A Democratic bill with 19 Democratic cosponsors · See all 20 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The BE HEARD in the Workplace Act aims to prevent and reduce discrimination and harassment in employment through mandatory policies and training. It broadens protections to include independent contractors, interns, fellows, volunteers, and trainees. The legislation updates standards of proof, extends statutes of limitations, and establishes higher base minimum wages and tip retention rights for tipped employees. It also regulates the use of nondisclosure and nondisparagement clauses in settlement agreements to ensure they are knowing and voluntary. Furthermore, the bill creates research initiatives, increases oversight of federal contractors, and authorizes grants to assist low-income workers with legal needs.
Yes· 3 of 16
- Scored +8
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
The bill explicitly clarifies that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under sex discrimination laws.
- Scored +7
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill funds legal assistance and advocacy specifically for low-income workers.
- Scored +7
Would union members be better off under this?
The bill protects the right to pursue collective legal actions and restricts mandatory arbitration.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Mandatory Nondiscrimination Policies: Employers with 15 or more employees must adopt and maintain comprehensive policies regarding prohibited discrimination and harassment, providing clear procedures for reporting and investigations (Sec. 101).
-
Nondiscrimination Training: The bill requires appropriate employers to provide interactive training for employees and specific training for supervisors to help prevent and respond to discrimination and retaliation (Sec. 102).
-
Resource Materials for Small Businesses: The Commission will provide model policies and training materials designed specifically for employers with fewer than 15 employees to assist them in creating better workplaces (Sec. 103).
-
Expanded Definitions of Sex Discrimination: The bill clarifies that sexual orientation, gender identity, sex stereotype, sex characteristics, and pregnancy/childbirth are included under unlawful sex discrimination (Sec. 201).
-
Protection for Tipped Employees: The bill establishes a higher base minimum wage for tipped employees and explicitly grants them the right to retain tips received (Sec. 121).
-
Broader Scope of Protected Individuals: Protections are expanded to include independent contractors, interns, fellows, volunteers, and trainees (Sec. 301).
-
Increased Legal Access: The bill provides for grants to assist low-income workers with civil legal needs related to employment discrimination (Sec. s 421-422) and establishes a system of state advocacy (Sec. 431).
-
Extended Time to File Claims: The bill extends the statutes of limitations for filing discrimination charges, allowing individuals more time to seek legal recourse (Sec. 207).
-
Protection of Settlement Agreements: The bill ensures that nondisparagement or nondisclosure clauses are only valid if they are knowing and voluntary, providing a required period of at least 21 days for consideration and a 7-day period for revocation (Section (C)).
-
Preservation of Rights to Report: Workers are explicitly protected from being prohibited from filing charges or complaints with federal, state, or local agencies, or participating in investigations (Section (vi) and (F)).
-
Safeguarding Against Coercion in Arbitration: The bill aims to prevent employers from forcing workers into arbitration agreements that prohibit them from joining class or collective claims (Section 303(a)(1)).
-
Increased Oversight of Federal Contractors: By requiring disclosures regarding legal judgments and increasing consultation with Labor Compliance Advisors, the bill seeks to ensure federal contractors maintain a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics (Section 304(b)).
-
Support for Discrimination Prevention: The establishment of national grants allows for the education of workers on their rights and provides assistance to those bringing complaints regarding discrimination and harassment (Section s 412(b)).
-
Legal Aid for Vulnerable Workers: The provision of grants for civil legal needs allows low-income workers to receive legal advice, services, or representation regarding employment discrimination (Section 422(a)).
-
Empowerment of State Advocacy: The creation of a state-based system of advocacy provides a way for workers to have their rights protected and investigated at the state level (Section 434).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Fines for Policy Noncompliance: Employers who fail to adopt or maintain required nondiscrimination policies may face fines of up to $1,000 per offense, or at least $5,000 for repeated or willful violations (Sec. 101(d)).
-
Mandatory Training Requirements: Employers may be required to provide in-person or interactive training for all employees and specific training for supervisors (Sec. 102).
-
Employer Liability for Supervisors: Employers are held liable for the acts of individuals authorized to undertake tangible employment actions or direct daily work activities, as well as for negligence leading to a hostile environment (Sec. 206).
-
Restrictions on Nondisclosure and Nondisparagement: Employers are prohibited from using nondisclosure or nondisparagement clauses in contracts to cover prohibited discrimination or retaliation, which may impact how settlement or employment agreements are structured (Sec. 302).
-
Financial Limitations on Damages: While protecting workers, the bill specifies that in actions against the United States or a State, punitive damages are not available (Section (g)(4)(A)).
-
Restrictions on Nondisclosure Terms: The bill limits the ability to use nondisclosure clauses for financial terms to a specified period of time, which may impact how settlements are structured (Section (E)).
-
Compliance Burdens for Contractors: The requirements for disclosures, updates, and consultations with Labor Compliance Advisors create new procedural obligations for entities engaged in federal contracts (Section s 304(b) and (c)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The bill explicitly clarifies that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under sex discrimination laws. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill funds legal assistance and advocacy specifically for low-income workers. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill strengthens the ability of individuals with disabilities to combat employment discrimination. Would union members be better off under this? — The bill protects the right to pursue collective legal actions and restricts mandatory arbitration. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill enhances protections against racial harassment in the workplace. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill includes specific provisions for American Indian consortiums to support advocacy systems. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill extends the statute of limitations for age discrimination claims under the ADEA. Would women be better off under this? — The bill expands protections against discrimination and harassment in the workplace. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill provides enhanced legal and advocacy resources for workers facing discrimination. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill increases the base wage for tipped employees which benefits many service workers.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — The bill extends protections and legal support for individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill expands protections against employment discrimination and provides resources for legal assistance. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill provides grants for legal assistance to low-income workers facing employment discrimination.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — The bill strengthens worker protections by prohibiting mandatory arbitration of work disputes and protecting concerted legal action. Does this raise the lowest wage an employer may pay? — The bill increases the base minimum wage for tipped employees through a scheduled annual increase.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires federal contractors to disclose information regarding labor and civil rights violations.
- 3/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/12/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 18 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
5 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts