Edward Markey (D-MA)
International Human Rights Defense Act of 2025
A Democratic bill with 35 Democratic cosponsors · See all 36 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "International Human Rights Defense Act of 2025," seeks to establish a permanent Special Envoy for the Human Rights of LGBTQI+ People within the Department of State. This Special Envoy would hold the rank of Ambassador and serve as the principal advisor to the Secretary of State on international human rights issues affecting these communities. The legislation directs the development of a global strategy to prevent and respond to criminalization, discrimination, and violence. It also aims to integrate these protections into broader United States foreign policy and coordination efforts. Additionally, the bill mandates updates to annual human rights reports to include specific data on these issues.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +10
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
The act creates a dedicated high-level diplomatic role to combat discrimination, violence, and criminalization of LGBTQI+ people.
- Scored +10
Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people?
The bill establishes a permanent Special Envoy to protect and advance the human rights of LGBTQI+ people globally.
- Scored +6
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The bill specifically addresses the protection and resettlement needs of LGBTQI+ asylum seekers.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Protection and Advocacy: The establishment of a permanent Special Envoy will direct United States Government resources toward the protection, integration, and empowerment of LGBTQI+ people (Section 4(c)(2)(C)).
-
Support for Asylum Seekers: The policy seeks to ensure that individuals with a well-founded fear of persecution due to being LGBTQI+ have the opportunity to seek protection in the United States (Section 3(13)).
-
Improved Global Health Outcomes: The bill aims to support at-risk communities in combating HIV/AIDS by creating enabling legal environments (Section 3(11)) and enhancing health sector capacity (Section 6(3)(B)).
-
Enhanced Training for Officials: The policy includes enhancing training for foreign military, police, and judicial officials to prevent and respond to discrimination and violence (Section 3(7)).
-
Support for Local Organizations: The act intends to build local capacity by supporting governments and nongovernmental organizations worldwide (Section 3(3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The act creates a dedicated high-level diplomatic role to combat discrimination, violence, and criminalization of LGBTQI+ people. Would immigrants be better off under this? — The bill specifically addresses the protection and resettlement needs of LGBTQI+ asylum seekers.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The bill establishes a permanent Special Envoy to protect and advance the human rights of LGBTQI+ people globally. Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — The bill seeks to ensure that LGBTQI+ individuals facing persecution have the opportunity to seek protection in the United States.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill aims to combat HIV/AIDS and reduce health care stigma facing LGBTQI+ communities.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The bill increases diplomatic engagement and bilateral coordination regarding LGBTQI+ human rights.
- 11/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/10/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
- 33 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Jon OssoffDemocrat · Georgia
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts