A Republican bill with 40 Republican cosponsors · See all 40 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the ``Fairness for High-Skilled Americans Act of 2025'', aims to change the Immigration and Nationality Act. The primary goal is to eliminate the Optional Practical Training Program. It specifically targets employment authorization for aliens present in the United States under section 101(a)(15)(F)(i). Under this act, no such person would be allowed employment authorization through this program or any successor program without an express Act of Congress.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 3 of 8
- Scored -8
Would students be better off under this?
The elimination of OPT removes a critical post-graduation employment path for many international students.
- Scored -7
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The bill significantly restricts the legal work opportunities available to nonimmigrant students.
- Scored -6
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
The bill negatively impacts international students and young professionals seeking work through the OPT program.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Legislative Oversight: By requiring an express Act of Congress to authorize such a program, the bill ensures that any future versions of the Optional Practical Training Program must be specifically approved by lawmakers (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Employment Authorization: Aliens present in the United States as nonimmigrants under section 101(a)(15)(F)(i) would no longer be provided employment authorization via the Optional Practical Training Program (Section 2).
-
Elimination of Successor Programs: The bill prevents the use of any successor program to the Optional Practical Training Program unless Congress passes a specific law to authorize it (Section 2).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would students be better off under this? — The elimination of OPT removes a critical post-graduation employment path for many international students. Would immigrants be better off under this? — The bill significantly restricts the legal work opportunities available to nonimmigrant students. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill negatively impacts international students and young professionals seeking work through the OPT program. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The elimination of OPT disproportionately affects Asian American international students and professionals. Would business owners be better off under this? — Employers relying on high-skilled international talent via the OPT program will face more restrictive hiring processes.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — Eliminating the OPT program may reduce job opportunities for international students in the U.S. labor market. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Reducing high-skilled labor availability through the elimination of OPT could negatively impact economic growth.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — Eliminating OPT may reduce the pipeline of international talent contributing to scientific research.
- 10/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/24/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 10/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Tim BurchettRepublican · Tennessee
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
H. GriffithRepublican · Virginia
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Marjorie GreeneRepublican · Georgia
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Brian JackRepublican · Georgia
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Tom McClintockRepublican · California
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Cory MillsRepublican · Florida
Riley MooreRepublican · West Virginia
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
Robert OnderRepublican · Missouri
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Jimmy PatronisRepublican · Florida
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Matt Van EppsRepublican · Tennessee
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin