Anna Paulina Luna

Became law (2)

• 

  Pete Stauber (R-MN)· Apr 27

  Cosponsored

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

  H.J.Res. 140 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican resolution with 4 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The Senate voted 50–49 on Apr 16.

  This joint resolution addresses a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management. The rule involves Public Land Order No. 7917 regarding the withdrawal of federal lands.

  Yes· 2 of 4

  • Scored +3

    Would people in rural areas be better off under this?

    The resolution prevents the federal withdrawal of land in specific Minnesota counties, leaving land available for local-driven uses.

  • Scored +3

    Does this invest in rural communities?

    By stopping the land withdrawal in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, the bill keeps federal lands available for local development and use.

  The opposite

  • Scored -5

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The resolution reverses a land withdrawal, which prevents the federal government from restricting certain uses of those lands for environmental preservation.

  • Scored -4

    Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?

    The resolution nullifies a specific Bureau of Land Management land withdrawal order, altering how those public lands are managed.

• 

  John Rose (R-TN)· Sep 5

  Cosponsored

  Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act

  H.R. 2808 Finance and Financial Sector

  A Republican bill with 33 Democratic cosponsors.

  Became law

  This bill aims to amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act. It seeks to prevent consumer reporting agencies from sharing consumer reports with others after a person requests a report for a residential mortgage loan.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +7

    Does this give people more control over their personal data?

    The bill strengthens data privacy by preventing the sharing of credit reports after a mortgage request.

  • Scored +7

    Does this protect people from being watched or searched?

    The bill provides significant protection for individual privacy regarding sensitive financial information.

  No question was scored the opposite.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (28)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  Gus Bilirakis (R-FL)· Nov 12

  Cosponsored

  Major Richard Star Act

  H.R. 2102 Armed Forces and National Security

  A Republican bill with 207 Democratic cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  392 – 18

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services · Nov 12

  This bill changes the rules to allow certain military retirees to receive both veterans' disability compensation and retired pay at the same time.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +8

    Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?

    This bill provides significant financial relief to veterans with combat-related disabilities by allowing them to receive both retired pay and disability compensation concurrently.

  • Scored +7

    Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?

    The bill increases financial benefits for veterans with combat-related disabilities by allowing concurrent receipt of retired pay and disability compensation.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Nicholas Langworthy (R-NY)· Sep 16

  Cosponsored

  Northern Border Security Enhancement and Review Act

  H.R. 5517 Immigration

  A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor.

  Passed the House

  By voice vote, no names recorded

  Now: in the queue for a floor vote, with no date set · Sep 16

  This bill updates the Northern Border Security Review Act by requiring regular updates to threat analysis and border strategies.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +5

    Does this tighten control of the border?

    The bill enhances security through mandated strategy updates and performance measures for air and maritime environments.

  • Scored +3

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill improves transparency through required congressional briefings and performance measure developments.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Bryan Steil (R-WI)· Jul 22

  Cosponsored

  Stop Insider Trading Act

  H.R. 7008 Congress

  A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  232 – 198

  This bill places strict purchasing limits and transparency rules on stock trading for Members of Congress, their spouses, and their dependent children.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +6

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill requires Members of Congress to publicly disclose intent to sell specific investments before doing so.

  • Scored +5

    Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?

    The bill restricts Members of Congress from trading specific securities, which may reduce potential conflicts of interest and insider trading advantages.

  The opposite· 2 of 3

  • Scored -3

    Does this protect the right to vote?

    The bill imposes new photo identification requirements for all federal elections, which may create barriers to voting.

  • Scored -2

    Would households on low incomes be better off under this?

    The new photo ID requirements may create administrative or financial hurdles for low-income voters.

And 25 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 41 no, 53 yes. 9 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 8 no)
• Would business owners be better off under this? 23 no, 40 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber
• Would children be better off under this? 18 no, 38 yes. 7 of these passed a chamber (2 yes, 5 no)
• Would immigrants be better off under this? 50 no, 5 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 4 no)

What else they would change

• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 9 no, 116 yes. 11 of these passed a chamber
• Does this give the federal government more power? 18 no, 98 yes. 9 of these passed a chamber (7 yes, 2 no)
• Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? 30 no, 25 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 3 no)
• Does this reduce what the federal government spends? 18 no, 34 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber