Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)
A bill to prohibit the participation of males in athletic programs or activities at the military service academies that are designated for women or girls.
A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill stops males from taking part in women's or girls' athletic programs or activities at the military service academies. It requires the Secretary of Defense to make sure the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, and the United States Air Force Academy follow this rule. The text defines sex as a person's reproductive biology and genetics at birth. It also allows males to train or practice with women's teams under certain conditions. These conditions apply as long as no female loses a roster spot, practice opportunity, competition chance, scholarship, admission, or other benefit.
Yes
- Scored +6
Would women be better off under this?
The bill provides specific protections to ensure female-designated athletic opportunities are reserved for women.
- Scored +5
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill mandates specific rules that the Secretary of Defense must enforce across all military academies.
- Scored +5
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
The bill aims to protect female-designated opportunities from male competition.
The opposite
- Scored -6
Would men be better off under this?
The bill restricts males from participating in specific designated athletic programs at service academies.
- Scored -5
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
The strict biological definition of sex may impact transgender students' athletic participation.
- Scored -5
Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people?
The bill's biological definition of sex may impact transgender individuals' ability to participate in sports.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 1(b) protects females by ensuring that if males are allowed to train or practice with a women's or girls' team, no female can be deprived of a roster spot, practice or competition opportunity, scholarship, admission, or any other benefit. This helps keep opportunities secure for female athletes.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 1(a) bans any person whose sex is male at birth from participating in athletic programs or activities designated for women or girls at the military service academies. This places a direct restriction on male participation in these specific sports programs.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — The bill provides specific protections to ensure female-designated athletic opportunities are reserved for women. Would men be better off under this? — The bill restricts males from participating in specific designated athletic programs at service academies. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The strict biological definition of sex may impact transgender students' athletic participation.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill mandates specific rules that the Secretary of Defense must enforce across all military academies.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The bill aims to protect female-designated opportunities from male competition. Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The bill's biological definition of sex may impact transgender individuals' ability to participate in sports.
- 6/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
- Introduced in Senate
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana