Jon Husted (R-OH)
A bill to amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, and for other purposes.
A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Held at the desk.
Passed one chamber, waiting for the other to take it up
Passed one chamber, and the other has not yet sent it to a committee or put it on its calendar.
The other chamber will hand it to a committee, place it on its calendar, or leave it where it is. Nothing has been decided, and a bill can sit here indefinitely.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed Senate unanimous consent
- Awaiting House
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This bill amends the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992. Its purpose is to adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park. Specifically, it adds about 1 acre of land located in Dayton, Ohio. This land is shown as the Proposed Addition on a specific map dated February 2023. The Senate passed this bill on November 10, 2026.
Yes
- Scored +3
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
The bill expands the land area of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park.
- Scored +1
Does this invest in rural communities?
The addition of park land can support local heritage sites in the Dayton area.
- Scored +1
Would people in cities be better off under this?
The land addition occurs within the city of Dayton, Ohio.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 1: This section adjusts the park boundary to include about 1 acre of land in Dayton, Ohio. This might be considered positive because it expands the national historical park, which can help preserve local history and benefit the community.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that cause negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The bill expands the land area of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park. Does this invest in rural communities? — The addition of park land can support local heritage sites in the Dayton area.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in cities be better off under this? — The land addition occurs within the city of Dayton, Ohio.
The version one chamber actually passed
What changed from Introduced in Senate: No change to the wording. Only the printed details that record the bill’s progress, such as the heading and dates, are different.
- 11/12/2026
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 11/10/2026
- Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5562; text: CR S5562)
- 7/24/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio