Marjorie Taylor Greene

Became law (3)

• 

  Pete Stauber (R-MN)· Dec 12

  Cosponsored

  Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act

  H.R. 452 Sports and Recreation

  A Republican bill with 107 Democratic cosponsors.

  Became law

  This Act authorizes the award of 3 Congressional Gold Medals to the members of the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team. The medals recognize the team's victory over the Soviet Union during the 1980 Winter Olympics.

  Yes

  • Scored +1

    Is this likely to grow the economy?

    The sale of duplicate bronze medals provides a small influx of revenue to the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.

  No question was scored the opposite.

• 

  Steve Scalise (R-LA)· Jul 24

  Cosponsored

  Rescissions Act of 2025

  H.R. 4 Economics and Public Finance

  A Republican bill with 5 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The Senate voted 51–48 on Jul 17.

  The Rescissions Act of 2025 cancels various budget authorizations as proposed by the President on June 3, 2025.

  The opposite· 2 of 15

  • Scored -5

    Does this make birth control easier to get?

    The bill rescinds $500,000,000 from Global Health Programs and explicitly notes that protections do not apply to family planning and reproductive health programs.

  • Scored -3

    Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster?

    Rescinding funds from International Disaster Assistance could negatively impact disaster relief efforts.

  No question was scored yes.

• 

  Gary Palmer (R-AL)· May 9

  Cosponsored

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters".

  H.J.Res. 20 Energy

  A Republican resolution with 29 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Became law

  The Senate voted 53–44 on Apr 10.

  This joint resolution seeks to overturn a specific rule from the Department of Energy.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +3

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Manufacturers of gas-fired water heaters are relieved of the compliance costs associated with the disapproved energy standards.

  • Scored +3

    Does this make it easier to run a small business?

    By nullifying the Department of Energy standards, the bill reduces regulatory burdens on businesses that manufacture or sell gas-fired water heaters.

  The opposite

  • Scored -3

    Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?

    The reversal of energy conservation standards may allow for continued use of less efficient appliances, potentially increasing carbon emissions over time.

  • Scored -2

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    The resolution removes specific energy efficiency standards designed to protect the environment through reduced energy consumption.

Passed one chamber, waiting on the other (12)

Halfway: the other chamber has to pass the same text before it can go to the President.

• 

  Marjorie Greene (R-GA)· Dec 17

  Their bill

  Protect Children’s Innocence Act

  H.R. 3492 Crime and Law Enforcement

  A Republican bill with 44 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  216 – 211

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary · Dec 18

  This bill proposes amendments to title 18 of the United States Code regarding the treatment of minors.

  Yes

  • Scored +5

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The bill expands federal criminal jurisdiction over medical procedures involving minors.

  The opposite· 2 of 4

  • Scored -8

    Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?

    The bill directly targets and criminalizes gender-affirming surgeries and hormone treatments used by the LGBTQ community.

  • Scored -7

    Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people?

    The bill restricts access to gender-affirming medical treatments which negatively impacts the rights and autonomy of LGBTQ+ individuals.

• 

  Marjorie Greene (R-GA)· Jun 26

  Their bill

  Special Interest Alien Reporting Act of 2025

  H.R. 275 Immigration

  A Republican bill with 6 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  231 – 182

  Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs · Jun 27

  This bill requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to publish monthly data regarding special interest aliens. These are individuals who potentially pose a national security risk based on travel pattern analysis.

  Yes· 2 of 3

  • Scored +7

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill enhances transparency by requiring monthly data publication on a public webpage.

  • Scored +5

    Does this tighten control of the border?

    The bill enhances border security transparency by requiring detailed reporting on high-risk alien encounters.

  The opposite

  • Scored -2

    Would immigrants be better off under this?

    The bill focuses on tracking 'special interest aliens,' which may increase scrutiny on immigrant populations.

• 

  Marjorie Greene (R-GA)· May 8

  Their bill

  Gulf of America Act

  H.R. 276 Public Lands and Natural Resources

  A Republican bill with 17 Republican cosponsors. See the voting map.

  Passed the House

  211 – 206

  Now: in the queue for a floor vote, with no date set · May 12

  This bill aims to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico. Under this act, the body of water will be officially known as the "Gulf of America."

  Yes

  • Scored +1

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill mandates that all federal agencies update their official documents and maps to reflect the new name within 180 days.

  No question was scored the opposite.

And 9 more on their Sponsored and Cosponsored pages.

Who their bills would affect

• Would households on low incomes be better off under this? 17 no, 7 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 3 no)
• Would business owners be better off under this? 9 no, 10 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 1 no)
• Would immigrants be better off under this? 14 no, 1 yes. 5 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 4 no)
• Would children be better off under this? 7 no, 5 yes. 4 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 3 no)

What else they would change

• Does this give the federal government more power? 12 no, 27 yes. 6 of these passed a chamber (5 yes, 1 no)
• Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? 6 no, 31 yes. 6 of these passed a chamber
• Does this reduce what the federal government spends? 9 no, 16 yes. 2 of these passed a chamber (1 yes, 1 no)
• Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? 4 no, 11 yes. 3 of these passed a chamber (2 yes, 1 no)