The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
In committee 8 bills
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology · Dec 2
This bill amends the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977. The legislation authorizes capacity building grants for community college agriculture and natural resources programs.
Yes· 2 of 16
Scored +7
Would students be better off under this?
Students at community colleges gain hands-on training, updated equipment, apprenticeships, and career preparation opportunities.
Scored +6
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Students and young adults benefit from expanded community college agricultural programs, experiential training, and apprenticeships.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means · Mar 25
This bill aims to authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment to products from Uzbekistan. It allows the President to determine that Title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 should no longer apply to Uzbekistan.
Yes· 2 of 6
Scored +5
Does this make trade with other countries easier?
The bill focuses specifically on improving trade relations through the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment.
Scored +3
Would business owners be better off under this?
Importers and exporters of products from Uzbekistan will benefit from more stable trade relations.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Feb 25
This bill aims to eliminate nonessential civil service positions within the executive branch. It defines these positions as those not designated as excepted from furloughs during a lapse in appropriations.
Yes
Scored +5
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill prohibits the obligation or expenditure of federal funds for the salaries and expenses of abolished positions.
The opposite· 2 of 5
Scored -7
Would union members be better off under this?
The bill reduces job security and the overall number of available civil service positions for workers.
Scored -5
Is this likely to create jobs?
The bill reduces the total number of civil service positions in the executive branch by abolishing nonessential ones.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Armed Services · Feb 10
This bill aims to amend title 10 of the United States Code. This bill seeks to provide expedited access to specific military installations of the Department of Defense.
Yes
Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill increases transparency by allowing Members of Congress to conduct unannounced oversight visits to military installations.
The opposite
Scored -1
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?
By allowing unannounced access to military installations, the bill may slightly reduce the effectiveness of standard security screening protocols.
