John Hoeven (R-ND)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions".
A Republican resolution with 26 Republican cosponsors · See all 26 cosponsors
Last activity — Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
How Congress voted
- See who voted how →A vote on whether to start debating something · 02/26/2025
What this bill would do
This joint resolution aims to overturn a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. The targeted rule concerns "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions." If passed, this resolution would declare that the EPA rule has no force or effect. The resolution was introduced by Mr. Hoeven and several other senators. It has been placed on the calendar in the Senate.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +6
Would business owners be better off under this?
The resolution eliminates a specific regulatory charge targeting petroleum and natural gas system operators.
- Scored +4
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
Lowering the regulatory burden on energy systems can help stabilize energy costs in rural areas where fossil fuel reliance is higher.
- Scored +3
Would farmers be better off under this?
Reducing energy-related regulatory costs may lower input costs for agricultural operations relying on gas and petroleum.
The opposite· 3 of 5
- Scored -8
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
The resolution stops the EPA from charging for waste emissions, which reduces the financial incentive to limit methane and other greenhouse gases from petroleum systems.
- Scored -7
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The resolution nullifies a rule designed to regulate and penalize waste emissions from energy production.
- Scored -7
Does this raise the taxes companies pay?
The resolution prevents the implementation of a waste emissions charge on petroleum and natural gas systems, which would have functioned as a tax on those industries.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
None of them settled the bill — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.
- The Senate: a vote on whether to start debating something This decides only whether the chamber takes the measure up at all. Nothing about the measure itself has been decided when it passes. Motion to Proceed Agreed to 52 yes · 47 no
02/26/2025 · Roll call 96 · recorded as “On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 12”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
The provided text does not list specific positive outcomes or benefits for individuals or groups.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The provided text does not list specific negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — The resolution stops the EPA from charging for waste emissions, which reduces the financial incentive to limit methane and other greenhouse gases from petroleum systems. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The resolution nullifies a rule designed to regulate and penalize waste emissions from energy production. Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced? — By removing the emissions charge, the resolution makes it less costly for fossil fuel companies to continue current production levels.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The resolution eliminates a specific regulatory charge targeting petroleum and natural gas system operators. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Lowering the regulatory burden on energy systems can help stabilize energy costs in rural areas where fossil fuel reliance is higher. Would farmers be better off under this? — Reducing energy-related regulatory costs may lower input costs for agricultural operations relying on gas and petroleum. Would high-income households be better off under this? — The removal of industry-wide emission charges may help maintain lower energy prices for all, including higher earners.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The resolution removes a regulatory cost burden related to emissions compliance for energy-related businesses. Does this raise the taxes companies pay? — The resolution prevents the implementation of a waste emissions charge on petroleum and natural gas systems, which would have functioned as a tax on those industries. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — By overturning the EPA rule, the resolution prevents the government from collecting revenue through emissions charges.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The resolution uses congressional authority to check the power of a federal agency.
- 2/27/2025
- Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1413)
- Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent.
- 2/26/2025
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 47. Record Vote Number: 96. (CR S1391)
- Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S1391)
- 2/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/20/2025
- Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 14.
- 2/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- 24 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Markwayne MullinRepublican · Oklahoma
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
Rand PaulRepublican · Kentucky
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi