Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
A concurrent resolution expressing support for the recognition of March 10, 2026, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day".
A Democratic resolution with 12 Democratic cosponsors · See all 12 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S966)
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A concurrent resolution is how the Senate and the House settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.
What this bill would do
S. Con. Res. 28 is a concurrent resolution to recognize March 10, 2026, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day." The resolution celebrates the courage and care provided by abortion providers and their staff. It acknowledges the impact of the Dobbs decision and state-level abortion bans on patient access and provider safety. The resolution condemns efforts to limit or stigmatize abortion care. Finally, it expresses a commitment to a future where everyone has full access to abortion care without restrictions or fear.
Yes· 3 of 16
- Scored +7
Would women be better off under this?
Strongly advocates for the right to bodily autonomy and access to abortion care.
- Scored +5
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
Specifically highlights the impact of bans on Black women and the reproductive justice framework created by Black women.
- Scored +5
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
The resolution affirms the human right to bodily autonomy and the right to choose when and how to have children.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The resolution condemns state-level abortion bans.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Recognition of Essential Care: The resolution recognizes the high-quality and compassionate care that abortion providers and staff offer to patients and families across the U.S. (Resolved section 1).
-
Commitment to Safety and Access: It affirms the commitment of Congress to the safety of providers and the right of patients to access care regardless of where they live, without fear of stigma, criminalization, or violence (Resolved section 3).
-
Vision for Full Access: The resolution declares a goal for a future free from all abortion bans and restrictions so that everyone can access needed care without penalty (Resolved section 5).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not list specific provisions that would result in negative consequences or burdens for individuals.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would women be better off under this? — Strongly advocates for the right to bodily autonomy and access to abortion care. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Specifically highlights the impact of bans on Black women and the reproductive justice framework created by Black women. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Explicitly includes trans and nonbinary people in its call for abortion access. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Acknowledges that bans increase out-of-pocket costs and logistical burdens for patients. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Supports access to reproductive care which is critical for people of reproductive age. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Supports access to reproductive care which is critical for people of reproductive age. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Supports improved access to care for people of color who face heightened threats. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Supports improved access to care for people of color who face heightened threats. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Supports the general availability and safety of essential health services. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Supports improved access to care for people of color who face heightened threats. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Acknowledges the closures of clinics in underserved areas and maternal health deserts.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The resolution affirms the human right to bodily autonomy and the right to choose when and how to have children. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill acknowledges that restrictions on abortion disproportionately affect Black, indigenous, and people of color. Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — The resolution explicitly mentions the need for access for trans and nonbinary people.
- Healthcare
- Does this make abortion easier to get? — The resolution expresses a commitment to a future free from abortion bans and restrictions to ensure full access to care. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill advocates for the ability of providers to continue providing essential reproductive care to patients.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The resolution condemns state-level abortion bans.
- 3/10/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S966)
- 12 Cosponsors added.
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-HCONRES-18: Expressing support for the recognition of March 10, 2025, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day".
- 119-HCONRES-78: Expressing support for the recognition of March 10, 2026, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day".
- 119-SCONRES-9: A concurrent resolution expressing support for the recognition of March 10, 2025, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day".
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Elizabeth WarrenDemocrat · Massachusetts