A Republican bill with 4 Democratic cosponsors · See all 7 cosponsors
Last activity — Held at the desk.
Passed one chamber, waiting for the other to take it up
Passed one chamber, and the other has not yet sent it to a committee or put it on its calendar.
The other chamber will hand it to a committee, place it on its calendar, or leave it where it is. Nothing has been decided, and a bill can sit here indefinitely.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed Senate unanimous consent
- Awaiting House
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Improving Police Critical Aid for Responding to Emergencies Act or the Improving Police CARE Act. It sets standards for trauma kits purchased using funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. The Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance must develop performance standards for these trauma kits within 180 days. The bill explicitly defines what a trauma kit is and lists the required components it must contain. Grantees may only purchase trauma kits that meet these new performance standards or separately acquire and assemble components that meet them. The bill also allows the Director to develop optional best practices for law enforcement agencies regarding training, deployment, and maintenance.
Yes
- Scored +3
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
Improves immediate emergency medical response and trauma care availability through standardized kits.
- Scored +2
Does this change how police departments operate?
Enhances the capability of law enforcement to provide life-saving medical aid during emergencies.
- Scored +1
Does this give the federal government more power?
Increases federal oversight by establishing mandatory performance standards for grant-funded equipment.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2 adding subsection (d)(2)(A) ensures that grantees may only purchase trauma kits using specific grant funds if the kits meet established performance standards, which helps guarantee the quality of life-saving equipment provided to people.
-
Section 2 adding subsection (d)(3)(A) requires the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance to consult with trauma surgeons, emergency medical professionals, and law enforcement organizations to develop and publish performance standards, bringing expert medical knowledge into the equipment selection process.
-
Section 2 adding subsection (d)(4) mandates specific required components for trauma kits, such as a tourniquet recommended by the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care, a bleeding control bandage, and proper instructional documents, ensuring that kits contain essential tools to control life-threatening hemorrhages.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no explicitly stated negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Improves immediate emergency medical response and trauma care availability through standardized kits.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this change how police departments operate? — Enhances the capability of law enforcement to provide life-saving medical aid during emergencies.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Increases federal oversight by establishing mandatory performance standards for grant-funded equipment.
- 8/1/2025
- Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Held at the desk.
- Received in the House.
- 7/29/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4796; text: CR S4797)
- 7/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2025
- Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. Without written report.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 84.
- 5/15/2025
- Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
- 5/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/5/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Ashley MoodyRepublican · Florida
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island