Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
A resolution reaffirming the importance of the United States promoting the safety, health, and well-being of refugees and displaced persons in the United States and around the world.
A Democratic resolution with 23 Democratic cosponsors · See all 24 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S3473-3474)
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution reaffirms the United States' commitment to promoting the safety and well-being of refugees and displaced persons globally. It highlights the urgent need for comprehensive and humane policies to address the current global displacement crisis. The text specifically calls for the lifting of the indefinite suspension of the United States Refugee Admissions Program. It also advocates for the restoration of asylum protections and the rejection of harmful bans or restrictions. Furthermore, it calls on various government officials to strengthen international leadership in responding to displacement. Ultimately, the resolution seeks to ensure that refugees have access to protection, peace, and hope.
Yes· 3 of 15
- Scored +9
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The bill advocates for the restoration of refugee admissions and asylum protections for those fleeing persecution.
- Scored +8
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
The bill specifically advocates for the protection and resettlement of LGBTQI+ refugees.
- Scored +8
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
The resolution calls for addressing barriers through accessible infrastructure and social protection schemes.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Restoration of Refugee Admissions: Lifting the indefinite suspension of the United States Refugee Admissions Program would provide a path for many individuals, including those currently stranded, to find safety in the United States (Resolution Section 6).
-
Protection of Asylum Rights: Rejecting harmful bans and restrictions would restore asylum protections and ensure individuals have access to due process at the United States border (Resolution Section 4).
-
Support for Vulnerable Populations: Strengthening leadership in protecting those facing gender-based violence, human trafficking, and persecution helps secure the safety of highly vulnerable groups (Resolution Section 7A).
-
Economic and Community Contributions: Encouraging resettlement allows refugees to integrate into communities, join the workforce, and contribute to the economy through taxes and local commerce (Preamble/Whereas clauses).
-
Addressing Disability Barriers: Implementing measures to ensure accessible infrastructure and social protection schemes would assist refugees living with disabilities (Resolution Section 7H).
-
Aid to Host Countries: Providing humanitarian and development assistance helps alleviate the pressure on frontline countries that host the majority of the world's refugees (Resolution Section 7D).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Impact of Admissions Suspension: The current indefinite suspension of the United States Refugee Admissions Program has left over 100,000 conditionally approved refugees, 22,000 ready for departure, and 12,000 individuals with booked flights in a state of being indefinitely stranded (Preamble/Whereas clauses).
-
Risks of Foreign Assistance Cuts: Reductions in United States foreign assistance have led to decreased support for refugees abroad, such as reduced food rations in refugee camps (Preamble/Whereas clauses).
-
Consequences of Travel Bans: The implementation of travel bans and the restriction of entry for certain nationalities can deny people fleeing conflict and violence the opportunity to seek safe refuge (Preamble/Whereas clauses).
-
Risks of Deportation: For individuals subject to the principle of non-refoulement, being deported to countries of origin or third countries could result in harm due to widespread conflict or persecution (Preamble/Whereas clauses).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — The bill advocates for the restoration of refugee admissions and asylum protections for those fleeing persecution. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The bill specifically advocates for the protection and resettlement of LGBTQI+ refugees. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The resolution calls for addressing barriers through accessible infrastructure and social protection schemes. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution calls for protection of women facing increased risks of violence and exploitation. Would children be better off under this? — The resolution specifically mentions supporting the education of refugee children.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — The resolution advocates for lifting the suspension of the refugee admissions program and restoring asylum protections. Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — The resolution calls for addressing barriers faced by refugees with disabilities through accessible infrastructure and services. Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The resolution explicitly supports the efforts of the UNHCR to increase protection for LGBTQI+ refugees. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The bill calls for strengthening leadership in protecting those facing gender-based violence.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this send more money or help to other countries? — The bill advocates for robust funding for international assistance to help refugees and host countries. Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad? — The bill calls for strengthening the United States' international leadership role. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The resolution emphasizes international solidarity and leadership in responding to displacement.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill highlights that refugees contribute significantly to total revenue through taxes and local commerce. Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill notes that refugee resettlement helps address labor demand in critical industries and creates new jobs.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The resolution emphasizes that refugees and asylum seekers should be afforded full due process.
- 7/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S3473-3474)
- 23 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-HRES-533: Reaffirming the importance of the United States promoting the safety, health, and well-being of refugees and displaced persons in the United States and around the world.
- 119-HRES-1375: Reaffirming the importance of the United States promoting the safety, health, and well-being of refugees and displaced persons in the United States and around the world.
- 119-SRES-775: A resolution reaffirming the importance of the United States promoting the safety, health, and well-being of refugees and displaced persons in the United States and around the world.
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island