A Republican bill with 23 Republican cosponsors · See all 23 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act," seeks to amend title X of the Public Health Service Act. It would prohibit the Secretary from providing assistance under this title to any entity that performs abortions. To receive assistance, an entity must certify that it will not perform abortions or provide funds to any other entity that performs them. The bill includes exceptions for abortions resulting from rape or incest, or those where a physician certifies the woman faces danger of death. Hospitals are also exempted from this prohibition provided they do not fund non-hospital entities that perform abortions.
Yes
- Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires the Secretary to submit an annual report to Congress including specific data on abortions performed under exceptions.
The opposite· 3 of 6
- Scored -7
Does this make abortion easier to get?
The bill prohibits Title X assistance to any entity that performs abortions, which restricts access to reproductive health services.
- Scored -6
Would women be better off under this?
The bill restricts access to abortion services and family planning through the removal of federal funding for many providers.
- Scored -5
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
The restriction on reproductive health funding disproportionately affects women's control over their reproductive health.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Exceptions for specific circumstances: The bill allows for abortions in cases of rape or incest, or when a physician certifies a woman faces a physical disorder, injury, or illness that could lead to death (Section 2(b)).
-
Hospital exemptions: Hospitals are not subject to the prohibition as long as they do not fund non-hospital entities that perform abortions (Section 2(c)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restriction on assistance: The Secretary is prohibited from providing assistance under title X to any entity that performs abortions or provides funds to entities that perform them (Section 2(a)).
-
Broad definition of entity: The prohibition applies to the entire legal entity, including any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the recipient (Section 2(e)(1)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Does this make abortion easier to get? — The bill prohibits Title X assistance to any entity that performs abortions, which restricts access to reproductive health services. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — By disqualifying entities that perform abortions from receiving federal family planning grants, the bill may reduce the availability of health services in certain communities.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The bill restricts access to abortion services and family planning through the removal of federal funding for many providers. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill reduces the availability of federal funds for family planning services which are often utilized by underserved populations.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The restriction on reproductive health funding disproportionately affects women's control over their reproductive health. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Limiting federal assistance for family planning may increase the financial burden on low-income families seeking reproductive care.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the Secretary to submit an annual report to Congress including specific data on abortions performed under exceptions.
- 7/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/16/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 18 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
Josh HawleyRepublican · Missouri
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Roger MarshallRepublican · Kansas
James RischRepublican · Idaho
Tim ScottRepublican · South Carolina
Rick ScottRepublican · Florida
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana