Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR)
Recognizing World Oceans Day and celebrating the maritime heritage, ocean leadership, fisheries stewardship, and coastal communities of the United States.
A Democratic resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes World Oceans Day and celebrates the maritime heritage, ocean leadership, fisheries stewardship, and coastal communities of the United States. It notes that 2026 marks the 250th anniversary of the country, the 50th anniversary of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, and the 20th anniversary of the Marine Debris Program. The text honors the contributions of American fishermen, mariners, members of the Armed Forces, scientists, shipbuilders, and indigenous communities. It acknowledges the economic and security contributions of the ocean, including the Navy, Coast Guard, and Marines defending shores and international commerce. Finally, the House of Representatives resolves to honor these groups, recognize these anniversaries, and reaffirm its commitment to responsible ocean stewardship.
Yes· 3 of 12
- Scored +2
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
Honors members of the Armed Forces, including the Navy, Coast Guard, and Marines.
- Scored +2
Is this likely to create jobs?
The resolution recognizes the economic contributions of the ocean economy and maritime industries which support millions of jobs.
- Scored +2
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
Recognizes and honors commercial fishermen, seafood producers, and working waterfronts.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Honoring Workers and Communities: The resolution honors the contributions of America's fishermen, mariners, members of the Armed Forces, scientists, explorers, shipbuilders, port workers, indigenous communities, coastal communities, and working waterfronts, which acknowledges the hard work of these citizens as outlined in resolved paragraph (3).
-
Celebrating Fisheries Management: The resolution recognizes the 50th anniversary of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, noting its role in strengthening American fisheries, supporting coastal economies, protecting seafood resources, and ensuring long-term fisheries stewardship as stated in resolved paragraph (4).
-
Addressing Marine Debris: The resolution recognizes the 20th anniversary of the Marine Debris Program and bipartisan congressional leadership through the Save Our Seas Act of 2018 to reduce marine debris and protect coastal communities and waterways, as found in resolved paragraph (5).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Identified: The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences, burdens, or penalties for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Honors members of the Armed Forces, including the Navy, Coast Guard, and Marines. Would business owners be better off under this? — Supports commercial fishing and maritime business owners by recognizing their economic contributions. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Explicitly honors indigenous communities for their contributions to maritime heritage and fisheries. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Supports coastal and working waterfront communities that rely heavily on maritime and fishing industries.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Recognizes and honors commercial fishermen, seafood producers, and working waterfronts. Is this likely to create jobs? — The resolution recognizes the economic contributions of the ocean economy and maritime industries which support millions of jobs. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Acknowledges the trillion-dollar contribution of the ocean economy and supports working waterfronts.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Celebrates the 50th anniversary of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and the 20th anniversary of the Marine Debris Program to protect marine ecosystems. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — Supports responsible stewardship of ocean resources and protection of coastal waterways.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — Honors the role of the Armed Forces in safeguarding international commerce and freedom of navigation. Does this make trade with other countries easier? — Recognizes the importance of international commerce and global trade supported by maritime infrastructure.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — Recognizes the contributions of ocean scientists, exploration, and NOAA in advancing marine discovery.
- 6/8/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia