Mark Warner (D-VA)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Marketplace Integrity and Affordability".
A Democratic resolution with 41 Democratic cosponsors · See all 43 cosponsors
Last activity — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 8.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
How Congress voted
- See who voted how →A vote on whether to start debating something · 01/13/2026
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule. The rule was submitted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It concerns the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Marketplace Integrity and Affordability." If passed, the resolution would ensure the rule has no force or effect.
Yes
- Scored +2
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
By using congressional disapproval to overturn a federal agency rule, the resolution asserts legislative authority over executive rulemaking.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -5
Does this strengthen the Affordable Care Act?
The resolution seeks to nullify a CMS rule specifically related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's marketplace integrity and affordability.
- Scored -3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Nullifying rules intended to improve marketplace affordability may negatively impact low-income households relying on ACA subsidies.
- Scored -2
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
The repeal of affordability-focused rules could lead to higher healthcare costs for middle-income families.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
- The Senate: a vote on whether to start debating something This decides only whether the chamber takes the measure up at all. Nothing about the measure itself has been decided when it passes. Blocked 47 yes · 52 no
01/13/2026 · Roll call 8 · recorded as “On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 84”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of the CMS Rule: By disapproving the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to ``Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Marketplace Integrity and Affordability'', this resolution ensures the rule shall have no force or effect.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No details provided: The provided text does not contain information regarding the specific contents of the rule being disapproved, and therefore cannot identify specific negative consequences or burdens.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Nullifying rules intended to improve marketplace affordability may negatively impact low-income households relying on ACA subsidies. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Changes to ACA marketplace rules can disproportionately affect demographic groups that rely heavily on marketplace coverage. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The repeal of affordability-focused rules could lead to higher healthcare costs for middle-income families.
- Healthcare
- Does this strengthen the Affordable Care Act? — The resolution seeks to nullify a CMS rule specifically related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's marketplace integrity and affordability.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — By using congressional disapproval to overturn a federal agency rule, the resolution asserts legislative authority over executive rulemaking.
- 1/13/2026
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (consideration: CR S147-157; text: CR S147)
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 8.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 293.
- 10/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
- 41 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Timothy KaineDemocrat · Virginia
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Jon OssoffDemocrat · Georgia
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Charles SchumerDemocrat · New York
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts