this make patent and copyright rules fairer?

    The bill strengthens the ability to identify and act upon suspected intellectual property violations in the trade stream.

  • Scored +5

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Business owners who hold intellectual property rights benefit from more robust information sharing to combat counterfeits.

  The opposite

  • Scored -4

    Does this protect people from being watched or searched?

    The bill expands the scope of nonpublic information that can be shared with third parties involved in the interest of merchandise.

  • Scored -2

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill allows for the sharing of previously nonpublic information obtained from private entities like online marketplaces.

• 

  Lloyd Smucker (R-PA)· Sep 29

  Cosponsored

  Claiming Age Clarity Act

  H.R. 5284 Social Welfare

  A Republican bill with 3 Democratic cosponsors.

  Passed both chambers

  With no one objecting, no names recorded

  This bill requires the Social Security Administration to update the terminology used in its rules, regulations, guidance, and other materials.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +2

    Would people over 65 be better off under this?

    The bill provides clearer terminology regarding retirement and benefit ages for seniors.

  • Scored +2

    Would retired people be better off under this?

    The updated terminology provides more clarity for retirees regarding their monthly benefit ages.

  No question was scored the opposite.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (18)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  Blake Moore (R-UT)· Dec 15

  Their bill

  University of Utah Research Park Act

  H.R. 2876 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with 3 Republican cosponsors.

  Passed the House

  By voice vote, no names recorded

  Now: arrived in the other chamber; nothing has happened to it there yet · Dec 16

  This Act aims to confirm the use of specific non-Federal land in Salt Lake City, Utah, for public purposes. It focuses on approximately 593.54 acres of land previously conveyed to the University of Utah.

  Yes· 2 of 12

  • Scored +3

    Would students be better off under this?

    The bill directly facilitates student housing and research opportunities.

  • Scored +3

    Is this likely to grow the economy?

    Confirming land use for a research park and transit hub supports regional economic activity.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Blake Moore (R-UT)· Jan 21

  Their bill

  Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act

  H.R. 186 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  The House voted 414–0 on Jan 22.

  414–0

  This Act authorizes the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to establish a commemorative work on the National Mall. The purpose is to honor the valor, selfless service, and sacrifice of Medal of Honor recipients.

  Yes

  • Scored +7

    Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?

    The bill directly honors the service and sacrifice of Medal of Honor recipients.

  • Scored +5

    Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?

    The bill honors the legacy and sacrifice of military personnel through a national monument.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Jefferson Shreve (R-IN)· Sep 2

  Cosponsored

  Protecting Domestic Mining Act of 2025

  H.R. 1501 Energy

  A Republican bill with 2 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  218 – 201

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs · Sep 14

  This bill aims to amend the FAST Act. It seeks to include specific mineral production activities as covered projects. Specifically, it adds "mining, mineral processing" to the definition of a covered project.

  Yes· 2 of 10

  • Scored +5

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Mining and mineral processing companies benefit significantly from streamlined permitting processes.

  • Scored +4

    Would people in rural areas be better off under this?

    Mining projects often bring investment and infrastructure to rural communities.

  The opposite· 2 of 5

  • Scored -5

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    Increased mining activity often negatively impacts indigenous lands and tribal sovereignty.

  • Scored -4

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    Streamlining permits and blocking certain regulatory rules may reduce the rigor of environmental oversight.

And 15 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 16 no, 99 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (3 yes, 1 no)
• Would business owners be better off under this? 18 no, 93 yes. 9 of these passed a chamber
• Would middle-income households be better off under this? 2 no, 59 yes. 1 of these passed a chamber
• Would people in rural areas be better off under this? 0 no, 61 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber

What else they would change

• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 5 no, 79 yes. 9 of these passed a chamber (7 yes, 2 no)
• Is this likely to grow the economy? 3 no, 69 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber
• Does this make it easier to run a small business? 5 no, 66 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber
• Does this give the federal government more power? 14 no, 52 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber (2 yes, 1 no)