A Democratic bill with 22 Democratic cosponsors · See all 22 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The BE HEARD in the Workplace Act aims to prevent and reduce discrimination and harassment in employment through research, training, and legal updates. It mandates that employers with 15 or more employees adopt comprehensive nondiscrimination policies and provides resources for small businesses. The bill clarifies that sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination are unlawful forms of sex discrimination while expanding protections to include independent contractors, interns, fellows, volunteers, and trainees. It also implements strict requirements for the validity of nondisparagement, nondisclosure, and arbitration agreements to ensure workers can report issues. Additionally, the Act establishes a framework to prohibit mandatory predispute arbitration and includes provisions for wage adjustments for tipped employees. Finally, the legislation provides for nationwide grants and state-based advocacy to address workplace discrimination.
Yes· 3 of 23
- Scored +8
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
The bill explicitly protects sexual orientation and gender identity in the workplace.
- Scored +8
Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people?
The bill explicitly clarifies that sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination are unlawful forms of sex discrimination.
- Scored +7
Would women be better off under this?
The bill provides enhanced protections for pregnancy, childbirth, and sex-based discrimination.
The opposite
- Scored -4
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill imposes stricter compliance requirements and reduces the enforceability of certain arbitration and non-disclosure agreements.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Mandatory Nondiscrimination Policies: Employers with 15 or more employees must adopt and maintain comprehensive policies that define prohibited discrimination and describe reporting methods, which provides employees with clear procedures for addressing issues (Section 101).
-
Nondiscrimination Training: The bill allows for required training for all employees and specific training for supervisors to help prevent and respond to harassment (Section 102).
-
Clarification of Sex Discrimination: The Act clarifies that sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination are considered unlawful sex discrimination, providing clearer protections for these groups (Section 201).
-
Expanded Protections for Various Workers: Protections are extended to include independent contractors, interns, fellows, volunteers, and trainees (Section 301).
-
Improved Access to Legal Resources: The bill includes provisions for grants to assist low-income workers with civil legal needs related to employment discrimination (Section 422) and to help educate workers on their rights and assist in bringing complaints (Section 412(b)).
-
Wage Adjustments for Tipped Employees: The Act establishes a schedule for increasing the cash wage for tipped employees toward the standard minimum wage (Section 121).
-
Increased Statute of Limitations: The bill extends the time periods during which individuals can file charges or complaints regarding discrimination (Section 207).
-
Protections for Workers' Rights to Report: The bill ensures that nondisclosure or nondisparagement clauses cannot stop a worker from filing a charge with the Commission or other agencies, or from testifying in legal proceedings (Section 2(A)(vi)).
-
Ensuring Meaningful Consent: To make agreements "knowing and voluntary," the bill requires that workers be advised in writing to consult an attorney, be given at least 21 days to consider a proposal, and have a 7-day period to revoke their agreement (Section 2(C)(iv-vi)).
-
Limiting Financial Burdens of Breach: The bill stipulates that a worker cannot be required to pay damages for breaching a clause that exceeds the actual value provided to them in the agreement (Section 2(G)).
-
Restoring Rights to Legal Forums: By prohibiting many predispute arbitration agreements, the bill allows workers to pursue work disputes in appropriate legal forums rather than being forced into arbitration (Section 302(a)(1)).
-
Increased Transparency for Federal Contractors: Federal contractors are required to disclose whether they have had recent legal judgments or administrative determinations against them regarding labor or civil rights violations (Section 304(b)(1)(A)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Fines for Non-compliance: Employers who fail to adopt required nondiscrimination policies may face fines of up to $1,000 per offense, or at least $5,000 for repeated or willful violations (Section 101).
-
Workplace Survey Requirements: While the bill provides resources for employment climate assessments, it specifies that employers may not compel employees to participate in these surveys (Section 106).
-
Limitations on Nondisclosure of Financial Terms: While financial terms can be kept private for a limited time, they are no longer subject to permanent or indefinite nondisclosure through certain clauses (Section 2(E)).
-
Restrictions on Employer Autonomy in Agreements: Employers are prohibited from unilaterally including clauses that solely benefit the establishment in a separation or settlement agreement (Section 2(B)).
-
Compliance Burdens for Federal Contractors: Contractors and subcontractors must provide regular updates regarding their legal and labor compliance history, which includes a requirement to report information every 6 months (Section 304(b)(1) and (c)(1)).
-
Administrative Requirements for State Systems: States must establish and maintain a specific "lead entity" and a system of advocacy that meets various federal requirements to receive allotments (Section 434).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The bill explicitly protects sexual orientation and gender identity in the workplace. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill broadens protections and provides resources for individuals facing discrimination based on disability. Would women be better off under this? — The bill provides enhanced protections for pregnancy, childbirth, and sex-based discrimination. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill includes grants to assist low-income workers with civil legal needs related to employment discrimination. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill strengthens anti-harassment protections which benefit racial minorities in the workplace. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The bill strengthens anti-harassment protections which benefit racial minorities in the workplace. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill strengthens anti-harassment protections which benefit racial minorities in the workplace. Would immigrants be better off under this? — The bill explicitly protects workers regardless of citizenship status or authorization to work. Would union members be better off under this? — The bill enhances rights related to collective action and restricts mandatory arbitration. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill provides stronger protections against age-based workplace harassment. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill provides specific funding and support for American Indian consortiums. Would students be better off under this? — The bill extends protections to interns and trainees. Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill imposes stricter compliance requirements and reduces the enforceability of certain arbitration and non-disclosure agreements.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The bill explicitly clarifies that sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination are unlawful forms of sex discrimination. Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — The bill expands protections and provides resources for individuals facing discrimination based on disability. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The bill enhances protections for pregnant workers and clarifies sex-based discrimination definitions. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill strengthens protections against workplace harassment based on race through increased employer liability and research. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill provides legal assistance specifically targeted at low-income workers facing discrimination.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The bill expands legal avenues and protections for workers to challenge discriminatory practices. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires federal contractors to disclose legal judgments regarding labor or civil rights violations. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands the federal government's role in regulating workplace discrimination and providing oversight through the EEOC.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — The bill strengthens worker rights by prohibiting certain mandatory arbitration agreements and protecting concerted legal actions. Does this raise the lowest wage an employer may pay? — The bill increases the cash wage for tipped employees through a scheduled phase-in towards the standard minimum wage. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill provides resource materials and model policies to assist small businesses in complying with nondiscrimination requirements.
- 6/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/20/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/13/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 15 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Marilyn StricklandDemocrat · Washington
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida