Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
A resolution recognizing World Oceans Day and celebrating the maritime heritage, ocean leadership, fisheries stewardship, and coastal communities of the United States.
A Democratic resolution with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S2667)
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
S. Res. 759 is a resolution to recognize June 8, 2026, as World Oceans Day. It celebrates the maritime heritage, ocean leadership, fisheries stewardship, and coastal communities of the United States. The resolution honors various groups, including fishermen, scientists, and members of the Armed Forces. It also recognizes the 50th anniversary of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and the 20th anniversary of the Marine Debris Program. Finally, it reaffirms the U.S. commitment to ocean exploration, scientific discovery, and responsible stewardship of ocean resources.
Yes· 3 of 28
- Scored +5
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
Recognizes the Marine Debris Program and efforts to protect marine ecosystems from plastics.
- Scored +3
Would business owners be better off under this?
Positively recognizes shipbuilding, shipping, and seafood production industries.
- Scored +3
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
Celebrates sustainable fisheries management and stewardship of ocean resources.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Maritime Workers: The resolution honors the contributions of fishermen, mariners, shipbuilders, port workers, and coastal communities, recognizing their role as economic engines that support millions of jobs. (Resolved section 3)
-
Fisheries Protection: By recognizing the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the resolution acknowledges the protection of American fishermen from foreign overfishing and the rebuilding of fish stocks. (Resolved section 4)
-
Environmental Protection: The resolution recognizes the Marine Debris Program and the Save Our Seas Act of 2018, which aim to reduce marine debris to protect waterways, fisheries, and coastal communities. (Resolved section 5)
-
Economic Contribution: The text highlights that the ocean economy contributes trillions of dollars annually and supports millions of American workers. (Whereas clauses)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for individuals or groups are mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Positively recognizes shipbuilding, shipping, and seafood production industries. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Specifically honors the contributions of indigenous communities to the nation's prosperity. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Supports coastal and fishing communities. Would union members be better off under this? — Honors port workers, shipbuilders, and mariners. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Honors the contributions of members of the Armed Forces. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Positive impact on the overall maritime economic sector. Would children be better off under this? — Ensures long-term fisheries stewardship for future generations. Would farmers be better off under this? — Supports aquaculture and seafood production. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Supports the overall growth of the ocean economy. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Positive impact on the overall maritime economic sector. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Supports jobs in fishing and port work which are key employment drivers in coastal areas. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Supports current maritime and fishing workforce. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Supports the broader maritime economy. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Honors maritime heritage and traditions. Would students be better off under this? — Promotes scientific discovery and ocean exploration. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Positive impact on the overall maritime economic sector. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Supports port cities and urban waterfronts. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Supports economic opportunities in the ocean economy.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Recognizes the Marine Debris Program and efforts to protect marine ecosystems from plastics. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — Celebrates sustainable fisheries management and stewardship of ocean resources. Does this invest in rural communities? — Supports coastal and waterfront communities.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — Recognizes the ocean economy's trillion-dollar contribution to the U.S. economy. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Supports the economic viability of fishing and maritime-related small businesses. Is this likely to create jobs? — Reaffirms commitment to ocean economic opportunities and maritime leadership which supports millions of jobs.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad? — Encourages international engagement to combat marine debris. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — Reaffirms US maritime leadership and engagement in international ocean stewardship. Does this make trade with other countries easier? — Recognizes the importance of maritime infrastructure in powering global trade.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — Reaffirms commitment to ocean exploration and scientific discovery.
- 6/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S2667)
- 1 Cosponsor added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Lisa MurkowskiRepublican · Alaska
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska