Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS)
Respect State Housing Laws Act
A Republican bill with 14 Republican cosponsors · See all 14 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Respect State Housing Laws Act. It was introduced in the Senate on February 6, 2025. The main purpose of the bill is to amend the CARES Act. Specifically, it removes the requirement that lessors must provide a notice to vacate. By doing this, it changes federal rules regarding rental properties.
Yes
- Scored +4
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill provides relief to landlords and property owners by removing federal notice obligations.
- Scored +3
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill reduces administrative burdens on lessors by removing the federal requirement to provide a notice to vacate.
The opposite· 3 of 6
- Scored -3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Removing notice requirements increases the risk of sudden displacement for vulnerable populations.
- Scored -2
Does this make housing cost less?
Removing notice to vacate requirements may reduce tenant security and stability in their housing.
- Scored -2
Is this likely to reduce homelessness?
The removal of notice to vacate requirements may lead to more rapid displacements, potentially increasing homelessness.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Removal of Federal Notice Mandate: The bill amends Section 4024 of the CARES Act by striking subsection (c). This removes the specific requirement for lessors to provide a notice to vacate, which could be seen as positive for landlords or property owners who want fewer federal restrictions on their properties.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Loss of Notice Requirement: Because Section 2 of the bill strikes subsection (c) of Section 4024 of the CARES Act, lessors are no longer required by that federal law to provide a notice to vacate. This could be considered a negative outcome for tenants who previously relied on that federal rule for receiving notice before having to leave a property.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — Removing notice to vacate requirements may reduce tenant security and stability in their housing. Is this likely to reduce homelessness? — The removal of notice to vacate requirements may lead to more rapid displacements, potentially increasing homelessness. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Reducing notice requirements can increase housing instability for low-income populations.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill provides relief to landlords and property owners by removing federal notice obligations. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Removing notice requirements increases the risk of sudden displacement for vulnerable populations. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill reduces housing stability protections for middle-income renters. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban residents who rely on rental housing may face increased housing insecurity due to the removal of notice requirements.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill reduces administrative burdens on lessors by removing the federal requirement to provide a notice to vacate.
- 9/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/6/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BoozmanRepublican · Arkansas
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Mike CrapoRepublican · Idaho
Tom CottonRepublican · Arkansas
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
John CurtisRepublican · Utah
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Eric SchmittRepublican · Missouri
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina