David McCormick (R-PA)
American Battlefield Protection Program Amendments Act of 2025
A Republican bill with 10 Democratic cosponsors · See all 22 cosponsors
Last activity — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 704.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the ``American Battlefield Protection Program Amendments Act of the 2025'', aims to amend title 54 of the United States Code. It modifies cost-sharing requirements for specific grant programs under the American Battlefield Protection Program. Additionally, the legislation directs the Secretary of the Interior to prepare studies of sites and structures tied to the French and Indian War and the Mexican-American War. These studies will assess the significance and threats to such sites and provide preservation alternatives. The bill also updates appropriation authorizations for specific grant programs through fiscal year 2035.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +4
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
The bill enhances the preservation and study of historic battlefield sites.
- Scored +3
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill aids in the preservation and study of historical sites which can help in land management.
- Scored +3
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill requires consultation with affected Indian Tribes regarding historic site studies.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Extended Battlefield Acquisition Support: The reauthorization of the Battlefield Acquisition Grant Program through 2035 provides continued support for acquiring battlefields (Section 2(a)).
-
Increased Grant Capacity for Interpretation and Restoration: By increasing the limit from 50 to 75 in both the Battlefield Interpretation Modernization Grant Program and the Battlefield Restoration Grant Program, more resources may be available for these specific programs (Section 2(b) and Section 2(c)).
-
Historical Preservation Research: The mandate for the Secretary of the Interior to prepare studies on French and Indian War and Mexican-American War sites can help identify, assess threats to, and provide preservation alternatives for historically significant locations (Section 3(a) and Section 3(b)).
-
Collaborative Preservation Efforts: The requirement for the Secretary to consult with State Governors, Indian Tribes, local governments, and historic preservation organizations ensures that various stakeholders have a voice in the study of historic sites (Section 3(d)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The bill enhances the preservation and study of historic battlefield sites. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill aids in the preservation and study of historical sites which can help in land management.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill requires consultation with affected Indian Tribes regarding historic site studies.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The bill funds studies to identify and assess the significance of historic war sites.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands federal authority over battlefield preservation and historical studies.
- 11/12/2026
- Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Reported by Senator Lee with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 704.
- 9/30/2026
- Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2026
- Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Bill CassidyRepublican · Louisiana
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Cindy Hyde-SmithRepublican · Mississippi
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Tim SheehyRepublican · Montana
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Roger WickerRepublican · Mississippi
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia