Gregory Murphy (R-NC)
Protecting Patient Access to Cancer and Complex Therapies Act
A Republican bill with 17 Democratic cosponsors · See all 58 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
- This bill is titled the Protecting Patient Access to Cancer and Complex Therapies Act.
- It amends title XVIII of the Social Security Act.
- The legislation requires manufacturers to provide a rebate for selected drugs and biological products that are subject to maximum fair price negotiation.
- It outlines the specific calculations for these manufacturer rebates and beneficiary coinsurance amounts.
- The bill directs rebate deposits into the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund.
- It also establishes penalties for failing to comply with the rebate requirements.
Yes· 3 of 13
- Scored +7
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Directly reduces out-of-pocket drug costs for Medicare beneficiaries, who are predominantly seniors.
- Scored +7
Would retired people be better off under this?
Lowers medical costs for retirees on Medicare Part B.
- Scored +6
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Reduces the financial burden of expensive cancer and complex therapies.
The opposite
- Scored -4
Would business owners be better off under this?
Increases financial burden on drug manufacturers through mandatory rebates.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2(b)(1) introduces a requirement for manufacturers to pay a rebate for selected drugs and biological products subject to maximum fair price negotiation. This could be viewed as positive because it ensures that financial adjustments are made regarding the costs of these specific medications.
- Section 2(b)(1) states that rebate amounts paid by manufacturers will be deposited into the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund. This is a positive outcome as it directs funds back into the trust fund established under section 1841.
- Section 2(b)(2) calculates beneficiary coinsurance based on the MFP+6 amount for selected drugs. This could benefit individuals by tying their coinsurance amounts directly to the maximum fair price calculation framework.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 2(b)(1) imposes new administrative and financial requirements on manufacturers to provide rebates within 30 days of receiving information from the Secretary. This could potentially be viewed as a heavy burden on drug manufacturers.
- Section 2(b)(4) applies a civil money penalty for the failure to comply with these rebate requirements, using the penalties established under subsection (i)(7). This acts as a strict punitive measure for non-compliance.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would retired people be better off under this? — Lowers medical costs for retirees on Medicare Part B. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Directly reduces out-of-pocket drug costs for Medicare beneficiaries, who are predominantly seniors. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Reduces the financial burden of expensive cancer and complex therapies. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Reduces drug costs for disabled individuals eligible for Medicare. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Decreases healthcare costs for those utilizing selected Medicare drugs. Would business owners be better off under this? — Increases financial burden on drug manufacturers through mandatory rebates.
- Healthcare
- Does this lower the price of prescription medicines? — Lowers the beneficiary's coinsurance amount by basing it on the Maximum Fair Price instead of the Average Sales Price. Does this put more money into Medicare, the health coverage for people over 65? — Mandates rebates from drug manufacturers to be deposited into the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Lowers financial barriers for patients accessing cancer and complex therapies.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Reduces out-of-pocket coinsurance costs for beneficiaries for selected complex therapies. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — Increases the solvency of the Medicare trust fund through mandatory manufacturer rebates. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Rebates are deposited into the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund, potentially reducing the need for general fund subsidies.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Expands federal authority to mandate rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Reduces healthcare spending for low-income seniors and disabled individuals on Medicare.
- 11/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/9/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 10/5/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/24/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/20/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 4/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/2/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/28/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 10/24/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/7/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Mark AlfordRepublican · Missouri
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Troy BaldersonRepublican · Ohio
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Juan CiscomaniRepublican · Arizona
Herbert ConawayDemocrat · New Jersey
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Neal DunnRepublican · Florida
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Jake EllzeyRepublican · Texas
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lance GoodenRepublican · Texas
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
Adam GrayDemocrat · California
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Kevin HernRepublican · Oklahoma
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
John JoyceRepublican · Pennsylvania
Mike KellyRepublican · Pennsylvania
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Mike KennedyRepublican · Utah
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Darin LaHoodRepublican · Illinois
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Nicole MalliotakisRepublican · New York
Carol MillerRepublican · West Virginia
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Jared MoskowitzDemocrat · Florida
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Lloyd SmuckerRepublican · Pennsylvania
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas