A Republican bill with 34 Republican cosponsors · See all 34 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Punishing Illegal Immigrant Felons Act of 2025" seeks to increase criminal penalties for certain aliens in the United States. It raises the maximum prison time for improperly entering the country from 2 years to 5 years. It also adds a mandatory minimum prison sentence of 5 years for those who improperly enter and are later convicted of a crime punishable by more than one year. Additionally, it increases penalties for aliens who previously were removed from the United States, raising some maximums to 10 or 15 years and establishing a 10-year minimum for specific convictions.
Yes
- Scored +6
Does this tighten control of the border?
Increases prison terms for improper entry to serve as a stronger deterrent.
- Scored +4
Does this give the federal government more power?
Expands federal criminal penalties and mandates for immigration-related offenses.
The opposite· 3 of 6
- Scored -9
Would immigrants be better off under this?
Significantly increases prison terms and mandates for immigrants convicted of crimes.
- Scored -7
Does this shorten or soften prison sentences?
The bill imposes strict mandatory minimum sentences, reducing judicial flexibility.
- Scored -6
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?
Likely disproportionate impact due to the focus on improper entry and increased incarceration of immigrants.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased penalties for improper entry: Section 2(a)(1) increases the prison term from 2 years to 5 years, which is intended to provide a stronger deterrent against improper entry.
-
Additional penalties for criminals: Section 2(a)(2) requires an additional 5 years of imprisonment for aliens who improperly enter and are convicted of crimes punishable by more than one year, targeting individuals who commit crimes.
-
Stricter penalties for those previously removed: Section 2(b) increases prison terms for those who return after being removed, including mandatory minimums of 10 years for those convicted of aggravated felonies, other felonies, or crimes punishable by more than one year.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Longer mandatory prison sentences: Section 2(a)(2) and Section 2(b)(2) impose mandatory minimum prison sentences of 5 and 10 years respectively, which removes flexibility in sentencing for convicted individuals.
-
Increased incarceration durations: Section 2(a)(1) and Section 2(b)(1) increase the maximum prison terms for improper entry and reentry, leading to longer periods of imprisonment for those convicted.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — Significantly increases prison terms and mandates for immigrants convicted of crimes. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Likely disproportionate impact due to the focus on improper entry and increased incarceration of immigrants.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this tighten control of the border? — Increases prison terms for improper entry to serve as a stronger deterrent. Does this shorten or soften prison sentences? — The bill imposes strict mandatory minimum sentences, reducing judicial flexibility. Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — Focuses on criminalization and punishment rather than legal pathways to status.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Expands federal criminal penalties and mandates for immigration-related offenses. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Mandatory minimum sentences limit the ability of courts to consider individual circumstances. Does this leave more decisions to the states? — Imposes federal mandatory minimums that override state sentencing discretion.
- 11/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/7/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 29 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Michael BaumgartnerRepublican · Washington
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Chuck EdwardsRepublican · North Carolina
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Richard HudsonRepublican · North Carolina
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Brian JackRepublican · Georgia
Mike KennedyRepublican · Utah
Brian MastRepublican · Florida
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Mark MessmerRepublican · Indiana
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Robert OnderRepublican · Missouri
David RouzerRepublican · North Carolina
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
Elise StefanikRepublican · New York
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey