Ted Lieu (D-CA)
Reaffirming the importance of the United States promoting the safety, health, and well-being of refugees and displaced persons in the United States and around the world.
A Democratic resolution with 51 Democratic cosponsors · See all 51 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution reaffirms the importance of the United States promoting the safety, health, and well-being of refugees and displaced persons globally and within the country. It highlights the current global displacement crisis and the impact of recent executive actions that suspended refugee admissions. The document calls for the restoration of the United States Refugee Admissions Program. Additionally, it urges the President to lift the indefinite suspension of refugee admissions and resettlement. Finally, it directs various government officials to uphold international leadership in protecting vulnerable populations and addressing the root causes of migration.
Yes· 3 of 15
- Scored +8
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The bill seeks to restore refugee admissions and protect asylum seekers' rights.
- Scored +7
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
The bill emphasizes that due process should be afforded to all individuals under U.S. jurisdiction.
- Scored +6
Would women be better off under this?
The resolution specifically addresses the protection of women from violence and exploitation.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Restoration of Refugee Admissions: Lifting the indefinite suspension of the United States Refugee Admissions Program would allow those who are conditionally approved, ready for departure, or have flights booked to finally resettle in the United States. (Resolution Section 6)
-
Protection of Asylum Seekers: Rejecting bans and restrictions could ensure that refugees have access to due process and the protections enshrined in the Refugee Act of 1980. (Resolution Section 4)
-
Support for Vulnerable Populations: Continued leadership and partnership with the international community can help protect populations facing gender-based violence, torture, human trafficking, and persecution. (Resolution Section 7A)
-
Addressing Disability Needs: Implementing solutions to ensure accessible infrastructure and the availability of disability-related services can help those with disabilities. (Resolution Section 7H)
-
Economic and Community Contributions: The document notes that refugees often integrate into communities, join the workforce, and contribute to the economy through taxes and local commerce. (Whereas clauses)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Impact of the Refugee Admissions Ban: The indefinite suspension of the United States Refugee Admissions Program has put the lives and well-being of refugees, such as Afghans, Burmese Rohingya, and Sudanese, at risk. (Whereas clauses)
-
Consequences of the Travel Ban: The travel ban issued via Proclamation 10949 could deny refugees and asylum-seekers fleeing violence or persecution the chance to find safety in the United States. (Whereas clauses)
-
Risks of Deportation and Displacement: For many living in the United States, being subject to deportation due to widespread conflict or persecution in their countries of origin would cause significant harm. (Whereas clauses)
-
Impact of Foreign Assistance Cuts: Reductions in United States foreign assistance have led to cuts in food rations for refugees in camps, which threatens to destabilize fragile situations. (Whereas clauses)
-
Risks for Women and Girls: Women and girls face an increased risk of sexual violence, exploitation, and trafficking while traveling to seek safe living conditions. (Whereas clauses)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — The bill seeks to restore refugee admissions and protect asylum seekers' rights. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The bill promotes the protection and resettlement of LGBTQI+ refugees. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill calls for addressing barriers for refugees with disabilities through accessible services. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution specifically addresses the protection of women from violence and exploitation. Would children be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly highlights the education and protection of refugee children.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — The resolution advocates for restoring the Refugee Admissions Program and protecting asylum seekers. Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — The bill calls for addressing barriers faced by refugees with disabilities through accessible infrastructure. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The resolution emphasizes protecting women and girls from gender-based violence and exploitation. Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The resolution explicitly supports the protection and resettlement of LGBTQI+ refugees.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad? — The bill emphasizes international solidarity and addressing the root causes of migration. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The resolution calls for upholding international leadership and partnership with the global community. Does this send more money or help to other countries? — The bill advocates for humanitarian and development assistance to alleviate pressures on host countries.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The bill emphasizes that due process should be afforded to all individuals under U.S. jurisdiction.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — The text suggests that refugee integration contributes to economic strengths through taxes and local commerce. Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill notes that refugees help address labor demand in critical industries.
- 6/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 50 Cosponsors added.
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-HRES-1375: Reaffirming the importance of the United States promoting the safety, health, and well-being of refugees and displaced persons in the United States and around the world.
- 119-SRES-287: A resolution reaffirming the importance of the United States promoting the safety, health, and well-being of refugees and displaced persons in the United States and around the world.
- 119-SRES-775: A resolution reaffirming the importance of the United States promoting the safety, health, and well-being of refugees and displaced persons in the United States and around the world.
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Ami BeraDemocrat · California
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Diana DeGetteDemocrat · Colorado
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Teresa Leger FernandezDemocrat · New Mexico
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Robert MenendezDemocrat · New Jersey
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Nancy PelosiDemocrat · California
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey