Markwayne Mullin (R-OK)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The 'Omnibus' Low NOx Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".
A Republican resolution with 13 Republican cosponsors · See all 13 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution aims to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency. The rule involves California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards, specifically titled "The 'Omnibus' Low NOx Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision." If passed, the resolution would render this specific rule without any force or effect.
Yes
- Scored +5
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The resolution seeks to stop a federal rule that impacts California's unique regulatory authority.
- Scored +3
Would business owners be better off under this?
The resolution reduces regulatory compliance burdens for vehicle and engine manufacturers.
The opposite· 3 of 7
- Scored -3
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
The resolution nullifies EPA standards intended to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from vehicles.
- Scored -3
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
By striking the EPA rule, the resolution reduces the strength of motor vehicle pollution standards.
- Scored -2
Does this give the federal government more power?
The resolution limits federal regulatory oversight by nullifying an EPA-mandated rule.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of the EPA Rule: The resolution states that the rule regarding California's motor vehicle and engine pollution standards shall have no force or effect, which would prevent the implementation of the "Omnibus" Low NOx Regulation (S.J. Res. 47).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are mentioned: The provided text does not list any negative consequences or burdens that would result from this resolution.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — By striking the EPA rule, the resolution reduces the strength of motor vehicle pollution standards. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — The resolution nullifies EPA standards intended to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from vehicles.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The resolution seeks to stop a federal rule that impacts California's unique regulatory authority. Does this give the federal government more power? — The resolution limits federal regulatory oversight by nullifying an EPA-mandated rule.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The resolution reduces regulatory compliance burdens for vehicle and engine manufacturers. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Reducing emission standards may negatively impact air quality in densely populated urban areas. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Reducing pollution controls can impact air quality in underserved communities. Would children be better off under this? — Reducing emission standards may negatively impact air quality for children. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Lower air quality standards can disproportionately affect low-income communities.
- 5/5/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/29/2025
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 4/8/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/4/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Deb FischerRepublican · Nebraska
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Cynthia LummisRepublican · Wyoming
James LankfordRepublican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Jerry MoranRepublican · Kansas
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama