Robert F. Onder, Jr.

Became law (1)

• 

  Robert Onder (R-MO)· Nov 10

  Their bill

  America's National Churchill Museum National Historic Landmark Act

  H.R. 1945 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor.

  Became law

  This bill designates America's National Churchill Museum, located at Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri, as a National Historic Landmark.

  Yes· 2 of 4

  • Scored +5

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The bill allows the Secretary of the Interior to enter into agreements for protecting historic resources at the Landmark.

  • Scored +4

    Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?

    The bill mandates a study to determine the feasibility of making the site a unit of the National Park System.

  No question was scored the opposite.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (25)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  Robert Onder (R-MO)· Aug 31

  Their bill

  To make technical amendments to title 49, United States Code, as necessary to improve the Code.

  H.R. 4523 Transportation and Public Works

  A Republican bill with no cosponsors.

  Passed the House

  By voice vote, no names recorded

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary · Sep 14

  This Act aims to make technical amendments to title 49 of the United States Code. The primary purpose is to improve the Code through these technical adjustments.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +1

    Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?

    Technical improvements to transportation finance code marginally facilitate better administration of public transit loans.

  • Scored +1

    Does this repair or build roads and bridges?

    Technical improvements to the transportation finance code marginally facilitate better administration of infrastructure loans.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Robert Onder (R-MO)· Sep 8

  Their bill

  SPACE Act of 2025

  H.R. 3424 Government Operations and Politics

  A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  397 – 1

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Environment and Public Works · Sep 9

  This act directs the Administrator of the General Services Administration to work with Federal tenants regarding shared-space arrangements.

  Yes

  • Scored +3

    Does this reduce what the federal government spends?

    The bill promotes space-sharing and collocating among federal agencies, which aims to optimize the use of existing government property and potentially reduce leasing costs.

  • Scored +2

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill requires the GSA Administrator to brief House and Senate committees on the implementation of space-sharing requirements.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  H. Griffith (R-VA)· Nov 11

  Cosponsored

  Efficient Nuclear Licensing Hearings Act

  H.R. 5549 Energy

  A Republican bill with 4 Democratic cosponsors.

  Passed the House

  By voice vote, no names recorded

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Environment and Public Works · Nov 12

  This bill amends the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to change how hearings are handled for nuclear facility construction applications and licenses.

  Yes

  • Scored +2

    Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power?

    Streamlining nuclear licensing processes may facilitate easier expansion of nuclear energy infrastructure.

  The opposite

  • Scored -4

    Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?

    The bill reduces due process by making hearings contingent upon a specific request rather than being a required part of the proceeding.

  • Scored -3

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill reduces transparency by allowing the Commission to dispense with certain notice and publication requirements for amendments.

And 22 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 30 no, 42 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber (4 yes, 1 no)
• Would business owners be better off under this? 14 no, 51 yes. 7 of these passed a chamber (5 yes, 2 no)
• Would middle-income households be better off under this? 6 no, 30 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber
• Would union members be better off under this? 16 no, 17 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (3 yes, 1 no)

What else they would change

• Does this give the federal government more power? 15 no, 50 yes. 7 of these passed a chamber
• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 5 no, 46 yes. 12 of these passed a chamber (11 yes, 1 no)
• Does this make health care easier to get in general? 10 no, 33 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber
• Does this make it easier to run a small business? 4 no, 27 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 1 no)