A Republican bill with 31 Democratic cosponsors · See all 71 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Pharmacy Benefit Manager Reform Act of 2025. It targets pharmacy benefit managers and aims to increase transparency, accountability, and fair access within Medicare and Medicaid prescription drug programs. The legislation mandates that prescription drug plans allow any willing pharmacy meeting standard contract terms to join their networks. It establishes strict rules limiting the types of income pharmacy benefit managers can receive to flat, fair-market bona fide service fees. The bill also requires extensive reporting on drug costs, pricing guarantees, and supply chain compensation by pharmacy benefit managers to plan sponsors and federal authorities. Finally, it bans abusive spread pricing models in Medicaid and enhances enforcement through civil monetary penalties for non-compliance.
Yes· 3 of 15
- Scored +7
Does this lower the price of prescription medicines?
The bill implements significant transparency and oversight measures aimed at lowering drug costs through better pricing models.
- Scored +7
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill mandates extensive reporting and publication of data to increase transparency in the drug pricing supply chain.
- Scored +6
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
The bill directly benefits Medicare beneficiaries by improving pharmacy access and drug price transparency.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Would billionaires be better off under this?
Pharmacy benefit managers face stricter regulations and potential loss of certain revenue streams.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(a) requires prescription drug plan sponsors to permit any willing pharmacy to participate in their network as long as the pharmacy meets standard, reasonable, and relevant contract terms. This gives everyday people more choices and easier access to local pharmacies they trust.
-
Section 3(a) restricts pharmacy benefit managers from collecting income other than flat, fair-market bona fide service fees and requires them to fully pass through manufacturer rebates and discounts to plan sponsors. This transparency and restriction on hidden profits can help lower overall drug spending and relieve financial pressure on everyday individuals.
-
Section 3(a) also requires pharmacy benefit managers to submit detailed annual reports regarding drug utilization, pricing, and costs, which are subject to audits by plan sponsors. Holding these middlemen accountable helps ensure that elected officials and program administrators are keeping costs transparent for the public.
-
Section 4 and Section 6 add oversight and reporting requirements for group health plans and Medicaid programs, and ban spread pricing in Medicaid. Preventing spread pricing stops middlemen from taking hidden cuts between what plans pay and what pharmacies receive, ensuring taxpayer and beneficiary dollars are spent fairly on actual medical care.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Section 2(f) and Section 3(a) appropriate hundreds of millions of dollars in new government funds—including $188,000,000 for CMS program management, $113,000,000 for subsection implementation, and $20,000,000 for the Inspector General—to carry out these new federal mandates. Taxpayers ultimately bear the burden of funding these administrative costs and government oversight expansions.
-
Section 2(c) and Section 5(a) establish heavy civil monetary penalties up to $100,000 for pharmacies or plan sponsors that fail to comply with survey reporting or contract standards. While designed to enforce rules, aggressive penalties or compliance burdens could potentially strain smaller, independent operations or limit the resources available for patient care.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would retired people be better off under this? — Medicare beneficiaries, often retirees, benefit from increased pharmacy choice and transparency. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill provides specific protections and monitoring for essential retail pharmacies in rural areas. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill directly benefits Medicare beneficiaries by improving pharmacy access and drug price transparency. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Improved drug price transparency and Medicaid protections can assist low-income households. Would business owners be better off under this? — Retail pharmacy owners benefit from more transparent and reasonable contract standards. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Reduced drug costs through enhanced oversight can alleviate costs for middle-class families. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Pharmacy benefit managers face stricter regulations and potential loss of certain revenue streams.
- Healthcare
- Does this lower the price of prescription medicines? — The bill implements significant transparency and oversight measures aimed at lowering drug costs through better pricing models. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill aims to ensure pharmacy access and choice for Medicare beneficiaries. Does this lower what people pay for private health insurance? — Increased transparency in pharmacy benefit management can lead to more competitive pricing and lower premiums. Does this put more money into Medicaid, the health coverage for people on low incomes? — The bill mandates transparent pricing and oversight in Medicaid to ensure more accurate and fair payments.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates extensive reporting and publication of data to increase transparency in the drug pricing supply chain. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands federal oversight and enforcement powers regarding pharmacy benefit managers.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill increases transparency and oversight of pharmacy benefit managers to protect consumer interests. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill supports essential retail pharmacies by establishing standards for reasonable and relevant contract terms.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — The bill specifically protects essential retail pharmacies in rural areas.
- 9/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 12/9/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 12/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/12/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/31/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/21/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/30/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/25/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/21/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/16/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/10/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
4 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Rick AllenRepublican · Georgia
Jodey ArringtonRepublican · Texas
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Cliff BentzRepublican · Oregon
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Nikki BudzinskiDemocrat · Illinois
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Robert BresnahanRepublican · Pennsylvania
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Kat CammackRepublican · Florida
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
James ComerRepublican · Kentucky
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Neal DunnRepublican · Florida
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Scott FranklinRepublican · Florida
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Marie PerezDemocrat · Washington
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
John JoyceRepublican · Pennsylvania
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Jennifer KiggansRepublican · Virginia
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Nicole MalliotakisRepublican · New York
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Robert MenendezDemocrat · New Jersey
Ryan MackenzieRepublican · Pennsylvania
Mark MessmerRepublican · Indiana
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
Johnny OlszewskiDemocrat · Maryland
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Harold RogersRepublican · Kentucky
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Hillary ScholtenDemocrat · Michigan
Suhas SubramanyamDemocrat · Virginia
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas