Maggie Hassan (D-NH)· Oct 9, 2025
S.Amdt. 2928: To make certain spouses eligible for services under the disabled veterans' outreach program.
Adopted
By voice vote, no names recorded
Roger Wicker (R-MS)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
S. 2296 · Senate bill Armed Forces and National Security
A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Held at the desk.
Passed one chamber, waiting for the other to take it up
Passed one chamber, and the other has not yet sent it to a committee or put it on its calendar.
The other chamber will hand it to a committee, place it on its calendar, or leave it where it is. Nothing has been decided, and a bill can sit here indefinitely.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed Senate 77–20
- Awaiting House
What this bill would do
This legislation authorizes funding and personnel for the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy's national security activities, and military construction for fiscal year 2026. It includes the Intelligence Authorization Act, the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025, and the ROAD to Housing Act. The bill addresses global security, specifically countering threats from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, while overseeing nuclear stockpile modernization. Additionally, it provides extensive updates to military healthcare, family support, and affordable housing initiatives. It also implements various public safety measures, including child exploitation prevention and disaster recovery programs.
Yes· 3 of 83
- Scored +10
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Extensive focus on affordable housing, rental assistance, food assistance, and targeted disaster recovery grants.
- Scored +10
Does this make housing cost less?
Comprehensive expansion of modular housing, rental assistance, and attainable housing for low-to-moderate income families.
- Scored +9
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
Massive improvements in healthcare access, disability benefit exclusions for housing, and record transitions.
The opposite· 3 of 10
- Scored -10
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?
Massively increases spending on nuclear deterrence, procurement, and intelligence activities.
- Scored -8
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
Prohibits funding for sex change surgeries and repeals pronoun identification requirements.
- Scored -8
Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people?
Explicitly prohibits funding for sex change surgeries and repeals requirements for personal pronouns.
What Congress actually voted on
3 recorded votes have been taken on this bill. One of them decided something; the rest moved it along.
- The Senate: the vote on whether to pass the bill This is the real decision in this chamber. Passing here sends the bill to the other chamber, which must pass it too before it can go to the President. Passed 77 yes · 20 no
10/09/2025 · Roll call 570 · recorded as “On Passage of the Bill S. 2296”
- The Senate: a vote to end debate and allow a final vote In the Senate, debate can continue indefinitely unless 60 senators vote to end it. This vote is that attempt. It decides whether the Senate may vote on the thing at all — not whether the thing passes. A failed cloture vote usually ends the matter without anyone ever voting on its merits. Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to 84 yes · 14 no
09/02/2025 · Roll call 500 · recorded as “On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed S. 2296”
- The Senate: a vote on whether to start debating something This decides only whether the chamber takes the measure up at all. Nothing about the measure itself has been decided when it passes. Motion to Proceed Agreed to 83 yes · 13 no
09/04/2025 · Roll call 503 · recorded as “On the Motion to Proceed S. 2296”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Healthcare and Family Support: Expands hearing aid eligibility for children of retired members (Sec. 702), provides fertility treatment coverage (Sec. 705), and creates a pilot program for food coupons for junior enlisted members (Sec. 5621).
- Housing and Community Development: The "ROAD to Housing Act" increases housing supply via zoning reform (Section 5203), provides grants for whole-home repairs for seniors and disabled individuals (Section 5204), and funds the conversion of abandoned buildings into attainable housing (Section 5212).
- Environmental Health and Safety: Mandates bottled water and filtration for communities with DoD-related PFAS contamination (Sec. 317, 320(b)(2)), prohibits open-air burn pits for hazardous waste (Sec. 313(b)), and funds the removal of lead-based paint and mold in training facilities (Sec. 5505, 5506).
- Veteran and Member Care: Expands health records to include all exposures (Sec. 1065), increases access to care at military facilities (Sec. 724), and provides an identity for remotely piloted aircraft crew to access VA benefits (Sec. 524).
- Child and Human Rights Protection: Enhances the National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention (Sec. 1093), opposes the use of commercial spyware against journalists and minority groups (Sec. 5305), and supports the recovery of abducted Ukrainian children (Sec. 1266).
- Educational and Career Opportunities: Provides separate research funding solicitations for HBCUs, TCUs, and Minority-Serving Institutions (Sec. 211) and creates pathways for military members to transition into civilian advanced manufacturing jobs (Sec. 220B(b)(4)(I)).
- Public Safety: Provides fentanyl exposure containment devices for first responders (Sec. 1091) and mandates naloxone availability at Coast Guard clinics and cutters (Sec. 5136).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Medical and Social Restrictions: Prohibits the use of funds for sex change surgeries (Sec. 706) and bans the consideration of race, sex, color, ethnicity, national origin, or religion in service academy admissions (Sec. 547).
- Academic and Professional Limitations: Prohibits contracts between DoD-funded higher education institutions and "covered nations" or "foreign entities of concern" (Sec. 216) and limits collaboration with certain academic institutions (Sec. 220C).
- Privacy and Surveillance Concerns: Grants authority to intercept communications from unmanned aircraft (Sec. 350), implements wastewater monitoring for drug use at military installations (Sec. 723), and increases user activity monitoring on unclassified networks (Section 1557(a)).
- Financial and Investment Burdens: Imposes civil penalties up to $250,000 for violating investment prohibitions in the FIGHT China Act (Section 801(e)(6)(B)) and may force the divestment of securities in certain Chinese companies (Section 1731(b)).
- Civil Liberty and Legal Risks: Increases prison sentences for crimes coordinated with foreign governments (Sec. 6072-6077) and limits legal recourse for radiation exposure injuries to specific federal remedies (Sec. 5824).
- Trade and Resource Disruptions: Prohibits the sale and procurement of seafood from China (Sec. 628), which may limit food availability in military commissaries.
- High Taxpayer Costs: Authorizes billions of dollars for nuclear modernization, ICBM maintenance (Sec. 1511(b)), and the procurement of high-cost weaponry like the F-35 and Columbia Class Submarine (Sec. 4101).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Extensive focus on affordable housing, rental assistance, food assistance, and targeted disaster recovery grants. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Provides targeted funding for home accessibility modifications and special education resources. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Heavy focus on rural housing service reform, rural vouchers, and community development initiatives. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Massive improvements in healthcare access, disability benefit exclusions for housing, and record transitions. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — High positive impact via Native CDFI Relending Program and specific grant eligibility for tribal housing. Would children be better off under this? — Expands hearing aid eligibility, enhances child exploitation prevention, and supports JROTC. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Targets accessibility modifications and aging-in-place grants for older adults. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Focuses on urban infill, conversion of abandoned buildings, and transit-oriented development. Would women be better off under this? — Comprehensive improvements to sexual assault prevention, menopause health research, and support for home-based childcare. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Targets precommissioning at HBCUs and combats appraisal discrimination. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Targets precommissioning at minority-serving institutions and supports divided family reunions. Would business owners be better off under this? — Creates significant opportunities for defense, space, and construction contractors. Would farmers be better off under this? — Improves rural housing loan programs and provides supports for farm laborers' housing. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Targets precommissioning at HSIs and combats appraisal discrimination. Would students be better off under this? — Increases supports for JROTC, Coast Guard Academy cadets, and university research collaborations. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Creates pathways into advanced manufacturing and provides significant tuition assistance and attainable housing. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Focuses on attainable housing and improved transparency in the home appraisal process. Would retired people be better off under this? — Improves housing, health benefits, and retirement waiver flexibility for military and public safety officers. Would union members be better off under this? — Investment in domestic shipbuilding and construction supports skilled trade unions. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Focuses on health research for mid-life women and provides mortgage counseling. Would white Americans be better off under this? — General increase in housing supply and rural housing options. Would immigrants be better off under this? — Balances increased border security with visa exemptions for children and improved consular processing. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Balances revenue increases for major defense corporations against penalties for violating the FIGHT China Act. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Prohibits funding for sex change surgeries and repeals pronoun identification requirements. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Imposes restrictions on investments in certain Chinese technology sectors. Would men be better off under this? — Restricts male participation in designated female athletic programs at academies. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Limits capital allocation to covered foreign persons and prohibited technologies.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — Comprehensive expansion of modular housing, rental assistance, and attainable housing for low-to-moderate income families. Is this likely to reduce homelessness? — Implements systemic reforms to the Continuum of Care program and supports reentry housing. Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — Provides significant funding for home accessibility modifications and special education staffing. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Provides food coupons for junior enlisted and increases resources for very low-income families via vouchers. Does this tighten control of the border? — Increases DoD support for CBP, enhances maritime domain awareness, and manages land port of entry permitting. Does this make child care cost less? — Expands Child Development Centers at military bases and supports home-based providers via eased loan restrictions. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — Implements protections against sexual misconduct, maternity allowances, and targeted health research for women. Does this protect the right to vote? — Mandates penetration testing and vulnerability disclosure to secure election systems. Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life? — Strengthens whistleblower protections and supports independent media in partner regions. Does this protect the freedom to practise a religion? — Establishes a CIA Chaplain Corps and protects chaplains' religious beliefs. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Combats appraisal discrimination and funds HBCUs/MSIs, though offset by bans on race-conscious admissions. Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — Provides visa limit exemptions for certain children of naturalized parents. Does this strengthen Social Security? — Improves coordination of death data to prevent improper Social Security payments. Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — Explicitly prohibits funding for sex change surgeries and repeals requirements for personal pronouns. Does this shorten or soften prison sentences? — Imposes significant sentence enhancements for crimes coordinated with foreign governments.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster? — Establishes a Long-Term Disaster Recovery Fund and an Office of Disaster Management and Resiliency. Does this invest in rural communities? — Establishes Rural Community Development Initiatives and modernizes Rural Housing Service IT. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Mandates comprehensive actions for PFAS contamination and prohibits hazardous waste burn pits. Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — Promotes transit-oriented development and prioritizes railway infrastructure for regional connectivity. Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — Prioritizes regional infrastructure projects in the Western Balkans and installation-specific construction. Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power? — Facilitates transition to renewables, authorizes microgrid/battery storage, and onshores critical minerals. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — Promotes deployment of advanced nuclear reactors and sustainable building materials. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — Provides frameworks for DOE real property utilization and cooperative agreements with Tribes. Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced? — Aims to decrease dependence on Russian fossil fuels in partner regions.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — Establishes comprehensive AI cybersecurity frameworks, quantum readiness, and mandatory breach reporting. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — Strongly bolsters alliances with NATO, AUKUS, and Indo-Pacific partners through shared industrial bases. Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad? — Creates new frameworks for engagement in the Western Balkans, Indo-Pacific, and dialogue with North Korea. Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — Expands benefit access for RPA crews and improves medical record transitions between Coast Guard and VA. Does this put more money into stopping terrorism? — Expands the National Counterterrorism Center's mission and funds counter-IED and special operations. Does this send more money or help to other countries? — Provides significant security and economic assistance to Ukraine, Taiwan, and the Baltic states. Does this make trade with other countries easier? — Develops strategies for civil nuclear exports and initiates pilot programs to remove barriers to commerce in partner countries. Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country? — Increases network monitoring and grants authority to intercept communications from UAVs. Does this reduce what is spent on the military? — Massively increases spending on nuclear deterrence, procurement, and intelligence activities.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — Extensive funding for AI, quantum networking, biotechnology, and nuclear physics. Does this put more into space exploration? — Authorizes significant funding for Space Force technology and promotes the commercial space sector. Does this make college cost less? — Expands tuition assistance and financial aid for college student precommissioning initiatives. Does this give people more control over their personal data? — Prohibits data brokers from selling personal info of at-risk government individuals and protects multiomic data. Does this make patent and copyright rules fairer? — Mandates government ownership of operational data in nonproprietary formats to prevent vendor lock-in. Does this get reliable internet to more people? — Focuses on improving ICT infrastructure and digital accessibility in partner nations. Does this reduce what student borrowers owe or repay? — Extends loan repayment authorities for health professionals in the Selected Reserve. Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — Implements strict export controls and requires AI vendors to provide access to models for security research. Does this put more money into public schools? — Allocates impact aid to local educational agencies benefiting military dependents.
- Healthcare
- Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — Mandates naloxone availability in Coast Guard/DoD and funds school-community drug prevention grants. Does this help veterans get medical care? — Significantly expands access to DoD facilities, telehealth, toxic exposure documentation, and female veteran-specific research. Does this put more money into medical research? — Allocates massive funding for AI, biotechnology, nuclear physics, and performance medicine. Does this make mental health care easier to get? — Expands behavioral health technician programs, PTSD exams, and research into women's mid-life mental health. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Provides fertility treatments for active duty and coordinates healthcare with supportive services for the homeless. Does this make the country readier for the next outbreak? — Establishes strategic infectious disease research plans, biomanufacturing strategies, and COVID-19 origin reviews. Does this put more money into Medicare, the health coverage for people over 65? — Provides funding for Medicare-eligible retiree health care fund contributions. Does this make abortion easier to get? — Prohibits funding for sex change surgeries and aligns with restrictive medical funding.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make elections run better? — Establishes coordinated vulnerability disclosure programs and penetration testing for voting systems. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Mandates public dashboards for PFAS remediation and unclassified reports on CCP wealth. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — Restricts the collection and sale of location data by intelligence contractors and opposes commercial spyware. Does this give the federal government more power? — Expands federal oversight in housing zoning, intelligence, and AI export licensing. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Establishes formal processes for challenging home appraisals and whistleblower protection for DOE employees. Does this protect the individual right to speak freely? — Strengthens whistleblower protections and supports independent media in partner regions. Does this limit the influence of paid lobbyists? — Strengthens FARA requirements and prohibits covered contract funds from influencing legislation.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Establishes formal processes to combat appraisal bias and blocks forced-labor seafood from commerce. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Prioritizes SMEs via SBIR programs, AI innovation initiatives, and incentives for small-scale developers. Is this likely to create jobs? — Stimulates industrial and high-tech growth through defense procurement, modular housing construction, and professional direct hire authority. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Drives growth through high-tech R&D, industrial base investment, and global nuclear energy competitiveness. Is this likely to slow the rise in prices? — Aims to mitigate housing-driven inflation by aggressively increasing the supply of affordable and modular housing. Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — Protects public shipyard employment and requires consultation with collective-bargaining units during restructuring. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — Implements stricter cost reporting and audit transparency, though offset by high discretionary spending. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — Substantially increases overall government expenditures across defense, intelligence, and housing initiatives. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Authorizes multi-billion dollar expenditures for nuclear modernization, military procurement, and disaster recovery funds.
Raphael Warnock (D-GA)· Oct 9, 2025
S.Amdt. 2952: To require the Secretary of Defense to implement recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States relating to critical military housing supply and affordability.
Adopted
By voice vote, no names recorded
Jon Ossoff (D-GA)· Oct 9, 2025
S.Amdt. 2971: To direct the Office for Victims of Crime of the Department of Justice to continue implementing the anti-trafficking recommendations of the Government Accountability Office and to report to Congress regarding such implementation.
Adopted
By voice vote, no names recorded
Mazie Hirono (D-HI)· Oct 9, 2025
S.Amdt. 2979: To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the numerical limitations on immigrant visas.
Adopted
By voice vote, no names recorded
Mazie Hirono (D-HI)· Oct 9, 2025
S.Amdt. 3015: To require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a feasibility study on the removal of oil from sunken World War II vessels in waters near the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of Palau.
Adopted
By voice vote, no names recorded
Timothy Kaine (D-VA)· Oct 9, 2025
S.Amdt. 3039: To authorize the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to reimburse the Town of Chincoteague, Virginia, for costs directly associated with the removal and replacement of certain drinking water wells.
Adopted
By voice vote, no names recorded
Charles Schumer (D-NY)· Oct 9, 2025
S.Amdt. 3109: To prohibit the use of funds to procure or modify foreign aircraft for presidential airlift.
Failed
4650
Ruben Gallego (D-AZ)· Oct 9, 2025
S.Amdt. 3136: To require a report on the feasibility of implementing artificial intelligence into anti-money laundering investigations relating to activity by foreign terrorist organizations, drug cartels, and other transnational criminal organizations.
Adopted
By voice vote, no names recorded
Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)· Oct 9, 2025
S.Amdt. 3156: To include as an additional right or privilege of commissioned officers of the Public Health Service (and their beneficiaries) certain leave provided under title 10, United States Code, to commissioned officers of the Army (or their beneficiaries).
Adopted
By voice vote, no names recorded
Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)· Oct 9, 2025
S.Amdt. 3210: To limit the provision of support by the Armed Forces to civilian law enforcement activities.
Failed
4652
- 11/12/2025
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 11/10/2025
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- 10/9/2025
- Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S7062-7087)
- Motion by Senator Thune to recommit to Senate Committee on Armed Services with instructions to report back forthwith with the following amendment (SA 3866) withdrawn in Senate.
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate under the order of 10/9/2025, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 77 - 20. Record Vote Number: 570.
- Passed Senate under the order of 10/9/2025, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 77 - 20. Record Vote Number: 570.
- 10/8/2025
- Considered by Senate.
- 10/6/2025
- Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6943-6944)
- 10/1/2025
- Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6889-6893)
- 9/30/2025
- Considered by Senate.
- 9/29/2025
- Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6805-6813)
- 9/19/2025
- Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6781-6784)
- 9/17/2025
- Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6667)
- 9/16/2025
- Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6625)
- 9/11/2025
- Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6561)
- 9/10/2025
- Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6512)
- Motion by Senator Thune to recommit to Senate Committee on Armed Services with instructions to report back forthwith with the following amendment (SA 3866) made in Senate. (text: CR S6512)
- 9/4/2025
- Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (CR S6050)
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 83 - 13. Record Vote Number: 503. (CR S6054)
- Measure laid before Senate by motion.
- 9/3/2025
- Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (CR S5989)
- 9/2/2025
- Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (CR S5539)
- Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 84 - 14. Record Vote Number: 500. (CR S5544)
- 8/2/2025
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S5522)
- Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (CR S5522)
- 7/15/2025
- Committee on Armed Services. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Wicker. With written report No. 119-39.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 115.
- An errata sheet on written report No. 119-39 was printed.
- Introduced in Senate
- 4/9/2025
- Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Cybersecurity. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 119-75, pt. 8.
- Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 119-75, pt. 6.
- 4/8/2025
- Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 119-75, pt. 5.
- 3/5/2025
- Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 119-75, pt. 3.
50 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-HR-2557: IVF for Military Families Act
- 119-HR-3241: Defense Workforce Integration Act of 2025
- 119-HR-3552: Second Chance Reauthorization Act of 2025
- 119-HR-3917: To prohibit the participation of males in athletic programs or activities at the military service academies that are designated for women or girls.
- 119-HR-5623: SEIZE Act of 2025
- 119-HR-5912: DISRUPT Act
- 119-HR-5938: Innovation Fund Act
- 119-HR-5962: To authorize the Department of Justice and the Department of State to provide law enforcement and intelligence technical assistance, training, capacity building, and advisory support to the Government of Ukraine to achieve the exchange of prisoners of war, the release of civilian detainees, and the return of forcibly transferred Ukrainian children, and for other purposes.
- 119-HR-5975: Appraisal Modernization Act
- 119-HR-5990: Whole-Home Repairs Act of 2025
- 119-HR-6009: Defense Biotechnology Strategy Act
- 119-HR-6107: PAID OFF Act of 2025
- 119-HR-6269: Modular Housing Production Act
- 119-HR-6475: Preventing Child Trafficking Act of 2025
- 119-HR-6483: NeighborWorks Accountability Act
- 119-HR-6562: United States Development Finance Corporation Effectiveness Act
- 119-HR-6586: To authorize the Secretary of Defense to establish a pilot program to assess the efficacy of providing junior enlisted members of the Armed Forces a monthly coupon for use in procuring food at commissaries.
- 119-HR-8554: Defense Community Infrastructure Program Revisions Act
- 119-HR-8751: Servicemember Civilian Transition Support Act
- 119-S-911: Chief Herbert D. Proffitt Act of 2025
- 119-S-1204: Gold Star and Surviving Spouse Career Services Act
- 119-S-1231: IVF for Military Families Act
- 119-S-1563: Retired Law Enforcement Officers Continuing Service Act
- 119-S-1632: Defense Workforce Integration Act of 2025
- 119-S-1843: Second Chance Reauthorization Act of 2025
- 119-S-1988: A bill to prohibit the participation of males in athletic programs or activities at the military service academies that are designated for women or girls.
- 119-S-2091: Restoring Lethality Act
- 119-S-2259: Protecting Military Bases from Connected Vehicles of Concern Act of 2025
- 119-S-2453: Partnership for Indo-Pacific Industrial Resilience Authorization Act
- 119-S-2599: A bill to provide for modifications to the State Partnership Program selection analysis.
- 119-S-2600: A bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions.
- 119-S-2601: A bill to improve the planning, programming, and budget coordination for operations of cyber mission force of the Armed Forces, and for other purposes.
- 119-S-2602: A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the scope of affirmation of authority for cyber operations to include defense of critical infrastructure of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.
- 119-S-2603: A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to designate the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy as principal staff assistant to the Secretary of Defense on matters within the responsibility of the Assistant Secretary, and for other purposes.
- 119-S-2604: A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to establish the Artificial General Intelligence Steering Committee, and for other purposes.
- 119-S-2605: A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to improve recruitment and retention of the cyber workforce of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.
- 119-S-2606: A bill to require the Commander of United States Cyber Command to complete development of a roadmap for industry collaboration on artificial intelligence-enabled cyber capabilities for cyberspace operations of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.
- 119-S-2607: A bill to prohibit the availability of funds to modify authorities of the Commander of United States Cyber Command, and for other purposes.
- 119-S-2642: SEIZE Act
- 119-S-2647: International Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2025
- 119-S-2669: A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement a strategy to strengthen multilateral deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region.
- 119-S-3050: PAID OFF Act of 2025
- 119-S-3052: A bill to promote recruiter access to secondary schools.
- 119-S-3053: A bill to require a plan to modernize the nuclear security enterprise.
- 119-S-3067: Innovation Fund Act
- 119-S-3163: A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to seek to engage appropriate officials of Taiwan in a joint program with Taiwan to enable the fielding of uncrewed systems and counter-uncrewed systems capabilities.
- 119-S-3288: A bill to require the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy on intelligence coordination and sharing relating to critical and emerging technologies.
- 119-S-3436: Caring for Veterans and Strengthening National Security Act
- 119-S-3563: A bill to require the Secretary of Defense assess and, as appropriate, implement open technical standards for digital content provenance, and for other purposes.
- 119-S-4474: Servicemember Civilian Transition Support Act