Ayanna Pressley (D-MA)
Expressing support for the recognition of March 10, 2026, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day".
A Democratic resolution with 23 Democratic cosponsors · See all 23 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A concurrent resolution is how the House and the Senate settle something they do together, such as a budget plan or a joint session. It is adopted once both chambers agree to it, and that puts it into effect; it is not a law, so it does not go to the President.
What this bill would do
This concurrent resolution expresses support for recognizing March 10, 2026, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day." The resolution aims to celebrate the courage, compassion, and high-quality care provided by abortion providers and their staff. It highlights the challenges faced by these providers, including legal restrictions, clinic closures, and various forms of violence or harassment. Additionally, the text addresses the impact of the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision and state-level abortion bans. Finally, the resolution declares a vision for a future where abortion access is free from restrictions, bans, and stigma.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +5
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The resolution addresses the specific targeting and disproportionate impact of abortion restrictions on Black women.
- Scored +5
Would women be better off under this?
The resolution advocates for reproductive justice and the right for people to make decisions about their own bodies.
- Scored +5
Does this make abortion easier to get?
The resolution expresses a commitment to ensuring patients have access to abortion care regardless of location.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Recognition of Essential Care: The resolution recognizes March 10 as a day to show appreciation for the essential, high-quality care that abortion providers and staff provide to their communities and those traveling to them. (Whereas clause regarding March 10 establishment)
-
Support for Patient Rights and Access: The resolution affirms a commitment to ensuring the right of patients to access abortion care regardless of where they live, free from fear of violence, criminalization, or stigma. (Resolved section 3)
-
Focus on Provider Safety: The resolution affirms a commitment to ensuring the safety of abortion providers. (Resolved section 3)
-
Vision for Future Access: The resolution declares a vision for a future free from all abortion restrictions and bans, where everyone has full access to the care they need without fear of penalty or stigma. (Resolved section 5)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Increased Costs and Logistics for Patients: Restrictions and bans on abortion care create and increase out-of-pocket costs and logistical burdens, such as traveling out-of-state, finding childcare or lodging, and raising money for care. (Whereas clause regarding restrictions/banning and Whereas clause regarding clinic closures)
-
Health Risks for Patients: People denied abortion care are more likely to experience high blood pressure and other serious medical conditions during the end of pregnancy. (Whereas clause regarding restrictions on abortion care)
-
Impact of Clinic Closures: The closure of health care centers forces patients to have fewer options and face higher travel costs. (Whereas clause regarding 2025 Planned Parenthood closures)
-
Threats to Provider Safety: Abortion providers and staff are exposed to increased levels of harassment, violence, and politically motivated restrictions. (Whereas clause regarding restricting and banning access)
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The resolution addresses the specific targeting and disproportionate impact of abortion restrictions on Black women. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution advocates for reproductive justice and the right for people to make decisions about their own bodies. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The resolution aims to address the logistical and financial burdens that disproportionately affect low-income patients.
- Healthcare
- Does this make abortion easier to get? — The resolution expresses a commitment to ensuring patients have access to abortion care regardless of location. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The resolution affirms the essential role of abortion providers in ensuring patients receive necessary care.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution highlights how abortion restrictions disproportionately impact Black, indigenous, and people of color. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The resolution notes that being denied abortion care can lead to increased poverty for patients.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/12/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 22 Cosponsors added.
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-HCONRES-18: Expressing support for the recognition of March 10, 2025, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day".
- 119-SCONRES-9: A concurrent resolution expressing support for the recognition of March 10, 2025, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day".
- 119-SCONRES-28: A concurrent resolution expressing support for the recognition of March 10, 2026, as "Abortion Provider Appreciation Day".
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Diana DeGetteDemocrat · Colorado
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Joseph MorelleDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Eric SwalwellDemocrat · California
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey