Julie Fedorchak

Became law (3)

• 

  Julie Fedorchak (R-ND)· Dec 11

  Their bill

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".

  H.J.Res. 105 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican resolution with no cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The Senate voted 50–45 on Oct 9.

  This joint resolution aims to disapprove a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management. The rule concerns the "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan."

  Yes· 2 of 6

  • Scored +1

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    The disapproval of the management plan may reduce regulatory constraints on business operations in the North Dakota area.

  • Scored +1

    Would people in rural areas be better off under this?

    The removal of the land management plan may allow for more varied economic and resource use in rural North Dakota.

  The opposite

  • Scored -5

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The resolution nullifies the Bureau of Land Management's resource management plan which likely contains environmental protections for the North Dakota region.

• 

  Pete Stauber (R-MN)· Dec 12

  Cosponsored

  Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act

  H.R. 452 Sports and Recreation

  A Republican bill with 107 Democratic cosponsors.

  Became law

  This Act authorizes the award of 3 Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team. The medals recognize the team's victory over the Soviet Union during the 1980 Winter Olympics.

  Yes

  • Scored +1

    Is this likely to grow the economy?

    The sale of duplicate bronze medals provides a small influx of revenue to the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  August Pfluger (R-TX)· Mar 14

  Cosponsored

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions".

  H.J.Res. 35 Environmental Protection

  A Republican resolution with 19 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The Senate voted 52–47 on Feb 27.

  This is a joint resolution from the 119th Congress. It seeks to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency.

  Yes· 2 of 5

  • Scored +5

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    The resolution benefits energy industry owners by eliminating a specific compliance charge and its associated procedures.

  • Scored +3

    Does this make it easier to run a small business?

    Preventing the emissions charge reduces the regulatory and financial compliance burden on energy-related businesses.

  The opposite· 2 of 4

  • Scored -6

    Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?

    The resolution removes the regulatory mechanisms designed to penalize and reduce methane and other waste emissions from petroleum and natural gas systems.

  • Scored -5

    Does this raise the taxes companies pay?

    The resolution prevents the implementation of a waste emissions charge on petroleum and natural gas systems, which would have functioned as a tax on those industries.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (24)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  Julie Fedorchak (R-ND)· Sep 15

  Their bill

  High-Capacity Grid Act

  H.R. 6633 Energy

  A Republican bill with 4 Republican cosponsors.

  Passed the House

  By voice vote, no names recorded

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Sep 16

  This bill requires public utilities to use the best-available transmission conductor class for certain covered projects.

  Yes· 2 of 8

  • Scored +4

    Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power?

    Facilitates better transmission capacity which supports the integration of renewable energy sources.

  • Scored +4

    Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?

    Promotes high-efficiency transmission conductors that reduce energy loss and improve grid capacity for clean energy integration.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Julie Fedorchak (R-ND)· Sep 14

  Their bill

  To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 840 Front Street in Casselton, North Dakota, as the "Commander Delbert Austin Olson Post Office".

  H.R. 1830 Government Operations and Politics

  A Republican bill with no cosponsors.

  Passed the House

  Since then: a Senate committee approved it and sent it to the floor

  Now: in the queue for a floor vote, with no date set · Sep 14

  This bill designates a specific United States Postal Service facility located at 840 Front Street in Casselton, North Dakota, as the Commander Delbert Austin Olson Post Office.

  Yes

  • Scored +2

    Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?

    Honors a Commander, which is a military rank, potentially benefiting the veteran community's recognition.

  • Scored +1

    Would people in rural areas be better off under this?

    Provides a named post office facility in the rural town of Casselton, North Dakota.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Julie Fedorchak (R-ND)· May 19

  Their bill

  North Dakota Trust Lands Completion Act of 2026

  H.R. 2252 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with no cosponsors.

  Passed the House

  By voice vote, no names recorded

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · May 20

  This bill allows the State of North Dakota to trade certain state land grant parcels for unappropriated Federal land.

  Yes· 2 of 10

  • Scored +6

    Would Native Americans be better off under this?

    The bill provides a mechanism for Indian Tribes to have State land grant parcels taken into trust for their benefit.

  • Scored +5

    Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?

    The bill allows for the restoration of land to Indian Tribes by taking certain parcels into trust for their benefit.

  No question was scored the opposite.

And 21 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would business owners be better off under this? 8 no, 49 yes. 10 of these passed a chamber (9 yes, 1 no)
• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 17 no, 35 yes. 6 of these passed a chamber (4 yes, 2 no)
• Would people in rural areas be better off under this? 3 no, 38 yes. 9 of these passed a chamber
• Would middle-income households be better off under this? 3 no, 23 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber

What else they would change

• Does this give the federal government more power? 11 no, 37 yes. 7 of these passed a chamber (6 yes, 1 no)
• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 5 no, 43 yes. 13 of these passed a chamber (12 yes, 1 no)
• Does this make it easier to run a small business? 4 no, 38 yes. 8 of these passed a chamber (7 yes, 1 no)
• Is this likely to grow the economy? 2 no, 31 yes. 6 of these passed a chamber