Rules Committee · Dec 10, 2025
H.Amdt. 116: Its purpose is not yet published.
Adopted
With no one objecting, no names recorded
John Cornyn (R-TX)
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
S. 1071 · Senate bill Armed Forces and National Security
A Republican bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Became Public Law No: 119-60.
Became law
Passed both chambers and was signed by the President, or became law without a signature.
Nothing more in Congress: it is law. When it takes effect depends on the dates written into it — some parts start at once, others a year or more later.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed Senate unanimous consent
- Passed House 312–112
- To President
- Became Law
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This Act authorizes appropriations for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of Defense, military construction, and Department of Energy defense activities. It establishes military personnel end strengths for active and reserve forces and outlines general provisions and authorities for the Armed Forces. The legislation includes intelligence authorizations for fiscal year 2026 and provides the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025. Additionally, the Act addresses various foreign affairs matters, financial services policies, and judiciary matters.
Yes· 3 of 78
- Scored +9
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?
Strongly emphasizes multilateral coordination with NATO, AUKUS, and Indo-Pacific partners.
- Scored +9
Does this put more money into medical research?
Authorizes massive R&D spending in AI, biotechnology, nuclear physics, and infectious diseases.
- Scored +9
Does this put more money into scientific research?
Authorizes massive R&D spending in AI, biotechnology, nuclear physics, and hypersonics.
The opposite· 3 of 12
- Scored -10
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?
Massively increases spending across all military branches, nuclear modernization, and intelligence procurement.
- Scored -8
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
Substantially increases spending for defense platforms, intelligence, infrastructure, and international development.
- Scored -6
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
Prohibits employee resource groups based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
What Congress actually voted on
5 recorded votes have been taken on this bill. 2 of them decided something; the rest moved it along.
- The House: the vote on whether to pass the bill This is the real decision in this chamber. Passing here sends the bill to the other chamber, which must pass it too before it can go to the President. Passed 312 yes · 112 no
12/10/2025 · Roll call 320 · recorded as “On Passage”
- The Senate: a vote to accept the other chamber's changes The House and Senate passed different versions. This votes on accepting the other chamber's wording, which is the last step before the bill goes to the President. Passed 77 yes · 20 no
12/17/2025 · Roll call 648 · recorded as “On the Motion (Motion to Concur in the House Amendment to S. 1071)”
- The House: a vote to send the measure to a committee instead of deciding it now Usually an attempt by the side that expects to lose to change the measure or delay it. If it fails, the measure stays on the floor and the chamber goes on to decide it. Motion to commit rejected 209 yes · 216 no
12/10/2025 · Roll call 319 · recorded as “On Motion to Commit”
- The Senate: a vote on whether to start debating something This decides only whether the chamber takes the measure up at all. Nothing about the measure itself has been decided when it passes. Motion to Proceed Agreed to 75 yes · 22 no
12/11/2025 · Roll call 646 · recorded as “On the Motion to Proceed S. 1071”
- The Senate: a vote to end debate and allow a final vote In the Senate, debate can continue indefinitely unless 60 senators vote to end it. This vote is that attempt. It decides whether the Senate may vote on the thing at all — not whether the thing passes. A failed cloture vote usually ends the matter without anyone ever voting on its merits. Cloture Motion Agreed to 76 yes · 20 no
12/15/2025 · Roll call 647 · recorded as “On the Cloture Motion S. 1071”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 317 - Requires the Secretary of Defense to offer alternative drinking water to households downgradient from military installations whose private drinking water wells are contaminated with perfluorooctanesulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid substances from Department activities, helping protect public health and secure safe drinking water.
-
Section 521 - Codifies and expands the Individual Longitudinal Exposure Record to compile and provide available occupational and environmental exposure information to support the health care and compensation needs of members of the Armed Forces and veterans.
-
Section 571 - Improves the Transition Assistance Program by encouraging in-person pre-separation counseling and requiring the Department of Veterans Affairs to maintain a website allowing veterans and their dependents to search for support programs by ZIP code.
-
Section 584 - Authorizes dual or concurrent enrollment programs for students of Defense Dependent Schools to access post-secondary course credit, providing educational advancement opportunities for military families.
-
Section 734 - Establishes a pilot program to assist certain members of the Armed Forces and dependents with additional supplemental coverage relating to the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Section 901 - Prohibits diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs within the Department of Defense, requiring the removal of offices, chief officers, training courses, and data dashboards related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility, which may remove support systems for diverse servicemembers and civilian personnel.
-
Section 559A - Prohibits males from participating in athletic programs or activities at military service academies that are designated for women or girls, which limits athletic participation options based on biological sex at birth.
-
Section 842 - Prohibits the acquisition of advanced batteries and cells whose functional cell components and technology are sourced, refined, or produced from a foreign entity of concern, which may restrict supply chains and increase costs for certain technologies.
-
Section 851 - Prohibits executive agencies from procuring biotechnology equipment or services produced or provided by specific biotechnology companies of concern, potentially increasing procurement costs or limiting available medical and technological supply options.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Provides significant grants, subsidies, and streamlined procurement for defense and tech contractors. Would children be better off under this? — Reauthorizes the PROTECT Our Children Act and improves childcare assistance and special education staffing. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Significantly improves healthcare access, transition assistance, and disability benefit records. Would women be better off under this? — Specifically targets the prevention of sexual assault and supports women-led startups. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Provides full federal recognition and services to the Lumbee Tribe and increases BIA procurement assistance. Would students be better off under this? — Provides numerous scholarships, fellowships, and compensated internships in science and diplomacy. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Provides support for children with disabilities and implements a uniform medical waiver process for enlistment. Would retired people be better off under this? — Improves medical care availability and expands death benefits for retired public safety officers. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Creates STEM jobs, fellowships, and funded internship programs, though balanced by Selective Service registration. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Improves healthcare access for retired veterans and funds the Armed Forces Retirement Home. Would farmers be better off under this? — Promotes the use of next-generation agricultural feedstocks for bioindustrial manufacturing. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Provides funding for PFAS-contaminated water replacement and protects against usurious microlending. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Improves parental leave and housing allowance calculations for service members. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Addresses PFAS contamination in private wells and provides economic stimulus via national laboratories. Would union members be better off under this? — Supports high-value manufacturing jobs in shipyards and aircraft factories. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Improves military pay allowances and education benefits for dependents. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Increases funding for HBCUs and provides targeted fellowships like the Rangel program. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Balances the elimination of DEI programs with the registry to reunite divided Korean American families. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Establishes a pilot program for sound insulation repair and replacement at large hub airports. Would white Americans be better off under this? — Removes DEI requirements which some perceive as restrictive. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Major aerospace corporations benefit from contracts, while facing restrictions on outbound investments. Would gun owners be better off under this? — Authorizes the transfer and sale of surplus shotguns to specific corporations. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Prohibits employee resource groups based on sexual orientation or gender identity. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Creates legal and financial risks for investors engaging in covered national security transactions. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Restricts capital flow into prohibited technologies in countries of concern. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Limits investment opportunities in countries of concern. Would immigrants be better off under this? — Increases funding for border security and alien removal operations, though extends some maritime privileges. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Elimination of DEI programs and increased border enforcement reporting may negatively impact this group. Would men be better off under this? — Imposes automatic Selective Service registration and restricts athletic participation in women's programs.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — Strongly emphasizes multilateral coordination with NATO, AUKUS, and Indo-Pacific partners. Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — Mandates AI security, enhances 5G network security, and provides cyber resilience support for the Western Balkans. Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad? — Restructures the State Department, adds specialized ambassadors, and promotes partnerships with Balkan universities. Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — Improves transition assistance, facility access, and utilizes exposure records for disability benefits. Does this put more money into stopping terrorism? — Extends authorities for joint task forces and funds global fissile material security and Counter-ISIL programs. Does this send more money or help to other countries? — Significantly expands military and financial aid for Ukraine, Israel, the Philippines, and the Western Balkans. Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country? — Grants authority to intercept unmanned aircraft and expands ISR capabilities and terrorist watchlists. Does this make trade with other countries easier? — Promotes reciprocal defense procurement and secure supply chains, despite restrictions on trade with China and Russia. Does this reduce what is spent on the military? — Massively increases spending across all military branches, nuclear modernization, and intelligence procurement.
- Healthcare
- Does this put more money into medical research? — Authorizes massive R&D spending in AI, biotechnology, nuclear physics, and infectious diseases. Does this make mental health care easier to get? — Significantly expands behavioral health specialists, telemedicine, and counseling for deployment cycles and Cyber Mission Force. Does this help veterans get medical care? — Greatly improves access through DOD-VA resource sharing, medical record retention, and facility funding. Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — Mandates naloxone availability at clinics and implements the BUST Fentanyl Act to disrupt trafficking. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Expands specialty care travel reimbursements, medical monitoring for hazardous exposure, and benefits for the Lumbee Tribe. Does this make the country readier for the next outbreak? — Invests in bioindustrial manufacturing, biodefense capacity, and reviews of COVID-19 origins.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — Authorizes massive R&D spending in AI, biotechnology, nuclear physics, and hypersonics. Does this put more into space exploration? — Authorizes substantial procurement for the Space Force and expands space launch capacity. Does this make college cost less? — Establishes tuition assistance pilots and financial assistance for dual enrollment programs. Does this give people more control over their personal data? — Protects multiomic and biological data from foreign adversaries and mandates encrypted mobile devices for personnel. Does this get reliable internet to more people? — Supports global internet freedom and development of telecommunications networks in the Western Balkans. Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — Prohibits AI developed by covered entities like DeepSeek and restricts outbound investment in prohibited technologies. Does this put more money into public schools? — Provides $60 million in impact aid to local educational agencies benefiting military dependents. Does this make patent and copyright rules fairer? — Addresses the theft of AI and biotech intellectual property by nation-state adversaries.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Creates a mechanism to designate state sponsors of unlawful detention and establishes whistleblower protections for DOE employees. Does this make elections run better? — Requires penetration testing for voting systems and promotes democratic resilience in the Western Balkans. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Mandates public reporting on COVID-19 origins, PFAS dashboards, and DFC project-level information. Does this give the federal government more power? — Expands federal authority in intelligence, national security, and outbound investment prohibitions. Does this protect the individual right to speak freely? — Includes reports on whistleblower protections and the right of members to speak with Congress. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Requires consultation with governors on nuclear waste and establishes concurrent jurisdiction with Connecticut. Does this limit the influence of paid lobbyists? — Prohibits the use of covered contract funds to influence legislative action. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — Balances protections for biological data against expanded intelligence and surveillance authorities.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster? — Creates a Military-Civilian Medical Surge Program and mandates tsunami preparedness plans for Coast Guard properties. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Accelerates PFAS remediation, mandates cleanup of defense nuclear facilities, and strengthens oil spill response. Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — Prioritizes regional infrastructure including roads and railways in the Western Balkans and funds defense access roads. Does this invest in rural communities? — Supports rural areas hosting national laboratories and distributes bioindustrial facilities geographically. Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power? — Funds microgrids, photovoltaic arrays, battery storage, and bio-based fuels. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — Invests in bio-based fuels, advanced nuclear energy, and clean energy transitions in the Western Balkans. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — Develops plans to release defense nuclear sites for local reuse and takes land into trust for the Lumbee Tribe. Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport? — Provides authority to connect contractor employees to mass transit facilities. Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced? — Cautiously encourages biofuels and reduces dependence on Russian energy, while maintaining naval petroleum reserves.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this tighten control of the border? — Authorizes significant resources for southern land border security and maritime surveillance. Does this make child care cost less? — Funds construction of Child Development Centers and creates financial assistance for in-home childcare in high-cost areas. Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — Provides direct impact aid for children with severe disabilities and includes disability as a protected category for seafarers. Does this make housing cost less? — Allocates funding for military family housing maintenance and initiates studies to align BAH with actual costs. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Aims to reduce poverty in less developed countries and the Western Balkans via DFC strategic investments. Does this protect the freedom to practise a religion? — Increases flexibility for military chaplains and establishes a Chaplain Corps in the CIA for all faiths and non-faiths. Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life? — Supports independent media in the Western Balkans but prohibits funds for entertainment complying with Chinese censorship. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — Balances the prohibition of DEI offices with comprehensive reforms to combat sexual assault and maternity uniform allowances. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Balances the elimination of DEI programs with increased funding for HBCUs and federal recognition of the Lumbee Tribe. Is this likely to reduce homelessness? — Includes housing advocacy in deployment support and improves military housing affordability. Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — Provides temporary nonimmigrant authority for specific construction workers on Wake Island. Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — Prohibits DoD from maintaining offices or employee resource groups relating to sexual orientation or gender identity. Does this put more limits on buying or owning guns? — Focuses heavily on the procurement of ammunition and advanced weaponry.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Establishes Project Spectrum and BOOST programs to remove procedural barriers for small and nontraditional defense contractors. Is this likely to create jobs? — Stimulates massive employment in aerospace, shipbuilding, textiles, and high-tech manufacturing through industrial base expansion. Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Requires truth-in-lending policies and safeguards against abusive lending by intermediaries via the DFC. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Drives growth through investments in AI, biotechnology, advanced manufacturing, and international equity investments. Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — Utilizes unionized industrial labor and requires consultation with collective-bargaining units during restructuring. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — Implements stricter audit requirements, life-cycle cost estimates, and rigorous reporting for major acquisitions. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — Substantially increases spending for defense platforms, intelligence, infrastructure, and international development. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Significant authorizations for military procurement, nuclear modernization, and foreign aid generally increase federal deficits.
- Public Law (12/19/2025)
The text as it became law
- Enrolled Bill
The final version, on its way to the President
The changes one chamber made to the other chamber’s version, as it passed them
John Thune (R-SD)· Dec 17, 2025
S.Amdt. 3961: To improve the bill.
Withdrawn
Proposed amendment SA 3961 withdrawn when motion by Senator Thune to concur in the House amendment to S. 1071 withdrawn in Senate.
John Thune (R-SD)· Dec 17, 2025
S.Amdt. 3962: To improve the bill.
Withdrawn
SA 3962 fell when SA 3961 withdrawn.
John Thune (R-SD)· Dec 15, 2025
S.Amdt. 3963: To improve the bill.
Withdrawn
SA 3963 (the instructions of the motion to refer) fell when cloture invoked on the motion to concur in the House amendment to S. 1071 agreed to.
John Thune (R-SD)· Dec 15, 2025
S.Amdt. 3964: To improve the bill.
Withdrawn
SA 3964 fell when SA 3963 (the instructions of the motion to refer) fell.
John Thune (R-SD)· Dec 15, 2025
S.Amdt. 3965: To improve the bill.
Withdrawn
SA 3965 fell when SA 3964 fell.
- 12/18/2025
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Presented to President.
- Signed by President.
- Became Public Law No: 119-60.
- 12/17/2025
- Considered by Senate (Message from the House considered).
- Motion by Senator Thune to concur in the House amendment to S. 1071 with an amendment (SA 3961) withdrawn in Senate.
- Resolving differences -- Senate actions: Senate agreed to the House amendment to S. 1071 by Yea-Nay Vote. 77 - 20. Record Vote Number: 648.
- Senate agreed to the House amendment to S. 1071 by Yea-Nay Vote. 77 - 20. Record Vote Number: 648.
- 12/16/2025
- Considered by Senate (Message from the House considered). (consideration: CR S8749)
- 12/15/2025
- Cloture on the motion to concur in the House amendment to S. 1071 invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 76 - 20. Record Vote Number: 647. (CR S8707)
- Motion by Senator Thune to refer to Senate Committee on Armed Services the House message to accompany S. 1071 with instructions to report back forthwith with the following amendment (SA 3963) fell when cloture was invoked on the motion to concur in the House amendment to S. 1071 in Senate.
- Considered by Senate (Message from the House considered). (consideration: CR S8707-8708)
- 12/11/2025
- Motion to proceed to consideration of the House message to accompany S. 1071 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 75 - 22. Record Vote Number: 646. (CR S8655)
- Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S8655-8656)
- Motion by Senator Thune to concur in the House amendment to S. 1071 made in Senate. (CR S8655)
- Cloture motion on the motion to concur in the House amendment to S. 1071 presented in Senate. (CR S8655-8656)
- Motion by Senator Thune to concur in the House amendment to S. 1071 with an amendment (SA 3961) made in Senate. (CR S8656)
- Motion by Senator Thune to refer to Senate Committee on Armed Services the House message to accompany S. 1071 with instructions to report back forthwith with the following amendment (SA 3963) made in Senate. (CR S8656)
- 12/10/2025
- Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House amendment to Senate bill.
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 312 - 112 (Roll no. 320). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H5136-5510)
- On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 312 - 112 (Roll no. 320). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H5136-5510)
- On motion to commit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 216 (Roll no. 319).
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5519-5520)
- POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on S. 1071, the Chair put the question on motion to commit and by voice vote announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Norcross demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- The previous question on the motion to commit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
- Mr. Norcross moved to commit to the Committee on Armed Services. (text: CR H5518)
- The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on S. 1071.
- Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071.
- Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 936. (consideration: CR H5136-5518)
- Rule H. Res. 936 passed House.
- 12/9/2025
- Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 936 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071.
- 8/8/2025
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 8/1/2025
- Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs discharged by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5475; text: CR S5475)
- 3/14/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
77 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-HR-531: South Pacific Tuna Treaty Act of 2025
- 119-HR-910: Taiwan Non-Discrimination Act of 2025
- 119-HR-1269: Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act of 2025
- 119-HR-1274: PROTECT Our Children Reauthorization Act of 2025
- 119-HR-1701: Strategic Ports Reporting Act
- 119-HR-1898: Military Helicopter Training Safety Act of 2025
- 119-HR-2351: To direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to update the policy of the Coast Guard regarding the use of medication to treat drug overdose, and for other purposes.
- 119-HR-2959: Hudson River Protection Act
- 119-HR-3331: Mariner Exam Modernization Act
- 119-HR-3838: Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
- 119-HR-3917: To prohibit the participation of males in athletic programs or activities at the military service academies that are designated for women or girls.
- 119-HR-4275: Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025
- 119-HR-4375: Great Lakes Icebreaker Act of 2025
- 119-HR-4383: Sound Insulation Treatment Repair and Replacement Program Act
- 119-HR-5131: Public Lands Military Readiness Act of 2025
- 119-HR-5167: Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
- 119-HR-5186: To authorize the Secretary of Defense to carry out a program to support the defense biotechnology supply chain, and for other purposes.
- 119-HR-5190: To expand the contested logistics demonstration and prototyping program to include commercial additive manufacturing facilities in contested logistics environments, and for other purposes.
- 119-HR-5400: To amend title 10, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to annually review the amount of financial assistance for child care and youth program services providers provided by the Secretary.
- 119-HR-5466: GUARD Act
- 119-HR-5864: Improving Police CARE Act
- 119-HR-5962: To authorize the Department of Justice and the Department of State to provide law enforcement and intelligence technical assistance, training, capacity building, and advisory support to the Government of Ukraine to achieve the exchange of prisoners of war, the release of civilian detainees, and the return of forcibly transferred Ukrainian children, and for other purposes.
- 119-HR-5987: Total Force Family Education Act
- 119-HR-6009: Defense Biotechnology Strategy Act
- 119-HR-6410: Atlantic Coast Shipping Safety Act
- 119-HR-6456: To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas, and for other purposes.
- 119-HR-6510: National Military Civilian Medical Surge Program Act of 2025
- 119-HR-6514: Protecting Animals in Military Training Act
- 119-HR-6557: The Center for Strategic Deterrence and Weapons of Mass Destruction Studies Act of 2025
- 119-HR-6562: United States Development Finance Corporation Effectiveness Act
- 119-HR-6563: Terrorist Watchlist Modification Review Act
- 119-HR-6584: Cyber Talent Development and Recruitment Act
- 119-HR-6595: To direct the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to improve the availability of care for veterans at facilities of the Department of Defense.
- 119-HR-6611: The F–47 Program Total Force Act of 2025
- 119-HR-6612: Defense Civilian Faculty Copyright Act of 2025
- 119-HR-6627: Improving the Enlisted to Officer Judge Advocate Program Act
- 119-HR-6628: Protect Greenbury Point Conservation Area Act
- 119-HR-6629: Developing Master Plans for Military Service Academies Act of 2025
- 119-HR-6630: Expanding Mental Health Access for Cyber Command Personnel Act
- 119-HR-6631: Establishing Cyber Security Educational Programs at Academic Institutions Act
- 119-HR-6664: To establish a Biotechnology Management Office in the Department of Defense and to provide support for the research and development of bioindustrial manufacturing processes, and for other purposes.
- 119-HR-6759: To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a pilot program for emerging technologies for moisture control and mitigation in covered housing, to standardize certain mold remediation guidelines, and for other purposes.
- 119-HR-6793: Public Shipyard Workforce Protection Act of 2025
- 119-HR-6910: United States International Development Corporation Chief Development Officer Act
- 119-HR-7448: Modernizing and Improving the National Terrorism Advisory System Act of 2026
- 119-S-237: Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act of 2025
- 119-S-524: Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025
- 119-S-539: PROTECT Our Children Reauthorization Act of 2025
- 119-S-777: Strategic Ports Reporting Act
- 119-S-860: BUST FENTANYL Act
- 119-S-911: Chief Herbert D. Proffitt Act of 2025
- 119-S-1595: Improving Police CARE Act
- 119-S-1780: Mexico Security Assistance Accountability Act
- 119-S-1900: Taiwan Non-Discrimination Act of 2025
- 119-S-1988: A bill to prohibit the participation of males in athletic programs or activities at the military service academies that are designated for women or girls.
- 119-S-2133: A bill to repeal the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019.
- 119-S-2307: Sound Insulation Treatment Repair and Replacement Program Act
- 119-S-2318: Streamlining American Manufacturing Strategy Act
- 119-S-2453: Partnership for Indo-Pacific Industrial Resilience Authorization Act
- 119-S-2644: Camden National Battlefield Park Study Act
- 119-S-3163: A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to seek to engage appropriate officials of Taiwan in a joint program with Taiwan to enable the fielding of uncrewed systems and counter-uncrewed systems capabilities.
- 119-S-3288: A bill to require the Director of National Intelligence to develop a strategy on intelligence coordination and sharing relating to critical and emerging technologies.
- 119-S-3291: Enhanced COVID-19 Transparency Act of 2025
- 119-S-3388: SERVE Act
- 119-S-3445: A bill to require the provision of alternative drinking water to households whose private drinking water is contaminated with perfluorooctanesulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid substances from activities of the Department of Defense.
- 119-S-3446: A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to submit a strategy to accelerate the response efforts of the Department of Defense with respect to releases of perfluoroalkyl substances or polyfluoroalkyl substances from the activities of the Department.
- 119-S-3450: Emergency Response Authority Act
- 119-S-3454: GUARD Act of 2025
- 119-S-3463: Protect Greenbury Point Conservation Area Act of 2025
- 119-S-3469: BIOSECURE Act of 2025
- 119-S-3481: SAFER SKIES Act
- 119-S-3541: A bill to increase competition in Defense contracting, and for other purposes.
- 119-S-3555: Comprehensive Outbound Investment National Security Act of 2025
- 119-S-3558: National Guard Protective Zone Act
- 119-HCONRES-66: Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make a correction in the enrollment of the bill S. 1071.
- 119-HRES-936: Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3898) to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to make targeted reforms with respect to waters of the United States and other matters, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3383) to amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 with respect to the authority of closed-end companies to invest in private funds; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3638) to direct the Secretary of Energy to prepare periodic assessments and submit reports on the supply chain for the generation and transmission of electricity, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3628) to amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to add a standard related to State consideration of reliable generation, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3668) to promote interagency coordination for reviewing certain authorizations under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1071) to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of Fernando V. Cota from Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery, Texas, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
- 119-SRES-110: A resolution condemning Russia's illegal abduction of Ukrainian children.
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas