Mike Rogers (R-AL)
Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make a correction in the enrollment of the bill S. 1071.
A Republican resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed both chambers, not yet sent to the President
Both the House and the Senate have passed it, though not necessarily the same text.
If the two chambers passed identical wording, the final copy is being prepared for the President. If they did not, one chamber must accept the other's version or the two negotiate a single one — nothing goes to the President until the text is identical.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Agreed to by the House unanimous consent
- Agreed to by the Senate unanimous consent
A concurrent resolution is how the House and the Senate settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.
No one's position on it was recorded: the House by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote), and the Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote).
What this bill would do
This concurrent resolution directs the Secretary of the Senate to make a specific correction to the enrollment of bill S. 1071. The purpose of the correction is to amend the long title of the bill. The updated title aims to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2026 regarding Department of Defense military activities. It also covers military construction and defense activities for the Department of Energy. Additionally, the bill prescribes military personnel strengths for that fiscal year.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +1
Would business owners be better off under this?
Defense construction authorizations provide opportunities for businesses within the government contracting sector.
- Scored +1
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The bill supports military personnel strengths and activities which are foundational to the veteran community.
- Scored +1
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
Military construction projects often occur in and benefit rural areas hosting defense installations.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Clarified Legislative Intent: By amending the long title, the bill ensures that the official record accurately reflects that the act authorizes appropriations for fiscal year 2026 regarding military activities, military construction, and defense activities of the Department of Energy. (Long Title Amendment)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are identified within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Defense construction authorizations provide opportunities for businesses within the government contracting sector. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Military construction projects often occur in and benefit rural areas hosting defense installations. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The bill supports military personnel strengths and activities which are foundational to the veteran community.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The authorization of appropriations for military activities and construction supports job stability within the defense sector.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — The authorization for military construction includes the development of essential defense infrastructure.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution corrects the official long title to ensure legislative records accurately reflect the bill's purpose.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The authorization of military personnel strengths and activities supports the infrastructure of veteran support systems.
- Enrolled Bill
The final version, on its way to the President
Arrived from the other chamber; nothing has been done to it there yet
- 12/18/2025
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- 12/17/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8874; text: CR S8874)
- 12/15/2025
- Received in the Senate.
- 12/11/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H5802)
- On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H5802)
- Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H5802)
- Mr. Rogers (AL) asked unanimous consent to consider as introduced.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.