Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
A resolution recognizing the heritage, culture, and contributions of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian women in the United States.
A Republican resolution with 25 Democratic cosponsors · See all 33 cosponsors
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1864; text: CR S1876-1877)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This Senate resolution recognizes the heritage, culture, and various contributions of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian women in the United States. It highlights their significant roles in military service, public service, and various professional industries. The text provides historical examples of women who excelled in science, medicine, law, and the arts. It also notes their leadership in protecting tribal rights and cultural traditions. Finally, the resolution calls for continued investment to address barriers regarding healthcare, justice, and economic opportunities.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +3
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The resolution explicitly recognizes and honors the heritage and contributions of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian people.
- Scored +3
Would women be better off under this?
The resolution focuses on celebrating and protecting the interests of Native women.
- Scored +2
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The resolution promotes equity by recognizing the historical contributions and current needs of Native women.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Recognition of Achievement: The resolution celebrates the successes and contributions of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian women to the United States. (Resolution, Section 1)
-
Focus on Safety and Interests: The resolution recognizes the importance of providing for the safety and upholding the interests of these women. (Resolution, Section 2)
-
Identification of Future Needs: The text identifies specific areas where the United States should continue to invest to address barriers faced by these women, including access to justice, access to health care, and opportunities for educational and economic advancement. (Whereas clauses)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Identified: The provided text does not contain any provisions that would result in negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly recognizes and honors the heritage and contributions of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian people. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution focuses on celebrating and protecting the interests of Native women. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The resolution highlights the historical and contemporary military service of Native women.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The text explicitly addresses overcoming gender barriers and upholding the interests of Native women. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution promotes equity by recognizing the historical contributions and current needs of Native women.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The resolution calls for continued investment in access to justice for Native women.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution highlights the need for continued investment to address healthcare barriers faced by Native women.
- 3/26/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1864; text: CR S1876-1877)
- 33 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
John HoevenRepublican · North Dakota
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts