John Barrasso (R-WY)

A bill to improve the point-in-time count conducted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and for other purposes.

S. 4903 · Senate bill Housing and Community Development

A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 3 cosponsors

Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S3206)

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill aims to improve the point-in-time count of homeless individuals conducted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. It requires recipients to participate in an annual count during the last 10 days of April each year. The bill mandates the use of standardized community-wide homeless management information systems for data collection. It also requires the maintenance of up-to-date data year-round and the collection of midpoint data to track trends. Additionally, the Secretary is tasked with providing technical assistance and training to rural or resource-limited recipients. Finally, the Comptroller General is directed to conduct a study on the count's methodology and provide recommendations for modernization.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Scored +3

    Does this make housing cost less?

    By improving the accuracy of homeless counts and tracking trends, the bill enables better planning for housing assistance programs.

  • Scored +3

    Is this likely to reduce homelessness?

    The bill aims to improve the accuracy and tracking of homeless populations to better inform and implement assistance programs.

  • Scored +3

    Would people in rural areas be better off under this?

    The bill specifically mandates technical assistance and training for rural and resource-limited recipients.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.